Literature DB >> 26038547

Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being.

Tim M Daw1, Sarah Coulthard2, William W L Cheung3, Katrina Brown4, Caroline Abunge5, Diego Galafassi6, Garry D Peterson6, Tim R McClanahan7, Johnstone O Omukoto8, Lydiah Munyi9.   

Abstract

Managing ecosystems for multiple ecosystem services and balancing the well-being of diverse stakeholders involves different kinds of trade-offs. Often trade-offs involve noneconomic and difficult-to-evaluate values, such as cultural identity, employment, the well-being of poor people, or particular species or ecosystem structures. Although trade-offs need to be considered for successful environmental management, they are often overlooked in favor of win-wins. Management and policy decisions demand approaches that can explicitly acknowledge and evaluate diverse trade-offs. We identified a diversity of apparent trade-offs in a small-scale tropical fishery when ecological simulations were integrated with participatory assessments of social-ecological system structure and stakeholders' well-being. Despite an apparent win-win between conservation and profitability at the aggregate scale, food production, employment, and well-being of marginalized stakeholders were differentially influenced by management decisions leading to trade-offs. Some of these trade-offs were suggested to be "taboo" trade-offs between morally incommensurable values, such as between profits and the well-being of marginalized women. These were not previously recognized as management issues. Stakeholders explored and deliberated over trade-offs supported by an interactive "toy model" representing key system trade-offs, alongside qualitative narrative scenarios of the future. The concept of taboo trade-offs suggests that psychological bias and social sensitivity may exclude key issues from decision making, which can result in policies that are difficult to implement. Our participatory modeling and scenarios approach has the potential to increase awareness of such trade-offs, promote discussion of what is acceptable, and potentially identify and reduce obstacles to management compliance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coral reef fisheries; ecosystem-based management; gender; participatory modeling; scenarios

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26038547      PMCID: PMC4460479          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414900112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  13 in total

1.  Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions.

Authors:  Philip E. Tetlock
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldstein; Giorgio Caldarone; Thomas Kaeo Duarte; Driss Ennaanay; Neil Hannahs; Guillermo Mendoza; Stephen Polasky; Stacie Wolny; Gretchen C Daily
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of fisheries closures and gear restrictions on fishing income in a Kenyan coral reef.

Authors:  Timothy R McClanahan
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Acknowledging conservation trade-offs and embracing complexity.

Authors:  Paul D Hirsch; William M Adams; J Peter Brosius; Asim Zia; Nino Bariola; Juan Luis Dammert
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Bringing values and deliberation to science communication.

Authors:  Thomas Dietz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Malthusian overfishing and efforts to overcome it on Kenyan coral reefs.

Authors:  Tim R McClanahan; Christina C Hicks; Emily S Darling
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent trade-offs among social equity, economic return, and conservation.

Authors:  Benjamin S Halpern; Carissa J Klein; Christopher J Brown; Maria Beger; Hedley S Grantham; Sangeeta Mangubhai; Mary Ruckelshaus; Vivitskaia J Tulloch; Matt Watts; Crow White; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  How serious are expressions of protected values?

Authors:  J Baron; S Leshner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2000-09

9.  Connecting marine ecosystem services to human well-being: insights from participatory well-being assessment in Kenya.

Authors:  Caroline Abunge; Sarah Coulthard; Tim M Daw
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.129

10.  Assessing gear modifications needed to optimize yields in a heavily exploited, multi-species, seagrass and coral reef fishery.

Authors:  Christina C Hicks; Timothy R McClanahan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  How humans drive speciation as well as extinction.

Authors:  J W Bull; M Maron
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts.

Authors:  Denise Margaret S Matias; Julia Leventon; Anna-Lena Rau; Christian Borgemeister; Henrik von Wehrden
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Human health alters the sustainability of fishing practices in East Africa.

Authors:  Kathryn J Fiorella; Erin M Milner; Charles R Salmen; Matthew D Hickey; Dan O Omollo; Abdi Odhiambo; Brian Mattah; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Lia C H Fernald; Justin S Brashares
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  What Happens after Conservation and Management Donors Leave? A Before and After Study of Coral Reef Ecology and Stakeholder Perceptions of Management Benefits.

Authors:  Timothy R McClanahan; Nyawira A Muthiga; Caroline Abunge; Albogast T Kamukuru; Eliezer Mwakalapa; Hassan Kalombo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessing trade-offs in large marine protected areas.

Authors:  Tammy E Davies; Graham Epstein; Stacy E Aguilera; Cassandra M Brooks; Michael Cox; Louisa S Evans; Sara M Maxwell; Mateja Nenadovic; Natalie C Ban
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Projected losses of ecosystem services in the US disproportionately affect non-white and lower-income populations.

Authors:  Jesse D Gourevitch; Aura M Alonso-Rodríguez; Natalia Aristizábal; Luz A de Wit; Eva Kinnebrew; Caitlin E Littlefield; Maya Moore; Charles C Nicholson; Aaron J Schwartz; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  A Sustainability Compass for policy navigation to sustainable food systems.

Authors:  Aniek Hebinck; Monika Zurek; Thom Achterbosch; Björn Forkman; Anneleen Kuijsten; Marijke Kuiper; Birgit Nørrung; Pieter van 't Veer; Adrian Leip
Journal:  Glob Food Sec       Date:  2021-06

8.  The Association Between the Special Subsidy for Families Practicing Family Planning and the Mental Health of Loss/Disability-of-Single-Child Parents: Evidence from China.

Authors:  Enjian Wang; Hongwei Hu; Yang Xu; Hongting Liu; Bai Yang; Ruihui Chang; Wei Jiang
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2021-03

9.  Mapping regional livelihood benefits from local ecosystem services assessments in rural Sahel.

Authors:  Katja Malmborg; Hanna Sinare; Elin Enfors Kautsky; Issa Ouedraogo; Line J Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An Exploration of Human Well-Being Bundles as Identifiers of Ecosystem Service Use Patterns.

Authors:  Maike Hamann; Reinette Biggs; Belinda Reyers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.