Nahuel Fittipaldi1, Gregory J Tyrrell2, Donald E Low3, Irene Martin4, David Lin5, Kumar L Hari5, James M Musser1. 1. Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, The Methodist Hospital, and Center for Molecular and Translational Human Infectious Disease Research, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute , Houston, TX 77030, USA. 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, and Provincial Laboratory for Public Health (Microbiology) , Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2J2, Canada. 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto and Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Hospital , Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada. 4. National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada , Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 3R2, Canada. 5. cBio Inc. , Fremont, CA 94536, USA.
Abstract
Analysis of microbial epidemics has been revolutionized by whole-genome sequencing. We recently sequenced the genomes of 601 type emm59 Group A Streptococcus (GAS) organisms responsible for an ongoing epidemic of invasive infections in Canada and some of the United States. The epidemic has been caused by the emergence of a genetically distinct, hypervirulent clone that has genetically diversified. The ease of obtaining genomic data contrasts with the relatively difficult task of translating them into insightful epidemiological information. Here, we sequenced the genomes of 90 additional invasive Canadian emm59 GAS organisms, including 80 isolated recently in 2010-2011. We used an improved bioinformatics pipeline designed to rapidly process and analyze whole-genome data and integrate strain metadata. We discovered that emm59 GAS organisms are undergoing continued multiclonal evolutionary expansion. Previously identified geographic patterns of strain dissemination are being diluted as mixing of subclones over time and space occurs. Our integrated data analysis strategy permits prompt and accurate mapping of the dissemination of bacterial organisms in an epidemic wave, permitting rapid generation of hypotheses that inform public health and virulence studies.
Analysis of microbial epidemics has been revolutionized by whole-genome sequencing. We recently sequenced the genomes of 601 type emm59 Group A Streptococcus (GAS) organisms responsible for an ongoing epidemic of invasive infections in Canada and some of the United States. The epidemic has been caused by the emergence of a genetically distinct, hypervirulent clone that has genetically diversified. The ease of obtaining genomic data contrasts with the relatively difficult task of translating them into insightful epidemiological information. Here, we sequenced the genomes of 90 additional invasive Canadian emm59 GAS organisms, including 80 isolated recently in 2010-2011. We used an improved bioinformatics pipeline designed to rapidly process and analyze whole-genome data and integrate strain metadata. We discovered that emm59 GAS organisms are undergoing continued multiclonal evolutionary expansion. Previously identified geographic patterns of strain dissemination are being diluted as mixing of subclones over time and space occurs. Our integrated data analysis strategy permits prompt and accurate mapping of the dissemination of bacterial organisms in an epidemic wave, permitting rapid generation of hypotheses that inform public health and virulence studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Canada; United States; bacterial epidemics; group A Streptococcus; invasive disease; whole-genome sequencing
The recent unparalleled discriminatory power afforded by whole-genome sequencing has proven decisive for understanding aspects of bacterial outbreaks, including cholera,[1,2] tuberculosis,[3]
Listeria monocytogenes,[4]
