Literature DB >> 18294600

Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs.

Marian R Banks1, Lisa M Willoughby, William A Banks.   

Abstract

Loneliness is a common problem in long-term care facilities (LTCF) and previous work has shown that animal-assisted therapy (AAT) can to some degree reverse loneliness. Here, we compared the ability of a living dog (Dog) and a robotic dog (AIBO) to treat loneliness in elderly patients living in LTCF. In comparison with a control group not receiving AAT, both the Dog and AIBO groups had statistically significant improvements in their levels of loneliness. As measured by a modified Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (MLAPS), residents showed high levels of attachment to both the dog and AIBO. Subscale analysis showed that the AIBO group scored lower than the living dog on "animal rights/animal welfare" but not on "general attachment" or "people substituting." However, MLAPS measures did not correlate with changes in loneliness, showing that attachment was not the mechanism by which AAT decreases loneliness. We conclude that interactive robotic dogs can reduce loneliness in residents of LTCF and that residents become attached to these robots. However, level of attachment does not explain the decrease in loneliness associated with AAT conducted with either a living or robotic dog.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18294600     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  56 in total

1.  The comprehensive process model of engagement.

Authors:  Jiska Cohen-Mansfield; Marcia S Marx; Laurence S Freedman; Havi Murad; Natalie G Regier; Khin Thein; Maha Dakheel-Ali
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.105

2.  Clinical practice in nursing homes as a key for progress.

Authors:  J E Morley
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 3.  Aging society and gerontechnology: a solution for an independent living?

Authors:  A Piau; E Campo; P Rumeau; B Vellas; F Nourhashémi
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Understanding the Potential of PARO for Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Sean A McGlynn; Shawn Kemple; Tracy L Mitzner; Chih-Hung Aaron King; Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Stud       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.632

5.  [Emotional robots in a nursing context : Empirical analysis of the present use and the effects of Paro and Pleo].

Authors:  Stefanie Baisch; Thorsten Kolling; Saskia Rühl; Barbara Klein; Johannes Pantel; Frank Oswald; Monika Knopf
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.281

6.  The intervention of robot caregivers and the cultivation of children's capability to play.

Authors:  Yvette Pearson; Jason Borenstein
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  The value of social attributes of stimuli for promoting engagement in persons with dementia.

Authors:  Jiska Cohen-Mansfield; Khin Thein; Maha Dakheel-Ali; Natalie G Regier; Marcia S Marx
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.254

8.  The impact of different dog-related stimuli on engagement of persons with dementia.

Authors:  Marcia S Marx; Jiska Cohen-Mansfield; Natalie G Regier; Maha Dakheel-Ali; Ashok Srihari; Khin Thein
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 2.035

9.  Dignity, Autonomy, and Style of Company: Dimensions Older Adults Consider for Robot Companions.

Authors:  Simon Coghlan; Jenny Waycott; Amanda Lazar; Barbara Barbosa Neves
Journal:  Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact       Date:  2021-04

10.  Who Sees Human? The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism.

Authors:  Adam Waytz; John Cacioppo; Nicholas Epley
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.