Literature DB >> 2603978

Contractility is the main determinant of coronary systolic flow impediment.

R Krams1, P Sipkema, J Zegers, N Westerhof.   

Abstract

We measured the relation between coronary flow amplitude (delta F = Fd-Fs; where d is diastolic and s is systolic) and developed left ventricular pressure (delta PLV = Ps-Pd) at a constant perfusion pressure of 75 mmHg (10 kPa) in the maximally vasodilated blood-perfused isolated cat heart for different steady-state levels of contractility (protocol A) and during transients in contractility (protocol B). Contractility was defined as the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relation (Emax). From protocol A it appeared that the coronary flow amplitude was only weakly related to left ventricular pressure at each steady-state level of contractility studied. However, the coronary flow amplitude was strongly related to the different levels of contractility. In protocol B, contractility was changed over a wide range of values (0-100%) but developed pressure and contractility changed simultaneously. Using multiple linear regression analysis, we found that contractility has approximately 10 times (range: 2.8-57.3) stronger effect than left ventricular pressure on coronary flow amplitude (n = 10 experiments). These data and our earlier observations suggest that it is the difference in stiffness of cardiac muscle between systole and diastole that determines coronary flow amplitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2603978     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1989.257.6.H1936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  26 in total

1.  Wall thickness of coronary vessels varies transmurally in the LV but not the RV: implications for local stress distribution.

Authors:  Jenny Susana Choy; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Quantitative analysis of exercise-induced enhancement of early- and late-systolic retrograde coronary blood flow.

Authors:  Shawn B Bender; Marc J van Houwelingen; Daphne Merkus; Dirk J Duncker; M Harold Laughlin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-12-10

3.  Mechanisms of myocardium-coronary vessel interaction.

Authors:  Dotan Algranati; Ghassan S Kassab; Yoram Lanir
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 4.  Mechanical determinants of myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  J A Spaan
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 17.165

Review 5.  Physiological hypotheses--intramyocardial pressure. A new concept, suggestions for measurement.

Authors:  N Westerhof
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 17.165

6.  Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation of coronary resistance vessels in severely stunned porcine myocardium.

Authors:  E O McFalls; D J Duncker; H Ward; P Fashingbauer
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 17.165

7.  Heart rate affects the dependency of myocardial oxygen consumption on flow in goats.

Authors:  C P Van der Ploeg; J Dankelman; J A Spaan
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow.

Authors:  Adam G Goodwill; Gregory M Dick; Alexander M Kiel; Johnathan D Tune
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 9.090

Review 9.  Myocardial-vessel interaction: role of LV pressure and myocardial contractility.

Authors:  Ghassan S Kassab; Dotan Algranati; Yoram Lanir
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Coronary flow patterns in normal and ischemic hearts: transmyocardial and artery to vein distribution.

Authors:  R Beyar; R Caminker; D Manor; S Sideman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.