Literature DB >> 26045008

A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the outcomes of circumferential subcuticular wound approximation (CSWA) with conventional wound closure after stoma reversal.

M P J Lopez1, M F A Melendres, S A C A Maglangit, M F T Roxas, H J Monroy, A C Crisostomo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The creation of a stoma is commonplace in colorectal surgery. Circumferential subcuticular wound approximation (CSWA) is a method of wound closure following stoma reversal that has been reported to result in decreased wound infection rates and more desirable aesthetic outcomes. The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of the CSWA method, in terms of wound infection and cosmesis by comparing the technique to the conventional method of wound closure.
METHODS: All adult patients who presented for stoma reversal at the outpatient clinic of the Division of Colorectal Surgery at the Philippine General Hospital were randomized into two groups, CSWA and conventional. Patients were followed up for up to 30 days postoperatively, photographic documentation of wound appearance was obtained, and wound infections and complications were documented. Patients were asked to complete a satisfaction survey at the end of the follow-up period.
RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included in the study. One (1.6%) patient in the CSWA group developed wound infection, while six (10%) patients in the conventional group had a wound infection (p = 0.061). The CSWA group had a higher total satisfaction score than the conventional group (25 and 24, respectively, p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: With regard to wound infection rates, the CSWA method was better than the conventional method, although this was found to be borderline significant. With regard to patient satisfaction, the CSWA method proved to be superior to the conventional method, and this was found to be statistically significant. In addition, the technique is applicable to all forms of stoma regardless of the bowel segment involved, trephine size, and indication for diversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26045008     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-015-1322-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  10 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds.

Authors:  K Reid; P Pockney; T Pollitt; B Draganic; S R Smith
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Primary closure of the skin after stoma closure. Management of wound infections is easy without (long-term) complications.

Authors:  N Vermulst; J Vermeulen; E J Hazebroek; P P L O Coene; E van der Harst
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 2.588

3.  Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients.

Authors:  Kutt-Sing Wong; Feza H Remzi; Emre Gorgun; Susana Arrigain; James M Church; Miriam Preen; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques.

Authors:  G Lahat; H Tulchinsky; G Goldman; J M Klauzner; M Rabau
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Pursestring skin closure after stoma reversal.

Authors:  A Banerjee
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Rates of morbidity and mortality after closure of loop and end colostomy.

Authors:  W J Mileski; R V Rege; R J Joehl; D L Nahrwold
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-07

7.  Subcutaneous gentamycin implant to reduce wound infections after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  O Haase; W Raue; B Böhm; H Neuss; M Scharfenberg; W Schwenk
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Complications of colostomy closure.

Authors:  D M Pittman; L E Smith
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Stoma closure and wound infection: an evaluation of risk factors.

Authors:  D J Hackam; O D Rotstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Wound infection after ileostomy closure can be eliminated by circumferential subcuticular wound approximation.

Authors:  Siamak Milanchi; Yosef Nasseri; Travis Kidner; Phillip Fleshner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.585

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  The effect of purse-string approximation versus linear approximation of ileostomy reversal wounds on morbidity rates and patient satisfaction: the 'STOMA' trial.

Authors:  D P O'Leary; M Carter; D Wijewardene; M Burton; D Waldron; E Condon; J C Coffey; C Peirce
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Considerations in Stoma Reversal.

Authors:  Karen L Sherman; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

3.  Purse-string approximation vs. primary closure with a drain for stoma reversal surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kunihiko Amano; Hideyuki Ishida; Kensuke Kumamoto; Norimichi Okada; Satoshi Hatano; Noriyasu Chika; Yusuke Tajima; Tomonori Ohsawa; Masaru Yokoyama; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Erito Mochiki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.549

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.