Literature DB >> 26039328

Biological Impact of Transpulmonary Driving Pressure in Experimental Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Cynthia S Samary1, Raquel S Santos, Cíntia L Santos, Nathane S Felix, Maira Bentes, Thiago Barboza, Vera L Capelozzi, Marcelo M Morales, Cristiane S N B Garcia, Sergio A L Souza, John J Marini, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Pedro L Silva, Paolo Pelosi, Patricia R M Rocco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-induced lung injury has been attributed to the interaction of several factors: tidal volume (VT), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), transpulmonary driving pressure (difference between transpulmonary pressure at end-inspiration and end-expiration, ΔP,L), and respiratory system plateau pressure (Pplat,rs).
METHODS: Forty-eight Wistar rats received Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide intratracheally. After 24 h, animals were randomized into combinations of VT and PEEP, yielding three different ΔP,L levels: ΔP,LLOW (VT = 6 ml/kg, PEEP = 3 cm H2O); ΔP,LMEAN (VT = 13 ml/kg, PEEP = 3 cm H2O or VT = 6 ml/kg, PEEP = 9.5 cm H2O); and ΔP,LHIGH (VT = 22 ml/kg, PEEP = 3 cm H2O or VT = 6 ml/kg, PEEP = 11 cm H2O). In other groups, at low VT, PEEP was adjusted to obtain a Pplat,rs similar to that achieved with ΔP,LMEAN and ΔP,LHIGH at high VT.
RESULTS: At ΔP,LLOW, expressions of interleukin (IL)-6, receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), and amphiregulin were reduced, despite morphometric evidence of alveolar collapse. At ΔP,LHIGH (VT = 6 ml/kg and PEEP = 11 cm H2O), lungs were fully open and IL-6 and RAGE were reduced compared with ΔP,LMEAN (27.4 ± 12.9 vs. 41.6 ± 14.1 and 0.6 ± 0.2 vs. 1.4 ± 0.3, respectively), despite increased hyperinflation and amphiregulin expression. At ΔP,LMEAN (VT = 6 ml/kg and PEEP = 9.5 cm H2O), when PEEP was not high enough to keep lungs open, IL-6, RAGE, and amphiregulin expression increased compared with ΔP,LLOW (41.6 ± 14.1 vs. 9.0 ± 9.8, 1.4 ± 0.3 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2, and 6.7 ± 0.8 vs. 2.2 ± 1.0, respectively). At Pplat,rs similar to that achieved with ΔP,LMEAN and ΔP,LHIGH, higher VT and lower PEEP reduced IL-6 and RAGE expression.
CONCLUSION: In the acute respiratory distress syndrome model used in this experiment, two strategies minimized ventilator-induced lung injury: (1) low VT and PEEP, yielding low ΔP,L and Pplat,rs; and (2) low VT associated with a PEEP level sufficient to keep the lungs open.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26039328     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  25 in total

1.  One more brick in the wall of protective ventilation in surgical patients.

Authors:  Roberto Rabello Filho; Ary Serpa Neto
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  The basics of respiratory mechanics: ventilator-derived parameters.

Authors:  Pedro Leme Silva; Patricia R M Rocco
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-10

Review 3.  ARDS: what experimental models have taught us.

Authors:  Patricia R M Rocco; Gary F Nieman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Effects of peep on lung injury, pulmonary function, systemic circulation and mortality in animals with uninjured lungs-a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Geke Algera; Luigi Pisani; Renato Carneiro de Freitas Chaves; Thiago Chaves Amorim; Thomas Cherpanath; Rogier Determann; Dave A Dongelmans; Frederique Paulus; Pieter Roel Tuinman; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Marcus J Schultz; Ary Serpa Neto
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

Review 5.  The promises and problems of transpulmonary pressure measurements in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Sarina K Sahetya; Roy G Brower
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.687

6.  Impact of different frequencies of controlled breath and pressure-support levels during biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation on the lung and diaphragm in experimental mild acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Alessandra F Thompson; Lillian Moraes; Nazareth N Rocha; Marcos V S Fernandes; Mariana A Antunes; Soraia C Abreu; Cintia L Santos; Vera L Capelozzi; Cynthia S Samary; Marcelo G de Abreu; Felipe Saddy; Paolo Pelosi; Pedro L Silva; Patricia R M Rocco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Recruitment maneuvers for acute respiratory distress syndrome: the panorama in 2016.

Authors:  Pedro Leme Silva; Paolo Pelosi; Patricia Rieken Macêdo Rocco
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016-06

8.  Associations between positive end-expiratory pressure and outcome of patients without ARDS at onset of ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ary Serpa Neto; Roberto Rabello Filho; Thomas Cherpanath; Rogier Determann; Dave A Dongelmans; Frederique Paulus; Pieter Roel Tuinman; Paolo Pelosi; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Marcus J Schultz
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  Comparison between effects of pressure support and pressure-controlled ventilation on lung and diaphragmatic damage in experimental emphysema.

Authors:  Gisele de A Padilha; Lucas F B Horta; Lillian Moraes; Cassia L Braga; Milena V Oliveira; Cíntia L Santos; Isalira P Ramos; Marcelo M Morales; Vera Luiza Capelozzi; Regina C S Goldenberg; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Paolo Pelosi; Pedro L Silva; Patricia R M Rocco
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2016-10-19

10.  The impact of fluid status and decremental PEEP strategy on cardiac function and lung and kidney damage in mild-moderate experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Nazareth N Rocha; Cynthia S Samary; Mariana A Antunes; Milena V Oliveira; Matheus R Hemerly; Patrine S Santos; Vera L Capelozzi; Fernanda F Cruz; John J Marini; Pedro L Silva; Paolo Pelosi; Patricia R M Rocco
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.