Escherichia coli O104[5,6] and Group A Streptococcus (GAS also known as streptococcus pyogenes).[7,8,9] Decreasing costs, enhanced data output and improved protocols now make this technology the method of choice for some aspects of public health microbiology.[10,11,12] The ease of obtaining genome data permits the study of the evolutionary events contributing to bacterial clone emergence, strain differentiation, and epidemics at the full-chromosomal level in large samples.[13] Toward this end, we have used whole-genome sequencing of GAS as a model to understand the fine-structure and molecular architecture of epidemics occurring over many years.[7,8]GAS is a human-specific pathogen that causes diseases ranging in severity from uncomplicated pharyngitis to life-threatening necrotizing fasciitis.[14] GAS strains are classified based on the aminoterminal sequence of the M protein, a polymorphic cell-surface adhesin and anti-phagocytic factor encoded by the emm gene.[15,16,17] Previously, we have used deep-genome sequencing data for 95 emm3 GAS strains integrated with epidemiological information to resolve the key molecular features of three successive epidemics caused by emm3GAS in Ontario, Canada, over a period of 16 years.[7] This comparative pathogenomic analysis delineated the fine-structure molecular population genetics of these epidemics and defined relationships among the invasive strains responsible for the three epidemics.More recently, using animal infection models and whole-genome sequencing of 601 emm59 GAS strains, we unambiguously demonstrated that a recently emerged, hypervirulent clone was responsible for a large epidemic of invasive GAS disease that began in 2006 in Western Canada and caused more than 500 invasive cases in 4 years. The epidemic wave extended rapidly to 11 Canadian provinces and territories and to three of the United States.[8,18] The epidemic clone was distantly related to historic emm59 GAS strains, and also differed from emm59 GAS organisms isolated in other countries.[8,19] Our genomic investigation precisely informed us about the population genomic landscape of the emm59 GAS epidemic, and permitted us to delineate patterns of geographic dissemination of strains in widely-dispersed areas. We also discovered that, as a population, the emm59 epidemic isolates have accumulated relatively few genetic polymorphisms over the years since sharing a common ancestor. One hypothesis to explain this finding is that over the course of the four years represented by the emm59 strain sample used in that previous study, sufficient time has not elapsed to produce considerable genomic differentiation. Extending the genomic analysis by incorporating whole-genome data for epidemic strains more recently isolated will help to differentiate between this and other hypotheses.Despite the ability to sequence bacterial genomes rapidly, translating the whole-genome data into insightful epidemiological findings remains relatively time consuming and requires intensive logistical and computing resources.[13] In addition, incorporating critical strain or patient metadata into the analysis, and displaying the data in a more visual, intuitive and integrative fashion is challenging. Collectively, these problems hinder the clinical and public health responses to natural and accidental outbreaks, and deliberate release of infectious agents. Thus, methods to rapidly translate genome data into accurate, epidemiologically relevant information in a short period of time are needed. Here, we have attempted to address these limitations by use of whole-genome data from additional strains recovered from the ongoing emm59 GAS epidemic. Whole-genome data for 90 additional emm59 GAS strains isolated in Canada were generated and integrated into an improved pipeline for data processing and visualization. We show here that pertinent epidemiological information can be obtained rapidly and economically in meaningful clinical and public health situations.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains
The strain collection includes 691 emm59 strains of different origins. 601 of these strains have been described in detail recently.[8] The additional 90 strains (Table 1) were all isolated in Canada from patients with invasive GAS infections. One of these strains was isolated in 1993 in Ontario, and is thus far the oldest identified Canadian emm59 GAS organism. Nine strains were isolated during 2006–2009, the period of time covered by our previous report on the emm59 epidemic,[8] but had not been included in the previous study. The vast majority (n=80) of the newly analyzed strains were isolated in 2010 and 2011.
