Literature DB >> 26040600

Quantification of the passive and active biaxial mechanical behaviour and microstructural organization of rat thoracic ducts.

Alexander W Caulk1, Zhanna V Nepiyushchikh1, Ryan Shaw1, J Brandon Dixon2, Rudolph L Gleason3.   

Abstract

Mechanical loading conditions are likely to play a key role in passive and active (contractile) behaviour of lymphatic vessels. The development of a microstructurally motivated model of lymphatic tissue is necessary for quantification of mechanically mediated maladaptive remodelling in the lymphatic vasculature. Towards this end, we performed cylindrical biaxial testing of Sprague-Dawley rat thoracic ducts (n = 6) and constitutive modelling to characterize their mechanical behaviour. Spontaneous contraction was quantified at transmural pressures of 3, 6 and 9 cmH2O. Cyclic inflation in calcium-free saline was performed at fixed axial stretches between 1.30 and 1.60, while recording pressure, outer diameter and axial force. A microstructurally motivated four-fibre family constitutive model originally proposed by Holzapfel et al. (Holzapfel et al. 2000 J. Elast. 61, 1-48. (doi:10.1023/A:1010835316564)) was used to quantify the passive mechanical response, and the model of Rachev and Hayashi was used to quantify the active (contractile) mechanical response. The average error between data and theory was 8.9 ± 0.8% for passive data and 6.6 ± 2.6% and 6.8 ± 3.4% for the systolic and basal conditions, respectively, for active data. Multi-photon microscopy was performed to quantify vessel wall thickness (32.2 ± 1.60 µm) and elastin and collagen organization for three loading conditions. Elastin exhibited structural 'fibre families' oriented nearly circumferentially and axially. Sample-to-sample variation was observed in collagen fibre distributions, which were often non-axisymmetric, suggesting material asymmetry. In closure, this paper presents a microstructurally motivated model that accurately captures the biaxial active and passive mechanical behaviour in lymphatics and offers potential for future research to identify parameters contributing to mechanically mediated disease development.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; lumped parameter; lymph transport; lymphoedema

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26040600      PMCID: PMC4528593          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  45 in total

1.  Theoretical study of the effects of vascular smooth muscle contraction on strain and stress distributions in arteries.

Authors:  A Rachev; K Hayashi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Lymphatic muscle: a review of contractile function.

Authors:  Eric A Bridenbaugh; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.589

3.  A 2D constrained mixture model for arterial adaptations to large changes in flow, pressure and axial stretch.

Authors:  Rudolph L Gleason; Jay D Humphrey
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Contraction-initiated NO-dependent lymphatic relaxation: a self-regulatory mechanism in rat thoracic duct.

Authors:  Olga Yu Gasheva; David C Zawieja; Anatoliy A Gashev
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Intrinsic pump-conduit behavior of lymphangions.

Authors:  Christopher M Quick; Arun M Venugopal; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja; Randolph H Stewart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  A multiaxial computer-controlled organ culture and biomechanical device for mouse carotid arteries.

Authors:  R L Gleason; S P Gray; E Wilson; J D Humphrey
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Thoracic duct variations may complicate the anterior spine procedures.

Authors:  Omer Akcali; Amac Kiray; Ipek Ergur; Suleyman Tetik; Emin Alici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Modeling flow in collecting lymphatic vessels: one-dimensional flow through a series of contractile elements.

Authors:  A J Macdonald; K P Arkill; G R Tabor; N G McHale; C P Winlove
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  A computer model of the lymphatic system.

Authors:  N P Reddy; T A Krouskop; P H Newell
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.589

10.  Computer-aided vascular experimentation: a new electromechanical test system.

Authors:  J D Humphrey; T Kang; P Sakarda; M Anjanappa
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  15 in total

1.  Biomechanical Comparison of Glutaraldehyde-Crosslinked Gelatin Fibrinogen Electrospun Scaffolds to Porcine Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  E Tamimi; D C Ardila; D G Haskett; T Doetschman; M J Slepian; R S Kellar; J P Vande Geest
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Effects of dynamic shear and transmural pressure on wall shear stress sensitivity in collecting lymphatic vessels.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kornuta; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Olga Y Gasheva; Anish Mukherjee; David C Zawieja; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Inhibition of contraction strength and frequency by wall shear stress in a single-lymphangion model.

Authors:  C D Bertram; Charles Macaskill; James E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  The relationship between lymphangion chain length and maximum pressure generation established through in vivo imaging and computational modeling.

Authors:  Mohammad S Razavi; Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Rudolph L Gleason; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Biaxial Mechanical Assessment of the Murine Vaginal Wall Using Extension-Inflation Testing.

Authors:  Kathryn M Robison; Cassandra K Conway; Laurephile Desrosiers; Leise R Knoepp; Kristin S Miller
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Lymphatic remodelling in response to lymphatic injury in the hind limbs of sheep.

Authors:  Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Joshua S T Hooks; Mohammad S Razavi; Tristan Lewis; Cristina C Clement; Merrilee Thoresen; Matthew T Cribb; Mindy K Ross; Rudolph L Gleason; Laura Santambrogio; John F Peroni; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 7.  Lymphatic Vessel Network Structure and Physiology.

Authors:  Jerome W Breslin; Ying Yang; Joshua P Scallan; Richard S Sweat; Shaquria P Adderley; Walter L Murfee
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 9.090

8.  Pump function curve shape for a model lymphatic vessel.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; J E Moore
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.242

9.  A lumped parameter model of mechanically mediated acute and long-term adaptations of contractility and geometry in lymphatics for characterization of lymphedema.

Authors:  Alexander W Caulk; J Brandon Dixon; Rudolph L Gleason
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-04-04

10.  Lymphatic System Flows.

Authors:  James E Moore; Christopher D Bertram
Journal:  Annu Rev Fluid Mech       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 18.511

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.