Literature DB >> 26037782

Tissue-Engineered Tracheal Replacement in a Child: A 4-Year Follow-Up Study.

N J Hamilton1, M Kanani2, D J Roebuck3, R J Hewitt4, R Cetto5, E J Culme-Seymour6, E Toll2, A J Bates5, A P Comerford5, C A McLaren3, C R Butler7, C Crowley8, D McIntyre2, N J Sebire9, S M Janes7, C O'Callaghan10, C Mason6, P De Coppi11, M W Lowdell12, M J Elliott2, M A Birchall1.   

Abstract

In 2010, a tissue-engineered trachea was transplanted into a 10-year-old child using a decellularized deceased donor trachea repopulated with the recipient's respiratory epithelium and mesenchymal stromal cells. We report the child's clinical progress, tracheal epithelialization and costs over the 4 years. A chronology of events was derived from clinical notes and costs determined using reference costs per procedure. Serial tracheoscopy images, lung function tests and anti-HLA blood samples were compared. Epithelial morphology and T cell, Ki67 and cleaved caspase 3 activity were examined. Computational fluid dynamic simulations determined flow, velocity and airway pressure drops. After the first year following transplantation, the number of interventions fell and the child is currently clinically well and continues in education. Endoscopy demonstrated a complete mucosal lining at 15 months, despite retention of a stent. Histocytology indicates a differentiated respiratory layer and no abnormal immune activity. Computational fluid dynamic analysis demonstrated increased velocity and pressure drops around a distal tracheal narrowing. Cross-sectional area analysis showed restriction of growth within an area of in-stent stenosis. This report demonstrates the long-term viability of a decellularized tissue-engineered trachea within a child. Further research is needed to develop bioengineered pediatric tracheal replacements with lower morbidity, better biomechanics and lower costs.
© 2015 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Graft survival; growth and development; tissue/organ engineering

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26037782      PMCID: PMC4737133          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


good manufacturing practice Great Ormond Street Hospital intensive care unit

Introduction

The application of tissue engineering to restore a segment of airway in those with long‐segment tracheal stenosis resistant to treatment is now realistic. Such therapies remain highly controversial, however, due to uncertainty regarding long‐term benefit, quality of life and comparative cost. A 5‐year follow‐up of the first tissue‐engineered airway in an adult reported normal lung function and a good quality of life long‐term albeit with the need for serial insertions of airway stents 1, 2. Approaches based on synthetic scaffolds have also been reported, though only with short‐term follow‐up to date 3. In 2012, we reported a 2‐year follow‐up of the first tissue‐engineered tracheal transplant in a child using a decellularized deceased donor trachea repopulated with the patient's own respiratory epithelial cells and mesenchymal stromal cells 4. While this demonstrated the validity of this approach in reconstructing an airway over a 2‐year period, a number of key questions remain unanswered. The trachea continues to grow up to adulthood and it is still not known whether a transplanted engineered airway has capacity for growth 5. The long‐term outcome is also unclear in terms of how the graft remodels over time, whether it continues to support regenerated epithelium and if it continues to be unchallenged by the immune system. An evaluation of the quality of life of the recipient, a chronology of events and estimation of cost is necessary to evaluate the potential for a wider application of this technology and its place within a healthcare system. We address these questions by reporting observations of this child's clinical progress and tracheal epithelialization 4 years after implantation.

Materials and Methods

Clinical data were collated from the patient notes documenting his long‐term care at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH). The Peds QL parent‐proxy assessment tool was used as a validated method of analyzing health‐related quality of life in children with chronic disease and associated learning disabilities 6. Neck and chest computed tomography scans at 3 months (June 2010), 42 months (September 2013) and 49 months (April 2014) following transplantation were compared. 3D reconstructions of the tracheal lumen were performed using Mimics® Innovation Suite (Materialise, Materialise Belgium – Technologielaan 15, Leuven, Belgium). Cross‐sectional area of the trachea was calculated following methods previously described 7. Tracheal airflow was calculated using a validated method through computational fluid dynamics 8, 9. Endoscopy images of the transplanted trachea were obtained during microlaryngobronchoscopy performed at 15 days, 6, 15 and 42 months following transplantation using a 15‐mm zero degree Hopkins Rod and image capture (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany). Biopsy samples were routinely processed following formalin fixation, followed by paraffin wax embedding and cutting of 4‐μm sections onto glass slides for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunostaining using an automated immunostainer (Leica Bond‐Max, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Samples of cilia were obtained during routine flexible bronchoscopy by brushing the trachea with a 2‐mm cytology brush (Olympus Endotherapy, Olympus, Skinjuku‐ku, Tokyo) 10. Samples were analyzed using a digital high‐speed video camera (MotionPro X4, IDT, CA) at a frame rate of 500 frames s–1 to allow assessment of ciliary beat frequency and pattern. The costing for the clinical items were obtained using a combination of NHS reference costs (2010–2011 period) per procedure appropriate for a male child and typical costs for complex tracheal patients provided by GOSH. The laboratory costs were estimated from data gathered from the good manufacturing practice (GMP) laboratories where further grafts were constructed to treat two later patients (data not shown).