Table 1
Type emm59 GAS strains incorporated in this study
ID
Strain name
Isolation date
Province
Source
1
MGAS23789
Oct-10
Alberta
Neck tissue
2
MGAS23790
Jan-10
Alberta
Blood
3
MGAS23791
Jul-11
Alberta
Bursa Lt olecranon
4
MGAS23792
Mar-11
Alberta
Knee fluid
5
MGAS23793
Jul-10
Alberta
Synovial elbow
6
MGAS23794
Feb-10
Alberta
Blood
7
MGAS23795
Apr-11
Alberta
Blood
8
MGAS23796
Mar-11
Alberta
Blood
9
MGAS23798
Mar-10
Alberta
Blood
10
MGAS23800
Aug-10
Alberta
Blood
11
MGAS23801
Apr-10
Alberta
Knee fluid
12
MGAS23802
Apr-10
Alberta
Blood
13
MGAS23803
Dec-10
Alberta
Blood
14
MGAS23805
Apr-10
Alberta
Blood
15
MGAS23806
Jul-10
Alberta
Leg Rt
16
MGAS23808
Nov-10
Alberta
Blood
17
MGAS23809
Mar-11
Alberta
Blood
18
MGAS23810
Mar-11
Alberta
Blood
19
MGAS23811
Nov-10
Alberta
Blood peripheral
20
MGAS23812
May-11
Alberta
Blood
21
MGAS23813
Feb-10
Alberta
Abscess chest wall
22
MGAS23814
Feb-11
Alberta
Blood
23
MGAS23815
Nov-10
Alberta
Blood
24
MGAS23816
Nov-10
Alberta
Tissue axilla abscess
25
MGAS23817
Jun-10
Alberta
Abscess neck
26
MGAS23818
Nov-10
Alberta
Blood
27
MGAS23819
Nov-10
Alberta
Blood
28
MGAS23787
Jan-10
British Columbia
Synovial fluid
29
MGAS23797
Dec-09
British Columbia
Blood
30
MGAS23799
Mar-10
British Columbia
Peritoneal
31
MGAS24513
Jun-10
British Columbia
Blood
32
MGAS24520
Oct-10
British Columbia
Undetermined sterile site
33
MGAS24522
Nov-10
British Columbia
Blood
34
MGAS24527
Dec-10
British Columbia
Undetermined sterile site
35
MGAS24530
Feb-11
British Columbia
Blood
36
MGAS24533
Jun-11
British Columbia
Blood
37
MGAS24535
Jul-11
British Columbia
Synovial fluid
38
MGAS24537
Aug-11
British Columbia
Blood
39
MGAS24541
Aug-11
British Columbia
Synovial fluid
40
MGAS24542
Aug-11
British Columbia
Blood
41
MGAS24509
Apr-10
Manitoba
Undetermined sterile site
42
MGAS24512
Jun-10
Manitoba
Not given
43
MGAS24525
Dec-10
Manitoba
Undetermined sterile site
44
MGAS24538
Aug-11
Manitoba
Abscess
45
MGAS24540
Aug-11
Manitoba
Synovial fluid
46
MGAS25517
Sep-10
Manitoba
Blood
47
MGAS24516
Aug-10
Northwest Territories
Blood
48
MGAS24510
May-10
Nunavut
Blood
49
MGAS23788
Jan-10
Ontario
Blood
50
MGAS23804
Feb-10
Ontario
Fluid Rt knee
51
MGAS24220
Dec-93
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
52
MGAS24223
Mar-06
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
53
MGAS24224
Jun-06
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
54
MGAS24225
Dec-06
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
55
MGAS24226
May-08
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
56
MGAS24227
Oct-08
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
57
MGAS24229
Mar-09
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
58
MGAS24230
Dec-09
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
59
MGAS24232
Feb-10
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
60
MGAS24233
Jul-10
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
61
MGAS24234
Aug-10
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
62
MGAS24235
Jul-10
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
63
MGAS24236
Nov-10
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
64
MGAS24237
May-11
Ontario
Undetermined sterile site
65
MGAS24511
May-10
Ontario
Not given
66
MGAS24514
Jul-10
Ontario
Blood
67
MGAS24529
Feb-11
Ontario
Blood
68
MGAS24544
Sep-11
Ontario
Blood
69
MGAS24545
Sep-11
Ontario
Blood
70
MGAS24547
Oct-11
Ontario
Synovial fluid
71
MGAS23524
Nov-10
Quebec
Synovial fluid
72
MGAS23786
Jan-10
Quebec
Blood
73
MGAS23807
Dec-09
Quebec
Blood
74
MGAS24507
Mar-10
Quebec
Blood
75
MGAS24508
Feb-10
Quebec
Blood
76
MGAS24518
Oct-10
Quebec
Blood
77
MGAS24523
Nov-10
Quebec
Blood
78
MGAS24526
Dec-10
Quebec
Blood
79
MGAS24528
Dec-10
Quebec
Blood
80
MGAS24531
Mar-11
Quebec
Blood
81
MGAS24532
Mar-11
Quebec
Synovial fluid
82
MGAS24534
Jun-11
Quebec
Undetermined sterile site
83
MGAS24536
Aug-11
Quebec
Blood
84
MGAS24543
Aug-11
Quebec
Synovial fluid
85
MGAS24546
Oct-11
Quebec
Blood
86
MGAS24548
Oct-11
Quebec
Blood
87
MGAS24505
Jan-10
Saskatchewan
Blood
88
MGAS24506
Mar-10
Saskatchewan
Blood
89
MGAS24515
Aug-10
Saskatchewan
Blood
90
MGAS24519
Oct-10
Saskatchewan
Blood
Abbreviations: Lt, left; Rt, right.
