Monica S Barreto1, Jorge Faber2, Carlos J Vogel3, Telma M Araujo4. 1. a Resident in Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil. 2. b Adjunct Professor, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Department of Orthodontics, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil. 3. c Visiting Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil. 4. d Chair, Department of Orthodontics, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of digital orthodontic setup technology by comparing it with manual setups and models cast at the end of orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initial models, manual setups, and final models of 20 patients were used. The initial and final models, as well as the manual setups, were scanned using a 3Shape R-700 scanner, while the digital setups were fabricated based on the initial models using 3Shape OrthoAnalyzer software. Evaluation of the models based on the manual setup, digital setup, and final models of each patient was performed using the following linear measurements: intercanine widths, intermolar widths, and length of the upper and lower dental arches. RESULTS: The results disclosed that none of the measures assessed through the manual setup, digital setup, and final models showed statistically significant differences (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, it can be inferred that digital setups are as effective and accurate as manual setups and constitute a tool for diagnosing and treatment planning that can be reliably reproduced in orthodontic treatments.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of digital orthodontic setup technology by comparing it with manual setups and models cast at the end of orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initial models, manual setups, and final models of 20 patients were used. The initial and final models, as well as the manual setups, were scanned using a 3Shape R-700 scanner, while the digital setups were fabricated based on the initial models using 3Shape OrthoAnalyzer software. Evaluation of the models based on the manual setup, digital setup, and final models of each patient was performed using the following linear measurements: intercanine widths, intermolar widths, and length of the upper and lower dental arches. RESULTS: The results disclosed that none of the measures assessed through the manual setup, digital setup, and final models showed statistically significant differences (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, it can be inferred that digital setups are as effective and accurate as manual setups and constitute a tool for diagnosing and treatment planning that can be reliably reproduced in orthodontic treatments.
Authors: Olivier de Waard; Robin Bruggink; Frank Baan; Hendrikus A J Reukers; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Edwin M Ongkosuwito Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 4.241