Iolanda Riba-Llena1,2, Marcel Koek3,4, Benjamin F J Verhaaren2,4, Henri A Vrooman3,4, Aad van der Lugt4, Albert Hofman2, M Arfan Ikram2,5, Meike W Vernooij2,4. 1. Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Vall Hebron's Research Institut, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Departments of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Departments of Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Departments of Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Departments of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cortical brain infarcts are defined as infarcts involving cortical gray matter, but may differ considerably in size. It is unknown whether small cortical infarcts have a similar clinical phenotype as larger counterparts. We investigated prevalence, determinants, and cognitive correlates of small cortical infarcts in the general population and compared these with large cortical infarcts and lacunar infarcts. METHODS: Four thousand nine hundred five nondemented individuals (age 63·95 ± 10·99) from a population-based study were included. Infarcts were rated on magnetic resonance imaging and participants were classified according to mean infarct diameter into small (≤15 mm in largest diameter) or large (>15 mm) cortical infarcts, lacunar infarcts, or a combination of subtypes. Spatial distribution maps were created for manually labeled small and large infarcts. Participants underwent cognitive testing. Analyses were performed using multinomial regression and analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-one (7·8%) persons had any infarct on magnetic resonance imaging, among whom 54 with small (1·1%) and 77 (1·6%) with large cortical infarcts. Small cortical infarcts were mainly localized in external watershed areas, whereas large cortical infarcts were localized primarily in large arterial territories. Age (odds ratio = 1·06; 95% confidence interval = 1·02, 1·09), male gender (1·98; 1·01, 3·92), and smoking (2·55; 1·06, 6·14) were determinants of small cortical infarcts. Participants with these infarcts had worse scores in delayed memory, processing speed, and attention tests than persons without infarcts, even after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In the elderly, small cortical infarcts appear as frequent as large infarcts but in different localization. Our results suggest that small cortical infarcts share cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive correlates with large cortical, but also with lacunar infarcts.
BACKGROUND:Cortical brain infarcts are defined as infarcts involving cortical gray matter, but may differ considerably in size. It is unknown whether small cortical infarcts have a similar clinical phenotype as larger counterparts. We investigated prevalence, determinants, and cognitive correlates of small cortical infarcts in the general population and compared these with large cortical infarcts and lacunar infarcts. METHODS: Four thousand nine hundred five nondemented individuals (age 63·95 ± 10·99) from a population-based study were included. Infarcts were rated on magnetic resonance imaging and participants were classified according to mean infarct diameter into small (≤15 mm in largest diameter) or large (>15 mm) cortical infarcts, lacunar infarcts, or a combination of subtypes. Spatial distribution maps were created for manually labeled small and large infarcts. Participants underwent cognitive testing. Analyses were performed using multinomial regression and analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-one (7·8%) persons had any infarct on magnetic resonance imaging, among whom 54 with small (1·1%) and 77 (1·6%) with large cortical infarcts. Small cortical infarcts were mainly localized in external watershed areas, whereas large cortical infarcts were localized primarily in large arterial territories. Age (odds ratio = 1·06; 95% confidence interval = 1·02, 1·09), male gender (1·98; 1·01, 3·92), and smoking (2·55; 1·06, 6·14) were determinants of small cortical infarcts. Participants with these infarcts had worse scores in delayed memory, processing speed, and attention tests than persons without infarcts, even after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In the elderly, small cortical infarcts appear as frequent as large infarcts but in different localization. Our results suggest that small cortical infarcts share cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive correlates with large cortical, but also with lacunar infarcts.
Authors: Laurens Jl De Cocker; Arjen Lindenholz; Jaco Jm Zwanenburg; Anja G van der Kolk; Maarten Zwartbol; Peter R Luijten; Jeroen Hendrikse Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Farzan Fatemi; Kejal Kantarci; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Gregory M Preboske; Stephen D Weigand; Scott A Przybelski; David S Knopman; Mary M Machulda; Rosebud O Roberts; Michelle M Mielke; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; Prashanthi Vemuri Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M Arfan Ikram; Aad van der Lugt; Wiro J Niessen; Peter J Koudstaal; Gabriel P Krestin; Albert Hofman; Daniel Bos; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Nolan S Hartkamp; J Hendrikse; Laurens J L De Cocker; Gert Jan de Borst; L Jaap Kappelle; Reinoud P H Bokkers Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 10.154