Whole-genome sequencing
DNA was extracted from each of the 90 emm59 GAS isolates and prepared for multiplexed (barcoded) sequencing as previously described.[9] Genome sequence data were obtained using an Illumina HiSeq2000 instrument according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Bioinformatic analysis
Bioinformatic analysis was performed using a customized version of the Galaxy Suite[20,21,22] running on the Amazon cloud. Namely, we created a pipeline composed of Tagdust,[23] FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) and FastX (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/) toolkits, and used it to parse multiplexed sequencing reads, remove barcode information and perform run quality control analyses. Polymorphism discovery was performed using Variant Ascertainment Algorithm.[24] Reads were aligned to the emm59 GAS strainMGAS15252 (GenBank accession number CP003116) reference genome using the Mosaik assembler (http://bioinformatics.bc.edu/marthlab/Mosaik). This strain was isolated in Canada in 2008 and its genome sequenced to closure previously; thus becoming the de facto reference genome for type emm59 GAS epidemic strains.[8] Unaligned reads were placed into contigs using the Velvet de novo assembler.[25] Contigs greater than 100 nucleotides in length were then used to search the NCBI non-redundant database using BLAST.[26]
Phylogenetic analysis
A matrix file containing the genotype of all strains at each polymorphic locus was created from the Variant Ascertainment Algorithm polymorphism output data using a custom script. Insertions and deletions (indels) were not considered for phylogenetic analysis. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were concatenated in order of occurrence relative to the reference genome and converted to a multiFASTA sequence. ClustalW[27] was used to align and generate a guide tree for the FASTA sequences. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic trees followed by bootstrap analysis of 1000 replicates were created using SplitsTree[28] and graphically edited with TreeDyn.[29] The Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree for Canadian epidemic strains isolated 2006–2011 was exported to Path-O-Gen v1.3 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/pathogen) and a linear regression plot for isolation date versus root-to-tip distance was generated as described by Mutreja et al.[30]
Data visualizations
Visualizations were created using the resources offered by cBio Inc.'s Pathogen Annotated Tracking Resource Network located at http://www.patrn.net/. Illustrations were created using TIBCO Spotfire and Adobe Illustrator.
Results
Invasive infections caused by emm59 GAS remain abundant in Canada
We reported previously that emm59 GAS strains were almost non-existent in Canada before 2006, but caused more than 500 invasive infections countrywide from that date until early 2010.[8,18] The epidemic reached its peak in 2008, after which the number of cases began to decline (Figure 1A). However, emm59 GAS strains continued to cause invasive infections, with 56 newly identified cases in 2010 (total of 70 cases for 2010), and 32 cases in 2011. Since surveillance for GAS is passive in Canada, the actual number of emm59 GAS invasive cases is likely to have been higher in the period under investigation. During 2010 and 2011, cases occurred in vastly dispersed geographical areas covering most of the country (Figure 1B).
Figure 1
Number of emm59 GAS recorded cases in Canada and their geographic distribution since the beginning of the epidemic. (A) The epidemic began in year 2006 and reached its peak in 2008. By that year, cases of invasive disease were recorded over the vast majority of the country. The number of cases started to decline since 2009. However, in years 2010 and 2011, strains could still be recovered in relatively large numbers. (B) Temporospatial display of strain origin. Provinces in which emm59 GAS strains were isolated are color coded based on the number of strain isolated each year. Numbers indicate the exact number of strains isolated in a particular year in each province.
