BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the weight-control practices that promote weight loss and weight-loss maintenance in the same sample. PURPOSE: To examine whether the weight control practices associated with weight loss differ from those associated with weight-loss maintenance. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of a random sample of 1165 U.S. adults. The adjusted associations of the use of 36 weight-control practices in the past week with success in weight loss (≥10% lost in the past year) and success in weight-loss maintenance (≥10% lost and maintained for ≥1 year) were examined. RESULTS: Of the 36 practices, only 8 (22%) were associated with both weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Overall, there was poor agreement (kappa=0.22) between the practices associated with weight loss and/or weight-loss maintenance. For example, those who reported more often following a consistent exercise routine or eating plenty of low-fat sources of protein were 1.97 (95% CI=1.33, 2.94) and 1.76 (95% CI=1.25, 2.50) times more likely, respectively, to report weight-loss maintenance but not weight loss. Alternatively, those who reported more often doing different kinds of exercises or planning meals ahead of time were 2.56 (95% CI=1.44, 4.55) and 1.68 (95% CI=1.03, 2.74) times more likely, respectively, to report weight loss but not weight-loss maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: Successful weight loss and weight-loss maintenance may require two different sets of practices. Designing interventions with this premise may inform the design of more effective weight-loss maintenance interventions.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the weight-control practices that promote weight loss and weight-loss maintenance in the same sample. PURPOSE: To examine whether the weight control practices associated with weight loss differ from those associated with weight-loss maintenance. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of a random sample of 1165 U.S. adults. The adjusted associations of the use of 36 weight-control practices in the past week with success in weight loss (≥10% lost in the past year) and success in weight-loss maintenance (≥10% lost and maintained for ≥1 year) were examined. RESULTS: Of the 36 practices, only 8 (22%) were associated with both weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Overall, there was poor agreement (kappa=0.22) between the practices associated with weight loss and/or weight-loss maintenance. For example, those who reported more often following a consistent exercise routine or eating plenty of low-fat sources of protein were 1.97 (95% CI=1.33, 2.94) and 1.76 (95% CI=1.25, 2.50) times more likely, respectively, to report weight-loss maintenance but not weight loss. Alternatively, those who reported more often doing different kinds of exercises or planning meals ahead of time were 2.56 (95% CI=1.44, 4.55) and 1.68 (95% CI=1.03, 2.74) times more likely, respectively, to report weight loss but not weight-loss maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: Successful weight loss and weight-loss maintenance may require two different sets of practices. Designing interventions with this premise may inform the design of more effective weight-loss maintenance interventions.
Authors: Christina Ahlgren; Anne Hammarström; Susanne Sandberg; Bernt Lindahl; Tommy Olsson; Christel Larsson; Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2016-02
Authors: Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Kevin O Hwang; Daniel R George; Erik B Lehman; Christopher N Sciamanna Journal: Obes Res Clin Pract Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 2.288
Authors: Krista Casazza; Andrew Brown; Arne Astrup; Fredrik Bertz; Charles Baum; Michelle Bohan Brown; John Dawson; Nefertiti Durant; Gareth Dutton; David A Fields; Kevin R Fontaine; Steven Heymsfield; David Levitsky; Tapan Mehta; Nir Menachemi; P K Newby; Russell Pate; Hollie Raynor; Barbara J Rolls; Bisakha Sen; Daniel L Smith; Diana Thomas; Brian Wansink; David B Allison Journal: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Date: 2015 Impact factor: 11.176
Authors: Lisa J Germeroth; Maria T Benno; Rachel P Kolko Conlon; Rebecca L Emery; Yu Cheng; Jennifer Grace; Rachel H Salk; Michele D Levine Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Robert A Carels; Jacob M Burmeister; Afton M Koball; Marissa W Oehlhof; Nova Hinman; Michelle LeRoy; Erin Bannon; Lee Ashrafioun; Amy Storfer-Isser; Lynn A Darby; Amanda Gumble Journal: J Health Psychol Date: 2013-01-24
Authors: Emma R Lawlor; Carly A Hughes; Robbie Duschinsky; Gillian D Pountain; Andrew J Hill; Simon J Griffin; Amy L Ahern Journal: Clin Obes Date: 2020-08-07