Literature DB >> 12238690

Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer.

Cláudia Regina Buainain de Freitas1, Maria Isabel Serra Miranda, Marcelo Ferrarezi de Andrade, Victor Humberto Orbegoso Flores, Luís Geraldo Vaz, Catanzaro Guimarães.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the resistance to fracture of intact and restored human maxillary premolars. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Thirty noncarious human maxillary premolars, divided into three groups of 10, were submitted to mechanical tests to evaluate their resistance to fracture. Group 1 consisted of intact teeth. Teeth in group 2 received mesio-occlusodistal cavity preparations and were restored with direct resin composite restorations. Teeth in group 3 received mesio-occlusodistal cavity preparations and were restored with ceromer inlays placed with the indirect technique. After restoration, teeth were stored at 37 degrees C for 24 hours and then thermocycled for 500 cycles at temperatures of 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C.
RESULTS: Statistical analysis revealed that group 3 (178.765 kgf) had a significantly greater maximum rupture load than did group 1 (120.040 kgf). There was no statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 or between groups 2 and 3.
CONCLUSION: Class II cavity preparations restored with indirect ceromer inlays offered greater resistance to fracture than did intact teeth. The fracture resistance of teeth restored with resin composite was not significantly different from that of either the ceromer or intact teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12238690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  11 in total

1.  Trend of posterior teeth restoration at ibadan, Nigeria.

Authors:  S O Gbadebo; O O Anifowose; T J Ogunrinde
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

2.  Class II composite resin restorations: faster, easier, predictable.

Authors:  R D Jackson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Prashant Monga; Vivek Sharma; Sukesh Kumar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2009-10

4.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with direct composite restorations.

Authors:  Maryam Moezizadeh; Nastaran Mokhtari
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-07

5.  Effect of fiber orientation and type of restorative material on fracture strength of the tooth.

Authors:  Maryam Moezizadeh; Mohadeseh Shokripour
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-10

6.  Fracture resistance of premolars restored by various types and placement techniques of resin composites.

Authors:  Horieh Moosavi; Mahsa Zeynali; Zahra Hosseini Pour
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-05-14

7.  In vitro evaluation of a passive radio frequency identification microchip implanted in human molars subjected to compression forces, for forensic purposes of human identification.

Authors:  Freddy Moreno; Diego Vallejo; Herney Garzón; Sandra Moreno
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2013-07

8.  Impact of Minimal Root Canal Taper on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Bicuspids.

Authors:  Carla Zogheib; Germain Sfeir; Gianluca Plotino; Gustavo De Deus; Maha Daou; Issam Khalil
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2018-04-24

9.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer.

Authors:  Fereshteh Shafiei; Maryam Sadat Tavangar; Yasamin Ghahramani; Zahra Fattah
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Fracture resistance of teeth restored with direct and indirect composite restorations.

Authors:  Hassan Torabzadeh; Amir Ghasemi; Atoosa Dabestani; Sara Razmavar
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.