The oldest Canadian emm59 GAS strain identified is not the immediate ancestor of the epidemic emm59 clone
Our previous genome investigation of emm59 GAS strains recovered in Canada unambiguously demonstrated that regardless of geographic location or year of isolation, epidemic Canadian emm59 strains have descended from a recent, single ancestral cell that underwent rapid geographic dissemination.[8] The last common ancestor remains unidentified, but it was remarkable that the genomes of the epidemic strains and those of the only seven emm59 strains isolated in Canada before the epidemic began (1997–2004) were closely related.[8] We sequenced here the genome of an emm59 strain isolated in Canada in 1993, thus far the oldest Canadian emm59 organism identified. The genome sequence data show that this strain is genetically distantly related to the epidemic strains and thus is not the recent ancestor. Indeed, compared to reference epidemic strain MGAS15252, the 1993 emm59 GAS strain had 194 SNPs and 20 indels in the core genome (i.e., the ∼1670 kbp portion of the genome lacking mobile genetic elements that is conserved in gene content across all sequenced emm GAS types[31]). Phylogenetic analysis using SNP data for the core genomes found that this historic Canadian isolate also is not closely related to non-epidemic emm59 GAS organisms isolated in other geographic locations such as the United States, Japan or Spain (Figure 2A).
Figure 2
(A) Inferred genetic relationships among strains based on 1443 concatenated SNP loci identified by whole-genome sequencing. Newly sequenced strains all cluster within the epidemic clonal complex, with the exception of a Canadian emm59 GAS strain isolated in 1993. This strain is also genetically distant from invasive strains from Spain, Japan and the United States. Scale bar represents genetic distance. (B) Magnification of the epidemic complex part of the tree, showing the geographical area of isolation (Canadian province or US state). Strains recovered during years 2010–2011 are highlighted. In general, these more recent strains are found in the outermost part of every tree branch.
Comparative genome sequencing of new Canadian epidemic emm59 strains
The 89 additional emm59 GAS Canadian organisms differed from the reference strain, on average, by 10 SNPs and 3.4 indels (median 12 SNPs, 3 indels). The notable exception was strain MGAS24525, isolated in Manitoba in 2010, which had 465 SNPs and 71 indels relative to the reference strain. However, the vast majority of these polymorphisms mapped to mobile genetic elements, namely, prophages present in the reference sequence. Indeed, compared with the core genome of the reference strain, the number of polymorphisms was reduced to only 30 SNPs and 5 indels. Moreover, 15 of these 30 SNPs mapped to sequences in close vicinity of prophage boundaries. These results suggest that strain MGAS24525 is a bona fide emm59 GAS epidemic strain that has very recently acquired a different prophage. Phylogenetic analysis using the whole-genome data showed that the Canadian emm59 GAS organisms clustered tightly in the epidemic complex (Figure 2A).
Epidemic Canadian emm59 GAS strains continue to undergo clonal expansion
One of the findings of our previous work was that, as a population, the emm59 epidemic isolates have accumulated relatively few genetic polymorphisms over the years since sharing a last common ancestor. One hypothesis to explain that finding is that over the course of the 4 years represented by the emm59 strains used in the previous study, sufficient time has not elapsed to produce considerable genomic differentiation. Adding to the analysis data for 80 additional strains isolated in 2010–2011 provided us with the ability to test the hypothesis over a period of time of almost 6 years. Phylogenetic analysis of strains isolated during 2010–2011 found that these recent strains were located, in general, toward the tip of multiple branches of the phylogenetic tree, implying that they have accumulated additional SNPs compared to emm59 GAS organisms isolated previously (Figure 2B). When we divided the strain collection based on isolation year and calculated the average number of SNPs separating the epidemic strains isolated in a given year from the reference strain, we noticed an increase in the number of polymorphisms differentiating the epidemic strains from the reference strain over time. For example, epidemic strains recovered in 2006 differed from the reference genome, on average, by 7.6 SNPs, whereas strains isolated in 2011 differed, on average, by 13.1 SNPs. To test the hypothesis in more detail, we performed a linear regression analysis on all epidemic strains isolated since 2006 to calculate the rate of SNP accumulation on the basis of the date of isolation and the root-to-tip distance. Consistent with the hypothesis, linear regression analysis showed a steady rate of SNP accumulation (R2=0.6067; Figure 3) in the core genome.
