Literature DB >> 26038069

Evolution of treatment mechanics and contemporary appliance design in orthodontics: A 40-year perspective.

Richard P McLaughlin1, John C Bennett2.   

Abstract

Until the early 1970s, successful treatment with the Begg technique and the Tweed edgewise technique required tedious wire bending. The introduction of Andrews' straight wire appliance changed that, and it was one of the most significant contributions in the history of orthodontics. The straight wire appliance significantly reduced the amount of wire bending and also brought along other options in treatment mechanics. Retraction of the canines with elastic chains and ligature wires became more common. Sliding mechanics in place of closing loops became the method of space closure for a significant number of clinicians. Edgewise force levels were initially used to close spaces; however, it was soon observed that lighter forces were more effective with sliding mechanics. Along with these changes, it became apparent that compensation in the appliance was needed, depending on the type of malocclusion and particularly with varying extraction sequences. Various appliance designs were developed to accommodate changes in mechanics and force levels. These modifications improved tooth positions at the end of treatment as long as the brackets were properly placed. These major changes in appliances, force levels, and treatment mechanics can be traced back to the work of Dr Lawrence Andrews and the straight wire appliances.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26038069     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of slot sizes and parallelism of metal brackets manufactured through metal injection molding and computerized numerical control.

Authors:  Jae-Sung Park; In-Tae Song; Jae-Hee Bae; Soo-Min Gil; Kyung-Hwa Kang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Estimation and comparative evaluation of tip and torque values of Saudis for bracket prescription.

Authors:  Ferdous Bukhary; Mohammed T Bukhary; Sahar Albarakati
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2021-03-14

3.  Computation and Collation of Torque Expression in 0.018 Inch and 0.022 Inch Preadjusted Bracket Slots on Passive Insertion of Full-Size Archwire: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  A Anand Kumar; Sharmila Sekar; S Sathesh Kumar; G Divakar; Kumaran Vijayarangam; S Arulselvi
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2022-07-13

4.  Concentration of dentin sialoprotein at the initial stage of orthodontic treatment using self-ligating and conventional preadjusted brackets: A pilot study.

Authors:  Muhammad Sulaiman Kusumah Adiwirya; Retno Widayati; Nurtami Soedarsono; Haru Setyo Anggani
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-08-24

5.  Mechanical force system of double key loop with finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jiali Liu; Duanqiang Zhang; Linyu Xu; Senxin Cai; Jinquan Guo; Jiang Chen; Jiehua Su
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Effects of force magnitude on torque control in the correction of bimaxillary protrusion with mass retraction.

Authors:  Jiao Li; Yunhe Zhao; Houxuan Li; Huang Li; Lang Lei
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-06-06

7.  Comparison of the accuracy of virtual and direct bonding of orthodontic accessories.

Authors:  Natalice Sousa de Oliveira; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Leniana Santos Neves; Elizabeth Maria Bastos Lages; Soraia Macari; Henrique Pretti
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-05

8.  A Novel Temporary Anchorage Device Aided Sectional Mechanics for Simultaneous Orthodontic Retraction and Intrusion.

Authors:  Adith Venugopal; Paolo Manzano; Sri Rengalakshmi
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2020-01-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.