Results

Chronology of events

Following transplantation at GOSH in March 2010, the child returned to the intensive care unit (ICU; unit providing level 2 and 3 care) where he remained an inpatient for 8 days, before being discharged from critical care 11. He required 25 procedures postoperatively, mainly to clear secretions and granulation tissue (Figure 1). The graft itself was malacic in the initial period necessitating the insertion of two bioabsorbable tracheal stents. On four occasions during the initial period admission to the ICU was needed for respiratory support.
Figure 1

Number of clinical events from transplantation to the fourth year of follow‐up. The frequency of interventions fell significantly following the first year after transplantation. B&B, bronchoscopy and bronchogram; CICU, cardiac intensive care unit; MLB, microlaryngoscopy and bronchoscopy.

Number of clinical events from transplantation to the fourth year of follow‐up. The frequency of interventions fell significantly following the first year after transplantation. B&B, bronchoscopy and bronchogram; CICU, cardiac intensive care unit; MLB, microlaryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. The child was discharged home in August 2010, but required a number of return visits to GOSH to address retained secretions, granulation and a malacic segment in the distal transplanted trachea, necessitating the insertion of further stents, one bioabsorbable and two self‐expanding nitinol. There were two further admissions to ICU during the first year follow up period and one ICU admission during the second year follow up period. By 6 months, the airway was sufficiently stable to allow the child to return to school and the need for repeated interventions declined up to late 2013 when an infection and stenosis within the tracheal stents and un‐transplanted left main bronchus necessitated intervention. Following balloon dilatation of the trachea and left main bronchus, the child made a good recovery and has now returned to full‐time education. A Peds QL 4 · 0 parent proxy quality of life assessment was completed in May 2014. Scores were 50, 60, 55 and 35 for physical, emotional, social and school subscales, respectively, with a total score of 50 out of 100. Since transplantation, the child has grown 15 cm in height to 168 cm and gained 21 kg in weight to 58 kg.

Assessment of the transplanted trachea

Figure 2 shows the cross‐sectional area comparison derived from the 2010, 2013 and 2014 CT scans. Comparison of the 2010 tracheal geometry to a normal trachea demonstrates the formation of high velocity region in its distal segment (Figure 3A) 12. In 2013, the velocity in this region increased further and formed a jet 40 mm below the glottis. By 2014, the jet formed more proximally (circa 17 mm subglottically). The effect of these changes in flow pattern is seen in Figure 3B. Lung Function Tests in October 2013 and April 2014 showed flattening of both inspiratory and expiratory parts of the inspiratory/expiratory flow volume curves consistent with a fixed obstruction of the trachea.
Figure 2

Cross‐sectional variation in area along the length of the trachea as derived from each scan. Both the more recent measurements demonstrate growth at either end of the transplanted section, whereas the 2010 measurements are more constant along the length. The minimum area has reduced by 20.5% between 2010 and 2014, while the area has more than doubled at the extremities. Below the area plot you can see a reconstruction of the 2013 geometry and stent with the centerline highlighted.

Figure 3

(A) Flow velocities. The velocity in the 2010 geometry is relatively uniform, similar to that of a healthy/normal individual in the upper region, while somewhat accelerated in the lower part. By 2013, a constriction is apparent which leads to the formation of a jet in that area. A longer constriction is seen in 2014 geometry which causes higher velocities in the upper region and a stronger jet below necessitating intervention with balloon dilatation. (B) Relative pressure. Here, we see relative pressure plotted along the distance of the centerline. 2013 shows an abrupt drop in pressure at the location of the jet, which then plateaus, to a pressure drop slightly higher than that in 2010. The long constriction and strong jet in 2014 results in double the pressure drop when compared to the 2010 geometry.

Cross‐sectional variation in area along the length of the trachea as derived from each scan. Both the more recent measurements demonstrate growth at either end of the transplanted section, whereas the 2010 measurements are more constant along the length. The minimum area has reduced by 20.5% between 2010 and 2014, while the area has more than doubled at the extremities. Below the area plot you can see a reconstruction of the 2013 geometry and stent with the centerline highlighted. (A) Flow velocities. The velocity in the 2010 geometry is relatively uniform, similar to that of a healthy/normal individual in the upper region, while somewhat accelerated in the lower part. By 2013, a constriction is apparent which leads to the formation of a jet in that area. A longer constriction is seen in 2014 geometry which causes higher velocities in the upper region and a stronger jet below necessitating intervention with balloon dilatation. (B) Relative pressure. Here, we see relative pressure plotted along the distance of the centerline. 2013 shows an abrupt drop in pressure at the location of the jet, which then plateaus, to a pressure drop slightly higher than that in 2010. The long constriction and strong jet in 2014 results in double the pressure drop when compared to the 2010 geometry. Microlaryngoscopy 15 days after transplantation showed a dense web covering the stent and partially occluding the lumen (Figure 4A). At 42 months, a complete mucosal layer is demonstrated throughout the trachea (Figure 4B) with the stents embedded beneath (Figure 5).
Figure 4