Figure 3
Linear regression plot showing the correlation (R2) between the root-to-tip distance (y-axis) and the date of the epidemic strains (x-axis).
Use of whole-genome data to study temporospatial spread of emm59 GAS subclones
Among the critical questions that whole-genome sequencing and subsequent phylogenetic analyses can address is whether an apparent epidemic represents the emergence of a single distinct genotype, or, instead, it is caused by multiple clones that emerged simultaneously. In our initial investigation, we unambiguously demonstrated the emm59 GAS epidemic was caused by the emergence of a distinct genetic clone.[8] The extensive whole-genome data also permitted us to delineate clear patterns of geographic dissemination of derivative subclones.[8] We inferred that these geographic patterns were the result of the rapid spread of subclones in distinct geographic regions of the country. We hypothesized that the geographical patterns will begin to be obscured over time as a result of geographic mixing of subclones linked to human travel. Figure 4A clearly exemplifies how whole-genome data support this hypothesis: a subclone that before 2009 was composed only of strains isolated in the provinces of Alberta and British Columbia has expanded to four other Canadian provinces and territories. Mixing of the subclones is also clearly revealed among strains isolated in Quebec. Type emm59 GAS had been isolated in Quebec in 1996 and 2004, particularly in northern areas of the province. Quebec interrupted the provincial GAS surveillance program during 2005–2009. We discovered that none of the 28 emm59 GAS invasive cases reported in the province since 2009 was caused by direct lineal descendants of the strains originally identified in Quebec. Rather, they were caused by strains of genetically divergent emm59 subclones isolated first in other parts of Canada and subsequently introduced into the province on at least four different occasions (Figure 4B and 4C). Notably, we identified five strains whose genomes were essentially identical. Four of these strains were isolated from patients receiving care in the Montreal area, whereas the fifth was from a patient in Ontario. This is incontrovertible evidence that the strains have shared a very recent common ancestor and, also, most likely represents that the patients infected by these strains were connected to one another, either directly or via an unknown third-party donor. Temporal analysis revealed that the Ontario case was the last to be isolated (Figure 4D), indicating a reversal of the west to east route of transmission identified in our previous study.[8]
Figure 4
(A) Geographic patterns of strains dissemination are diluted as the epidemic progresses over time. The highlighted areas of the tree exemplifies how specific subclones, previously restricted to specific geographical areas of Canada before 2009, are now found over vast regions of the country. Triangles represent emm59 GAS strains not considered for the analysis. (B) Epidemic strains isolated in the province of Quebec since 2009 were introduced into the province in at least five different occasions. Strains from Quebec are depicted in blue and their different locations in the phylogenetic tree highlighted by the black ellipses. With the exception of a ‘native' population of strains isolated before 2006, all cases in the province were the result of the introduction of multiple different emm59 GAS subclones active in other parts of Canada. (C) Introduction of the different genotypes into Quebec can be precisely mapped back to the origin strain. (D) Magnification of a region of the phylogenetic depicting a subclone composed of five strains of identical genome sequence which caused disease in the Montreal area, but was later isolated in the province of Ontario.
Convergent evolution of polymorphisms in virulence genes
The radial structure of the epidemic phylogenetic tree (Figure 2B) suggested that most of the SNPs identified in our strain collection arose once and were transmitted vertically by descent. Polymorphisms that arise independently multiple times are of interest since they may represent genetic changes that are under evolutionary selection because they confer an advantage to the organism. We identified several examples of these polymorphisms, including a single nucleotide deletion in a homopolymeric tract of 7 Ts, predicted to result in premature termination of translation of CovS, the sensor kinase of the two-component regulatory system CovRS. This component regulatory system influences the expression of a large regulon that includes many virulence genes.[32] CovR acts primarily as a transcriptional repressor of virulence genes. Inactivation of covR or covS has been reported to increase GAS virulence in strains of several different emm types.[32] The distribution of this deletion-mutation strongly suggests that it evolved independently on least six different occasions in emm59 GAS strains (Figure 5). We also identified multiple different non-synonymous SNPs in the mga gene which encodes a stand alone global regulator of GAS virulence. Mga is important at several steps of the pathogenesis of the GAS infection, and is required for full GAS virulence in a skin model of infection.[33,34] The phylogenetic distribution of one of these SNPs (resulting in a His201Arg amino-acid replacement) strongly suggests that it arose independently at least six times (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Different polymorphisms arose multiple, independent times. Polymorphism analysis identified that several strains in different branches of the phylogenetic tree present either a nucleotide deletion (del T83) resulting in premature termination of the translation of the global regulator covS (indicated in red) and/or a SNP (A601C) resulting in a nonsynonymous amino acid replacement (His201Arg) in the stand alone regulator Mga (indicated in light blue). These polymorphisms could not have been inherited by descent. Their multiple, independent acquisition within the host suggests that they confer a selective advantage.
