Sarina K Sahetya1, Roy G Brower. 1. Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The optimal strategy for assessing and preventing ventilator-induced lung injury in the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is controversial. Recent investigative efforts have focused on personalizing ventilator settings to individual respiratory mechanics. This review examines the strengths and weaknesses of using transpulmonary pressure measurements to guide ventilator management in ARDS. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent clinical studies suggest that adjusting ventilator settings based on transpulmonary pressure measurements is feasible, may improve oxygenation, and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury. SUMMARY: The measurement of transpulmonary pressure relies upon esophageal manometry, which requires the acceptance of several assumptions and potential errors. Notably, this includes the ability of localized esophageal pressures to represent global pleural pressure. Recent investigations demonstrated improved oxygenation in ARDS patients when positive end-expiratory pressure was adjusted to target specific end-inspiratory or end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures. However, there are different methods for estimating transpulmonary pressure and different goals for positive end-expiratory pressure titration among recent studies. More research is needed to refine techniques for the estimation and utilization of transpulmonary pressure to guide ventilator settings in ARDS patients.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The optimal strategy for assessing and preventing ventilator-induced lung injury in the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is controversial. Recent investigative efforts have focused on personalizing ventilator settings to individual respiratory mechanics. This review examines the strengths and weaknesses of using transpulmonary pressure measurements to guide ventilator management in ARDS. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent clinical studies suggest that adjusting ventilator settings based on transpulmonary pressure measurements is feasible, may improve oxygenation, and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury. SUMMARY: The measurement of transpulmonary pressure relies upon esophageal manometry, which requires the acceptance of several assumptions and potential errors. Notably, this includes the ability of localized esophageal pressures to represent global pleural pressure. Recent investigations demonstrated improved oxygenation in ARDSpatients when positive end-expiratory pressure was adjusted to target specific end-inspiratory or end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures. However, there are different methods for estimating transpulmonary pressure and different goals for positive end-expiratory pressure titration among recent studies. More research is needed to refine techniques for the estimation and utilization of transpulmonary pressure to guide ventilator settings in ARDSpatients.
Authors: Salvatore Grasso; Pierpaolo Terragni; Alberto Birocco; Rosario Urbino; Lorenzo Del Sorbo; Claudia Filippini; Luciana Mascia; Antonio Pesenti; Alberto Zangrillo; Luciano Gattinoni; V Marco Ranieri Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-02-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Cynthia S Samary; Raquel S Santos; Cíntia L Santos; Nathane S Felix; Maira Bentes; Thiago Barboza; Vera L Capelozzi; Marcelo M Morales; Cristiane S N B Garcia; Sergio A L Souza; John J Marini; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Pedro L Silva; Paolo Pelosi; Patricia R M Rocco Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Pablo O Rodriguez; Ignacio Bonelli; Mariano Setten; Shiry Attie; Matias Madorno; Luis P Maskin; Ricardo Valentini Journal: Respir Care Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.258
Authors: Stephen H Loring; Carl R O'Donnell; Negin Behazin; Atul Malhotra; Todd Sarge; Ray Ritz; Victor Novack; Daniel Talmor Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2009-12-17
Authors: Roy G Brower; Paul N Lanken; Neil MacIntyre; Michael A Matthay; Alan Morris; Marek Ancukiewicz; David Schoenfeld; B Taylor Thompson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-07-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel Talmor; Todd Sarge; Atul Malhotra; Carl R O'Donnell; Ray Ritz; Alan Lisbon; Victor Novack; Stephen H Loring Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Justin C Hotz; Cary T Sodetani; Jeffrey Van Steenbergen; Robinder G Khemani; Timothy W Deakers; Christopher J Newth Journal: Respir Care Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 2.258
Authors: Chitaru Kurihara; James M Walter; Benjamin D Singer; Hector Cajigas; Shahriar Shayan; Abbas Al-Qamari; Malcolm M DeCamp; Rich Wunderink; G R Scott Budinger; Ankit Bharat Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Davide Chiumello; Dario Consonni; Silvia Coppola; Sara Froio; Francesco Crimella; Andrea Colombo Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: Jeffrey Javidfar; Akram M Zaaqoq; Michael H Yamashita; Greg Eschun; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Silver Heinsar; Jeremiah W Hayanga; Giles J Peek; Rakesh C Arora Journal: JTCVS Tech Date: 2021-10-28