A Driessen1, N Schäfer, V Albrecht, M Schenk, M Fröhlich, E K Stürmer, M Maegele. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Sports Traumatology, Cologne-Merheim Medical Centre (CMMC), Witten/Herdecke University (Campus Cologne-Merheim), Ostmerheimerstr 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany, driessena@kliniken-koeln.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Early detection and management of post-traumatic haemorrhage and coagulopathy have been associated with improved outcomes, but local infrastructures, logistics and clinical strategies may differ. METHODS: To assess local differences in infrastructure, logistics and clinical management of trauma-associated haemorrhage and coagulopathy, we have conducted a web-based survey amongst the delegates to the 15th European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ECTES) and the 2nd World Trauma (WT) Congress held in Frankfurt, Germany, 25-27 May 2014. RESULTS: 446/1,540 delegates completed the questionnaire yielding a response rate of 29%. The majority specified to work as consultants/senior physicians (47.3%) in general (36.1%) or trauma/orthopaedic surgery (44.5%) of level I (70%) or level II (19%) trauma centres. Clinical assessment (>80%) and standard coagulation assays (74.6%) are the most frequently used strategies for early detection and monitoring of bleeding trauma patients with coagulopathy. Only 30% of the respondents declared to use extended coagulation assays to better characterise the bleeding and coagulopathy prompted by more individualised treatment concepts. Most trauma centres (69%) have implemented local protocols based on international and national guidelines using conventional blood products, e.g. packed red blood cell concentrates (93.3%), fresh frozen plasma concentrates (93.3%) and platelet concentrates (83%), and antifibrinolytics (100%). 89% considered the continuous intake of anticoagulants including "new oral anticoagulants" and platelet inhibitors as an increasing threat to bleeding trauma patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms differences in infrastructure, logistics and clinical practice for the detection and management of trauma-haemorrhage and trauma-associated coagulopathy amongst international centres. Ongoing work will focus on geographical differences.
PURPOSE: Early detection and management of post-traumatic haemorrhage and coagulopathy have been associated with improved outcomes, but local infrastructures, logistics and clinical strategies may differ. METHODS: To assess local differences in infrastructure, logistics and clinical management of trauma-associated haemorrhage and coagulopathy, we have conducted a web-based survey amongst the delegates to the 15th European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ECTES) and the 2nd World Trauma (WT) Congress held in Frankfurt, Germany, 25-27 May 2014. RESULTS: 446/1,540 delegates completed the questionnaire yielding a response rate of 29%. The majority specified to work as consultants/senior physicians (47.3%) in general (36.1%) or trauma/orthopaedic surgery (44.5%) of level I (70%) or level II (19%) trauma centres. Clinical assessment (>80%) and standard coagulation assays (74.6%) are the most frequently used strategies for early detection and monitoring of bleeding traumapatients with coagulopathy. Only 30% of the respondents declared to use extended coagulation assays to better characterise the bleeding and coagulopathy prompted by more individualised treatment concepts. Most trauma centres (69%) have implemented local protocols based on international and national guidelines using conventional blood products, e.g. packed red blood cell concentrates (93.3%), fresh frozen plasma concentrates (93.3%) and platelet concentrates (83%), and antifibrinolytics (100%). 89% considered the continuous intake of anticoagulants including "new oral anticoagulants" and platelet inhibitors as an increasing threat to bleeding traumapatients. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms differences in infrastructure, logistics and clinical practice for the detection and management of trauma-haemorrhage and trauma-associated coagulopathy amongst international centres. Ongoing work will focus on geographical differences.
Authors: Carl J Hauser; Kenneth Boffard; Richard Dutton; Gordon R Bernard; Martin A Croce; John B Holcomb; Ari Leppaniemi; Michael Parr; Jean-Louis Vincent; Bartholomew J Tortella; Jeannett Dimsits; Bertil Bouillon Journal: J Trauma Date: 2010-09
Authors: John R Hess; Karim Brohi; Richard P Dutton; Carl J Hauser; John B Holcomb; Yoram Kluger; Kevin Mackway-Jones; Michael J Parr; Sandro B Rizoli; Tetsuo Yukioka; David B Hoyt; Bertil Bouillon Journal: J Trauma Date: 2008-10
Authors: Christopher W Snyder; Jordan A Weinberg; Gerald McGwin; Sherry M Melton; Richard L George; Donald A Reiff; James M Cross; Jennifer Hubbard-Brown; Loring W Rue; Jeffrey D Kerby Journal: J Trauma Date: 2009-02
Authors: Simon J Stanworth; Timothy P Morris; Christine Gaarder; J Carel Goslings; Marc Maegele; Mitchell J Cohen; Thomas C König; Ross A Davenport; Jean-Francois Pittet; Pär I Johansson; Shubha Allard; Tony Johnson; Karim Brohi Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: V Albrecht; N Schäfer; E K Stürmer; A Driessen; L Betsche; M Schenk; M Maegele Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Helen E Campbell; Elizabeth A Stokes; Danielle N Bargo; Nicola Curry; Fiona E Lecky; Antoinette Edwards; Maralyn Woodford; Frances Seeney; Simon Eaglestone; Karim Brohi; Alastair M Gray; Simon J Stanworth Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Johannes Gleich; Evi Fleischhacker; Katherine Rascher; Thomas Friess; Christian Kammerlander; Wolfgang Böcker; Benjamin Bücking; Ulrich Liener; Michael Drey; Christine Höfer; Carl Neuerburg Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 4.241