Discussion
Our study supports the idea that performing whole-genome sequencing and data interpretation rapidly can have a major impact on the study and management of epidemics. New and improved sequencing systems permit genome sequence data to be generated economically for hundreds of strains in as little as a week. A time frame as short as 1.5 days has been reported for obtaining high-quality genome data for a small number of strains.[35] However, data analysis continues to be a key bottleneck in genome sequence-based investigations.During an epidemic, irrespective of whether it is natural or caused by the accidental or deliberate release of a pathogenic organism, there is substantial pressure to obtain high-quality genome and linked epidemiologic information very rapidly. It is therefore important to identify exactly what is being traced at as high resolution as possible. Important questions to be addressed are: Is this a clonal outbreak or are several pathogen genetic backgrounds involved? What is the nature and extent of organism evolution during the course of the epidemic? Here, using an improved data analysis pipeline, we have been able to accurately identify polymorphisms for 90 strains in less than 24 h after obtaining the raw data from the sequencing instrument. As importantly, we were able to integrate new and preexisting data along with geographical and temporal strain metadata to rapidly generate phylogenetic trees and other visualizations that translated the data into intuitive and insightful epidemiological information. By applying this analysis, we were able to differentiate among emm59 GAS subclones causing disease in different and geographically dispersed parts of Canada, and obtain new information about how these clones are expanding and mixing over time.Two other important issues when studying an epidemic are identifying the origin of the organism(s) causing it and the ability to exclude or confirm genetic modifications. By limiting our analysis to the province of Quebec, we demonstrated that whole-genome sequencing, phylogenetic and temporospatial analysis were able to assign the different cases reported in the province to at least five different subclones of emm59 GAS. Moreover, we unambiguously demonstrated transmission of a particular subclone which has been active for months in the Montreal area to the province of Ontario. This type of crucial information is important for providing input on public health maneuvers, for understanding strain spreading and for inferring whether an epidemic is naturally caused or potentially the result of deliberate release of a pathogenic organism.Whole-genome sequencing of large numbers of strains causing epidemics has also proven useful to characterize many biological properties of the organisms under investigation and is revolutionizing both virulence factor discovery and characterization and our understanding of bacterial pathogenesis.[36,37,38] In our analysis of the emm59 GAS epidemic in Canada, we rapidly identified several polymorphisms that arose multiple, independent times in the strains studied. Among others, we discovered such polymorphisms in global regulators of GAS virulence, such as a nucleotide deletion in the covS gene and a SNP resulting in a non-synonymous amino-acid change at position 201 of the predicted translated sequence of the standalone regulator Mga. Selection within the host of these polymorphisms may denote that they are of importance for the pathogenesis of infection. Although evaluating the potential involvement of these naturally occurring polymorphisms in GAS virulence requires further time and effort, it is worth noting that whole-genome sequencing analysis can lead to the quick generation of research hypothesis bearing on pathogenesis even during the initial analysis of epidemics.In this study, we limited our analysis to genome data and temporospatial isolation information for bacterial strains. It would be possible, however, to rapidly build a well-curated database integrating other metadata such as, for example, disease manifestation and patient information, including patient genome data. Such efforts are currently underway in some clinical settings.[13] Whole-genome sequencing and integrative metadata analysis holds the promise of monitoring the spread and evolution of pathogens in real time, facilitating management of disease and patient treatment and continuing to provide leads for future research aimed at deciphering the virulence arsenal of pathogenic bacteria. The strategy we used here is a step forward in the route toward automation of whole-genome sequencing data analysis and provides a framework upon which to build more intuitive, rapid and precise analytic tools.
