C Hällsjö Sander1,2, M Hallbäck3, F Suarez Sipmann4,5, M Wallin2,3, A Oldner1,2, H Björne1,2. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Services and Intensive Care Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden. 2. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Maquet Critical Care AB, Solna, Sweden. 4. Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Hedenstierna's Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 5. CIBERES, CIBER de enfermedades respiratorias, Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We have evaluated a new method for continuous monitoring of effective pulmonary blood flow (COEPBF ), i.e. cardiac output (CO) minus intra-pulmonary shunt, during mechanical ventilation. The method has shown good trending ability during severe hemodynamic challenges in a porcine model with intact lungs. In this study, we further evaluate the COEPBF method in a model of lung lavage. METHODS: COEPBF was compared to a reference method for CO during hemodynamic and PEEP alterations, 5 and 12 cmH2 O, before and after repeated lung lavages in 10 anaesthetised pigs. Bland-Altman, four-quadrant and polar plot methodologies were used to determine agreement and trending ability. RESULTS: After lung lavage at PEEP 5 cmH2 O, the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure related to inspired fraction of oxygen significantly decreased. The mean difference (limits of agreement) between methods changed from 0.2 (-1.1 to 1.5) to -0.9 (-3.6 to 1.9) l/min and percentage error increased from 34% to 70%. Trending ability remained good according to the four-quadrant plot (concordance rate 94%), whereas mean angular bias increased from 4° to -16° when using the polar plot methodology. CONCLUSION: Both agreement and precision of COEPBF were impaired in relation to CO when the shunt fraction was increased after lavage at PEEP 5 cmH2 O. However, trending ability remained good as assessed by the four-quadrant plot, whereas the mean polar angle, calculated by the polar plot, was wide.
BACKGROUND: We have evaluated a new method for continuous monitoring of effective pulmonary blood flow (COEPBF ), i.e. cardiac output (CO) minus intra-pulmonary shunt, during mechanical ventilation. The method has shown good trending ability during severe hemodynamic challenges in a porcine model with intact lungs. In this study, we further evaluate the COEPBF method in a model of lung lavage. METHODS: COEPBF was compared to a reference method for CO during hemodynamic and PEEP alterations, 5 and 12 cmH2 O, before and after repeated lung lavages in 10 anaesthetised pigs. Bland-Altman, four-quadrant and polar plot methodologies were used to determine agreement and trending ability. RESULTS: After lung lavage at PEEP 5 cmH2 O, the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure related to inspired fraction of oxygen significantly decreased. The mean difference (limits of agreement) between methods changed from 0.2 (-1.1 to 1.5) to -0.9 (-3.6 to 1.9) l/min and percentage error increased from 34% to 70%. Trending ability remained good according to the four-quadrant plot (concordance rate 94%), whereas mean angular bias increased from 4° to -16° when using the polar plot methodology. CONCLUSION: Both agreement and precision of COEPBF were impaired in relation to CO when the shunt fraction was increased after lavage at PEEP 5 cmH2 O. However, trending ability remained good as assessed by the four-quadrant plot, whereas the mean polar angle, calculated by the polar plot, was wide.