Christina Ahlgren1,2, Anne Hammarström3,4, Susanne Sandberg4, Bernt Lindahl4, Tommy Olsson4, Christel Larsson5,6, Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund7,3. 1. Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, SE 901 87, Umeå, Sweden. christina.ahlgren@physiother.umu.se. 2. Umeå Centre for Gender Studies in Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. christina.ahlgren@physiother.umu.se. 3. Umeå Centre for Gender Studies in Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 4. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 5. Department of Food and Nutrition, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 6. Department of Food and Nutrition, and Sport Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 7. Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, SE 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Dietary weight loss interventions most often result in weight loss, but weight maintenance on a long-term basis is the main problem in obesity treatment. There is a need for an increased understanding of the behaviour patterns involved in adopting a new dietary behavior and to maintain the behaviour over time. PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to explore overweight and obese middle-aged women's experiences of the dietary change processes when participating in a 2-year-long diet intervention. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews with 12 overweight and obese women (54-71 years) were made after their participation in a diet intervention programme. The programme was designed as a RCT study comparing a diet according to the Nordic nutrition recommendations (NNR diet) and a Palaeolithic diet (PD). Interviews were analysed according to Grounded Theory principles. RESULTS: A core category "Engagement phases in the process of a diet intervention" concluded the analysis. Four categories included the informants' experiences during different stages of the process of dietary change: "Honeymoon phase", "Everyday life phase", "It's up to you phase" and "Crossroads phase". The early part of the intervention period was called "Honeymoon phase" and was characterised by positive experiences, including perceived weight loss and extensive support. The next phases, the "Everyday life phase" and "It's up to you phase", contained the largest obstacles to change. The home environment appeared as a crucial factor, which could be decisive for maintenance of the new dietary habits or relapse into old habits in the last phase called "Crossroads phase". CONCLUSION: We identified various phases of engagement in the process of a long-term dietary intervention among middle-aged women. A clear personal goal and support from family and friends seem to be of major importance for long-term maintenance of new dietary habits. Gender relations within the household must be considered as a possible obstacle for women engaging in diet intervention.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Dietary weight loss interventions most often result in weight loss, but weight maintenance on a long-term basis is the main problem in obesity treatment. There is a need for an increased understanding of the behaviour patterns involved in adopting a new dietary behavior and to maintain the behaviour over time. PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to explore overweight and obese middle-aged women's experiences of the dietary change processes when participating in a 2-year-long diet intervention. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews with 12 overweight and obesewomen (54-71 years) were made after their participation in a diet intervention programme. The programme was designed as a RCT study comparing a diet according to the Nordic nutrition recommendations (NNR diet) and a Palaeolithic diet (PD). Interviews were analysed according to Grounded Theory principles. RESULTS: A core category "Engagement phases in the process of a diet intervention" concluded the analysis. Four categories included the informants' experiences during different stages of the process of dietary change: "Honeymoon phase", "Everyday life phase", "It's up to you phase" and "Crossroads phase". The early part of the intervention period was called "Honeymoon phase" and was characterised by positive experiences, including perceived weight loss and extensive support. The next phases, the "Everyday life phase" and "It's up to you phase", contained the largest obstacles to change. The home environment appeared as a crucial factor, which could be decisive for maintenance of the new dietary habits or relapse into old habits in the last phase called "Crossroads phase". CONCLUSION: We identified various phases of engagement in the process of a long-term dietary intervention among middle-aged women. A clear personal goal and support from family and friends seem to be of major importance for long-term maintenance of new dietary habits. Gender relations within the household must be considered as a possible obstacle for women engaging in diet intervention.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dietary habits; Engagement; Experience; Intervention; Obese; Qualitative study
Authors: Christopher N Sciamanna; Michaela Kiernan; Barbara J Rolls; Jarol Boan; Heather Stuckey; Donna Kephart; Carla K Miller; Gordon Jensen; Terry J Hartmann; Eric Loken; Kevin O Hwang; Ronald J Williams; Melissa A Clark; Jane R Schubart; Arthur M Nezu; Erik Lehman; Cheryl Dellasega Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Naomi R Reyes; Tracy L Oliver; Alicia A Klotz; Caitlin A Lagrotte; Stephanie S Vander Veur; Amy Virus; Brooke A Bailer; Gary D Foster Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Marion J Franz; Jeffrey J VanWormer; A Lauren Crain; Jackie L Boucher; Trina Histon; William Caplan; Jill D Bowman; Nicolas P Pronk Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2007-10
Authors: Courtney D Perry; Dennis Degeneffe; Cynthia Davey; Grace Kollannoor-Samuel; Marla Reicks Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Laura A Graham; Emily B Malone; Joshua S Richman; April P Carson; Olivia Affuso; Sara J Knight; Emily B Levitan Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Heather Behr; Annabell Suh Ho; Ellen Siobhan Mitchell; Qiuchen Yang; Laura DeLuca; Andreas Michealides Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-19 Impact factor: 3.390