Authors: Jennifer L Gardy; James C Johnston; Shannan J Ho Sui; Victoria J Cook; Lena Shah; Elizabeth Brodkin; Shirley Rempel; Richard Moore; Yongjun Zhao; Robert Holt; Richard Varhol; Inanc Birol; Marcus Lem; Meenu K Sharma; Kevin Elwood; Steven J M Jones; Fiona S L Brinkman; Robert C Brunham; Patrick Tang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chen-Shan Chin; Jon Sorenson; Jason B Harris; William P Robins; Richelle C Charles; Roger R Jean-Charles; James Bullard; Dale R Webster; Andrew Kasarskis; Paul Peluso; Ellen E Paxinos; Yoshiharu Yamaichi; Stephen B Calderwood; John J Mekalanos; Eric E Schadt; Matthew K Waldor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-12-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Patrick R Shea; Stephen B Beres; Anthony R Flores; Amy L Ewbank; Javier H Gonzalez-Lugo; Alexandro J Martagon-Rosado; Juan C Martinez-Gutierrez; Hina A Rehman; Monica Serrano-Gonzalez; Nahuel Fittipaldi; Stephen D Ayers; Paul Webb; Barbara M Willey; Donald E Low; James M Musser Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Matthew W Gilmour; Morag Graham; Gary Van Domselaar; Shaun Tyler; Heather Kent; Keri M Trout-Yakel; Oscar Larios; Vanessa Allen; Barbara Lee; Celine Nadon Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Paul E Bernard; Priyanka Kachroo; Luchang Zhu; Stephen B Beres; Jesus M Eraso; Zaid Kajani; S Wesley Long; James M Musser; Randall J Olsen Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Misu Sanson; Brian E O'Neill; Priyanka Kachroo; Jeff R Anderson; Anthony R Flores; Chandni Valson; Concepcion C Cantu; Nishanth Makthal; Christof Karmonik; Nahuel Fittipaldi; Muthiah Kumaraswami; James M Musser; Randall J Olsen Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Taryn B T Athey; Sarah Teatero; Lee E Sieswerda; Jonathan B Gubbay; Alex Marchand-Austin; Aimin Li; Jessica Wasserscheid; Ken Dewar; Allison McGeer; David Williams; Nahuel Fittipaldi Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Randall J Olsen; Anjali Raghuram; Concepcion Cantu; Meredith H Hartman; Francisco E Jimenez; Susan Lee; Ashley Ngo; Kelsey A Rice; Deborah Saddington; Hannaka Spillman; Chandni Valson; Anthony R Flores; Stephen B Beres; S Wesley Long; Waleed Nasser; James M Musser Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Sarah Teatero; Allison McGeer; Gregory J Tyrrell; Linda Hoang; Hanan Smadi; Marc-Christian Domingo; Paul N Levett; Michael Finkelstein; Ken Dewar; Agron Plevneshi; Taryn B T Athey; Jonathan B Gubbay; Michael R Mulvey; Irene Martin; Walter Demczuk; Nahuel Fittipaldi Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: David M Engelthaler; Michael Valentine; Jolene Bowers; Jennifer Pistole; Elizabeth M Driebe; Joel Terriquez; Linus Nienstadt; Mark Carroll; Mare Schumacher; Mary Ellen Ormsby; Shane Brady; Eugene Livar; Del Yazzie; Victor Waddell; Marie Peoples; Kenneth Komatsu; Paul Keim Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Claire E Turner; Luke Bedford; Nicholas M Brown; Kim Judge; M Estée Török; Julian Parkhill; Sharon J Peacock Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Christopher C Brown; Randall J Olsen; Nahuel Fittipaldi; Monica L Morman; Peter L Fort; Robert Neuwirth; Mohammed Majeed; William B Woodward; James M Musser Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 6.883