| Literature DB >> 26040574 |
Tsai-Chung Li1, Chia-Ing Li, Li-Na Liao, Chiu-Shong Liu, Chuan-Wei Yang, Chih-Hsueh Lin, Jen-Hao Hsiao, Chih-Yi Hsiao, Wen-Yuan Lin, Fang-Yang Wu, Cheng-Chieh Lin.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the interacted association between EDNRA and EDN1 polymorphisms and gender, regular exercise, and obesity status on carotid intima media thickness (IMT) in community- dwelling subjects of the Taichung Community Health Study. Five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs rs1395821, rs1878406, rs5333, rs1800541, and rs5370) of the EDNRA and EDN1 gene were examined in 480 participants from 160 families. The IMT protocol involves scanning the common carotid arteries (CCAs), the carotid bifurcations (bulb), and the origins (first 1 cm) of the internal carotid arteries (ICAs). Generalized linear models with a generalized estimating equation were employed to consider the dependence among family members. After multivariate adjustment, the effects of interactions between EDNRA and EDN1 gene with gender, obesity, and exercise were observed. For gene-gender interaction on CCA IMT, the adjusted mean for men carrying the GA/GG genotype of EDNRASNP rs1878406 was 1.18 times higher than that for men carrying the AA genotype (95% CI: 1.01, 1.37). As for bulb and ICA IMT, the adjusted mean values for women carrying the AC/AA genotype of EDN1 rs5370 was lower than those carrying the CC genotype: 0.89, [0.82, 0.98]; and 0.90 [0.83, 0.99], respectively. We did observe significant effects of EDNRA SNPs rs1395821 and rs5333 in individuals who regularly exercised. A significantly lower adjusted mean in CCA IMT for non-obese individuals carrying EDNRA SNP rs5333 was observed (0.92 [0.86, 0.99]) compared with non-obese individuals carrying the AA genotype. This study first reported significant interactions of EDNRA and EDN1 polymorphisms with gender, regular exercise, and obesity on carotid IMT in Han Chinese participants.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26040574 PMCID: PMC4502041 DOI: 10.7603/s40681-015-0008-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicine (Taipei) ISSN: 2211-8020
Characteristics of study subjects.
| Total (n = 480) | Men (n = 251, 52.3%) | Women (n = 229, 47.7%) | ||||
| Age (years) | 51.39 ± 15.08 | 51.49 ± 16.28 | 51.28 ± 13.67 | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.93 ± 3.38 | 24.73 ± 3.41 | 23.05 ± 3.14 | |||
| Obesity | 77 (16.4) | 53 (21.12) | 24 (10.48) | |||
|
| ||||||
| Regular exercise | 306 (63.75) | 165 (65.74) | 141 (61.57) | |||
| Smoking | 84 (17.5) | 79(31.47) | 5(2.18) | |||
| Drinking | 93 (19.38) | 76 (30.28) | 17 (7.42) | |||
| Betel nut chewing | 13 (2.71) | 13 (5.18) | 0 (0) | |||
|
| ||||||
| Hypertension | 121 (25.21) | 77 (30.68) | 44 (19.21) | |||
| Hyperglycemia | 50 (10.44) | 33 (13.15) | 17 (7.46) | |||
| Hyperlipidemia | 162 (33.89) | 87 (34.8) | 75 (32.89) | |||
| CVA | 6 (1.25) | 4 (1.59) | 2(0.87) | |||
| Cancer | 18 (3.76) | 6 (2.39) | 12 (5.26) | |||
| IMT measurements | ||||||
| IMT-CCA- distance (mm) | 0.86 ± 0.29 | 0.91 ± 0.34 | 0.8 ± 0.22 | |||
| IMT-Bulb- proximal (mm) | 1.25 ± 0.70 | 1.31 ± 0.73 | 1.18 ± 0.66 | |||
| IMT-ICA- proximal (mm) | 0.86 ± 0.46 | 0.93 ± 0.51 | 0.79 ± 0.37 |
Data were presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables or n (%) for categorical variables. BMI: body mass index; CVA: cerebral vascular accident.
