Literature DB >> 21767723

Practices associated with weight loss versus weight-loss maintenance results of a national survey.

Christopher N Sciamanna1, Michaela Kiernan, Barbara J Rolls, Jarol Boan, Heather Stuckey, Donna Kephart, Carla K Miller, Gordon Jensen, Terry J Hartmann, Eric Loken, Kevin O Hwang, Ronald J Williams, Melissa A Clark, Jane R Schubart, Arthur M Nezu, Erik Lehman, Cheryl Dellasega.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the weight-control practices that promote weight loss and weight-loss maintenance in the same sample.
PURPOSE: To examine whether the weight control practices associated with weight loss differ from those associated with weight-loss maintenance.
METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of a random sample of 1165 U.S. adults. The adjusted associations of the use of 36 weight-control practices in the past week with success in weight loss (≥10% lost in the past year) and success in weight-loss maintenance (≥10% lost and maintained for ≥1 year) were examined.
RESULTS: Of the 36 practices, only 8 (22%) were associated with both weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Overall, there was poor agreement (kappa=0.22) between the practices associated with weight loss and/or weight-loss maintenance. For example, those who reported more often following a consistent exercise routine or eating plenty of low-fat sources of protein were 1.97 (95% CI=1.33, 2.94) and 1.76 (95% CI=1.25, 2.50) times more likely, respectively, to report weight-loss maintenance but not weight loss. Alternatively, those who reported more often doing different kinds of exercises or planning meals ahead of time were 2.56 (95% CI=1.44, 4.55) and 1.68 (95% CI=1.03, 2.74) times more likely, respectively, to report weight loss but not weight-loss maintenance.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful weight loss and weight-loss maintenance may require two different sets of practices. Designing interventions with this premise may inform the design of more effective weight-loss maintenance interventions.
Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21767723     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  40 in total

1.  Engagement in New Dietary Habits-Obese Women's Experiences from Participating in a 2-Year Diet Intervention.

Authors:  Christina Ahlgren; Anne Hammarström; Susanne Sandberg; Bernt Lindahl; Tommy Olsson; Christel Larsson; Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2016-02

2.  Feasibility of utilising an all-volunteer workforce as a disruptive innovation for the US obesity epidemic.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Kevin O Hwang; Daniel R George; Erik B Lehman; Christopher N Sciamanna
Journal:  Obes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  The H2020 "NoHoW Project": A Position Statement on Behavioural Approaches to Longer-Term Weight Management.

Authors:  R James Stubbs; Cristiana Duarte; Ruairi O'Driscoll; Jake Turicchi; Dominika Kwasnicka; Falko F Sniehotta; Marta M Marques; Graham Horgan; Sofus Larsen; António Palmeira; Inês Santos; Pedro J Teixeira; Jason Halford; Berit Lilienthal Heitmann
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 4.  Weighing the Evidence of Common Beliefs in Obesity Research.

Authors:  Krista Casazza; Andrew Brown; Arne Astrup; Fredrik Bertz; Charles Baum; Michelle Bohan Brown; John Dawson; Nefertiti Durant; Gareth Dutton; David A Fields; Kevin R Fontaine; Steven Heymsfield; David Levitsky; Tapan Mehta; Nir Menachemi; P K Newby; Russell Pate; Hollie Raynor; Barbara J Rolls; Bisakha Sen; Daniel L Smith; Diana Thomas; Brian Wansink; David B Allison
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.176

5.  Trial design and methodology for a non-restricted sequential multiple assignment randomized trial to evaluate combinations of perinatal interventions to optimize women's health.

Authors:  Lisa J Germeroth; Maria T Benno; Rachel P Kolko Conlon; Rebecca L Emery; Yu Cheng; Jennifer Grace; Rachel H Salk; Michele D Levine
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Daily self-monitoring of body weight, step count, fruit/vegetable intake, and water consumption: a feasible and effective long-term weight loss maintenance approach.

Authors:  Jeremy D Akers; Rachel A Cornett; Jyoti S Savla; Kevin P Davy; Brenda M Davy
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  Physical Activity and Dietary Determinants of Weight Loss Success in the US General Population.

Authors:  Patrick Wilson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Short- and long-term eating habit modification predicts weight change in overweight, postmenopausal women: results from the WOMAN study.

Authors:  Bethany Barone Gibbs; Laura S Kinzel; Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Yue-Fang Chang; Lewis H Kuller
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.910

9.  A randomized trial comparing two approaches to weight loss: differences in weight loss maintenance.

Authors:  Robert A Carels; Jacob M Burmeister; Afton M Koball; Marissa W Oehlhof; Nova Hinman; Michelle LeRoy; Erin Bannon; Lee Ashrafioun; Amy Storfer-Isser; Lynn A Darby; Amanda Gumble
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-01-24

10.  Cognitive and behavioural strategies employed to overcome "lapses" and prevent "relapse" among weight-loss maintainers and regainers: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Emma R Lawlor; Carly A Hughes; Robbie Duschinsky; Gillian D Pountain; Andrew J Hill; Simon J Griffin; Amy L Ahern
Journal:  Clin Obes       Date:  2020-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.