| Literature DB >> 26039494 |
Valeria Calcaterra1, Pierangelo Veggiotti2, Clara Palestrini3, Valentina De Giorgis4, Roberto Raschetti5, Massimiliano Tumminelli6, Simonetta Mencherini7, Francesca Papotti3, Catherine Klersy8, Riccardo Albertini9, Selene Ostuni10, Gloria Pelizzo11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Interest in animal-assisted therapy has been fuelled by studies supporting the many health benefits. The purpose of this study was to better understand the impact of an animal-assisted therapy program on children response to stress and pain in the immediate post-surgical period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty children (3-17 years) were enrolled in the randomised open-label, controlled, pilot study. Patients were randomly assigned to the animal-assisted therapy-group (n = 20, who underwent a 20 min session with an animal-assisted therapy dog, after surgery) or the standard-group (n = 20, standard postoperative care). The study variables were determined in each patient, independently of the assigned group, by a researcher unblinded to the patient's group. The outcomes of the study were to define the neurological, cardiovascular and endocrinological impact of animal-assisted therapy in response to stress and pain. Electroencephalogram activity, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, cerebral prefrontal oxygenation, salivary cortisol levels and the faces pain scale were considered as outcome measures.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26039494 PMCID: PMC4454536 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125813
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow diagram of the progress through the phases of the randomised trial of two groups (animal-assisted therapy and standard care after surgery).
Demographic and auxological features of the children at admission and vital signs pre intervention.
| Animal-assisted therapy group (n = 20) | Standard group (n = 20) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 8.59±3.70 | 7.36±2.48 |
| Gender (M/F) | 15/5 | 17/3 |
| Height (cm) | 131.00±23.59 | 120.70±17.83 |
| Weight (kg) | 31.50±17.18 | 25.35±10.38 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 18.4±2.4 | 17.6±3.2 |
| Anesthesia time (min) | 45.0 (45.0–55.0) | 62.5 (50.0–70.0) |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 96.83±20.06 | 95.85±23.52 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 107.45±8.95 | 111.03±10.87 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 65.55±7.37 | 66.20±7.99 |
| Oxygen saturation (%) | 98.65±1.04 | 98.47±0.94 |
| Cerebral oxygenation-HbO2 (%) | 79.5 (74.5–87.25) | 77.0 (67.5–79.00) |
*data are expressed as median (interquartile range)
Vital signs measured in treated and standard groups.
Differences and 95%CI are derived from repeated measurements models (including main effects for time and groups and their interaction) adjusted for anesthesia time.
| Time | Heart rate (bpm) | Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | Oxygen saturation (%) | Cerebral oxygenation-HbO2 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.4 (-13.6 to 18.5) | -3.9 (-11.6 to 3.9) | -0.9 (-6.9 to 5.1) | -0.4 (-1.1 to 0.2) | 7.1 (1.5 to 12.7) |
| 1 | 7.4 (-4.0 to 18.9) | 1.9 (-6.1 to 10.0) | -1.2 (-7.6 to 5.2) | 2.0 (-3.4 to 7.5) | 4.4 (-2.7 to 11.5) |
| 5 | 6.6 (-2.9 to 16.0) | 3.3 (-4.1 to 10.7) | -1.9 (-9.6 to 5.7) | 2.6 (-2.9 to 8.1) | 3.9 (-2.7 to 10.5) |
| 10 | 15.7 (5.2 to 26.2) | 1.5 (-6.0 to9.0) | 3.5 (-4.4 to 11.4) | -0.3 (-1.0 to 0.5) | 5.9 (0.3 to 11.4) |
| 15 | 7.0 (-3.4 to 17.5) | 2.1 (-6.1 to 10.3) | -2.1–8.5 to 4.2) | 0.2 (-0.4 to 0.9) | 5.0 (-1.0 to 10.9) |
| 20 | 4.7 (-6.5 to 16.0) | 2.4 (-5.9 to 10.8) | 2.9 (-4.6 to 10.5) | -0.1 (-1.0 to 0.7) | 6.6 (0.6 to 12.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig 2Comparison of the model-derived profiles for heart rate (HR), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), oxygen saturation (SpO2), cerebral prefrontal oxygenation (HbO2) in animal-assisted therapy (AAT) and standard (STAND) groups.
All models are adjusted for time of anesthesia
Faces pain scale in animal assisted therapy (AAT) and standard (STAND) groups (p = 0.01).
| Pain levels | Number of patients (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AAT group (n = 20) | STAND group (n = 20) | Total | |
| 0 | 18 (66.67%) | 9 (33.33%) | 27 (100%) |
| 2 | 2 (22.22%) | 7 (77.78%) | 9 (100%) |
| 4 | 0 (0%) | 3 (100%) | 3 (100%) |
| 6 | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) | 1 (100%) |
No differences in analgesic treatment in the first 12 hours post-intervention were recorded in the groups.