Genotype distributions of study subjects and IMT distributions according to genotype status.
| Gene | SNP | Genotype or allele | n (%) | CCA IMT # | BULB IMT # | ICA IMT # | ||||||
| EDNRA | rs1395821 | A A | 184 (38.33) | 0.84 ± 1.35 | 1.13 ± 1.63 | 0.82 ± 1.52 | ||||||
| A G | 229 (47.71) | 0.82 ± 1.33 | 1.11 ± 1.62 | 0.78 ± 1.45 | ||||||||
| G G | 64 (13.33) | 0.78 ± 1.29 | 1.02 ± 1.57 | 0.74 ± 1.41 | ||||||||
| G* | 357 (0.37) | |||||||||||
| EDNRA | rs1878406 | A A | 22 (4.58) | 0.84 ± 1.37 | 1.2 ± 1.7 | 0.89 ± 1.52 | ||||||
| A G | 158 (32.92) | 0.83 ± 1.33 | 1.15 ± 1.63 | 0.8 ± 1.48 | ||||||||
| G G | 298 (62.08) | 0.81 ± 1.33 | 1.08 ± 1.61 | 0.78 ± 1.47 | ||||||||
| A* | 202 (0.27) | |||||||||||
| EDNRA | rs5333 | A A | 300 (62.5) | 0.82 ± 1.34 | 1.09 ± 1.62 | 0.78 ± 1.47 | ||||||
| A G | 161 (33.54) | 0.83 ± 1.32 | 1.14 ± 1.63 | 0.79 ± 1.48 | ||||||||
| G G | 18 (3.75) | 0.8 ± 1.27 | 1 ± 1.47 | 0.85 ± 1.5 | ||||||||
| G* | 197 (0.21) | |||||||||||
| EDN1 | rs1800541 | A A | 313 (65.21) | 0.81 ± 1.31 | 1.09 ± 1.61 | 0.78 ± 1.48 | ||||||
| A C | 148 (30.83) | 0.84 ± 1.36 | 1.14 ± 1.65 | 0.81 ± 1.46 | ||||||||
| C C | 18 (3.75) | 0.8 ± 1.36 | 1.06 ± 1.42 | 0.73 ± 1.43 | ||||||||
| C* | 184 (0.19) | |||||||||||
| EDN1 | rs5370 | A A | 34 (7.08) | 0.82 ± 1.32 | 1.11 ± 1.62 | 0.78 ± 1.47 | ||||||
| A C | 191 (39.79) | 0.83 ± 1.34 | 1.11 ± 1.63 | 0.8 ± 1.47 | ||||||||
| C C | 250 (52.08) | 0.8 ± 1.37 | 1.04 ± 1.56 | 0.81 ± 1.5 | ||||||||
| A* | 259 (0.37) |
Data were presented as n (%) for genotypes and alleles or mean ± SD for IMT.
#: Geometric mean was presented.
*: Minor allele.
Significant gene-environment interactions on CCA-distance, BULB-proximal, and ICAproximal.
| Environment | Gene | SNP | P for interaction | |||||||
| CCA IMT | BULB IMT | ICA IMT | ||||||||
| Gender | ||||||||||
| EDNRA | rs1395821 | 0.03d | 0.026d | |||||||
| EDNRA | rs1878406 | 0.017r | ||||||||
| EDNRA | rs5333 | 0.036 r | ||||||||
| EDN1 | rs1800541 | 0.024 d | ||||||||
| EDN1 | rs5370 | 0.019 d | 0.033r | |||||||
| Regular exercise | ||||||||||
| EDNRA | rs1395821 | 0.02 r | 0.031r | |||||||
| EDNRA | rs5333 | 0.002 r | ||||||||
| Obesity | ||||||||||
| EDNRA | rs5333 | 0.027 r |
d: interaction term was assessed by a dominant model; r: interaction term was assessed by a recessive model.
Fig. 1 –Stratified analysis by gender (A), exercise (B), and obesity (C) for significant interaction of EDNRA rs1395821, rs1878406, and rs5333, as well as EDN1 rs1800541, and rs5370 with gender, exercise, and obesity on CCA, bulb, and ICA IMTs are shown. The adjusted mean ratios were obtained from the models with consideration of SNP, age, gender, obesity, smoking, alcohol drinking, and betel nut chewing. *P 003C; 0.05. r: recessive model; d: dominant model.