Bronchoscopy appearances. (A) Microlaryngoscopy 15 days after transplantation demonstrates a dense web and inflammation within the transplanted segment partially occluding the airway. (B) At 42 months after surgery a complete mucosal layer can be seen within the transplanted segment and a widely patent airway is seen.

Figure 5

Computer tomography images: axial, coronal, and sagittal sections taken in 2010 and 2013. The stents can be seen embedded within the tracheal wall in the 2013 scans (*). The narrowed transplanted segment is visible in both the 2010 and 2013 images. The left sided superior vena cava is not unusual in patients with long segment congenital tracheal stenosis.

Bronchoscopy appearances. (A) Microlaryngoscopy 15 days after transplantation demonstrates a dense web and inflammation within the transplanted segment partially occluding the airway. (B) At 42 months after surgery a complete mucosal layer can be seen within the transplanted segment and a widely patent airway is seen. Computer tomography images: axial, coronal, and sagittal sections taken in 2010 and 2013. The stents can be seen embedded within the tracheal wall in the 2013 scans (*). The narrowed transplanted segment is visible in both the 2010 and 2013 images. The left sided superior vena cava is not unusual in patients with long segment congenital tracheal stenosis. A section of the excised homograft trachea exhibited normal ciliated respiratory type epithelium (Figure 6A). A biopsy of the transplanted trachea 1‐month following the procedure showed granulation tissue only (Figure 6B). At 42 months, a biopsy of the proximal transplant showed a complete epithelial layer with a mix of squamoid and respiratory type epithelium with scanty ciliated cells (Figure 6C). An immunostained section using CD3 demonstrated no evidence of rejection or lymphocyte‐associated epithelial damage and normal submucosal T cell density (Figure 6D). Staining for Ki67 was normal and cleaved caspase 3 was negative in both pre and posttransplant specimens. Serial serological examination to date has shown no evidence of anti‐donor HLA antibodies.
Figure 6

Photomicrographs demonstrating (A) resected homograft trachea March 2010, (B) biopsy of tissue engineered tracheal lining 1 month after transplantation showing extensive granulation tissue, (C) biopsy of proximal tissue‐engineered trachea at 42 months showing complete re‐epithelialization and with scanty ciliated cells, (D) CD3 immunostain for T‐lymphocytes on tracheal biopsy (42 months) demonstrating normal submucosal T cell density.

Photomicrographs demonstrating (A) resected homograft trachea March 2010, (B) biopsy of tissue engineered tracheal lining 1 month after transplantation showing extensive granulation tissue, (C) biopsy of proximal tissue‐engineered trachea at 42 months showing complete re‐epithelialization and with scanty ciliated cells, (D) CD3 immunostain for T‐lymphocytes on tracheal biopsy (42 months) demonstrating normal submucosal T cell density. Brushings on routine endoscopy in April 2014 demonstrated ciliated epithelial cells. Ciliary beat frequency was within the normal range at 10.7 Hz (95% confidence intervals 10 · 4–11 · 0) with a normal ciliary beat pattern. On electron microscopy, structurally normal ciliary axonemes were observed.

Cost of treatment

The total clinical cost of the transplant and follow‐up care to March 2014 was calculated to be US$565 414 (£/$ exchange rate 1:1.56) (Table 1). The costs for treatment from the date of transplant up to first discharge from GOSH contributed to 76% of the total clinical cost, at US$427 255. Following discharge, the clinical costs were less at US$94 749, US$20 693, under US$1560 and US$21 835 for the first, second, third and fourth years, respectively (Figure 7). The laboratory costs of preparing the tissue‐engineered trachea were estimated to be US$15 600.
Table 1

Interventions and corresponding costings for first period, i.e., first admission to first official discharge

Cost ($ approximately)
Ward and ICU stays$157 265
Imaging$333
Broncoscopies$1939
Surgery costs 1 $268 881
Total$428 418

ICU, intensive care unit; MLB, microlaryngoscopy and bronchoscopy.

Including MLBs, stent insertion and removal, bone marrow aspiration for cell harvest, and the procedures involved in the graft transplant itself.

Figure 7

Chart showing the cost of clinical treatment within the initial postoperative period to the fourth year of follow‐up. Clinical costs fell significantly after the initial admission and further still after the first year. Costs slightly increased in the fourth year due to an illness requiring dilatation of an old left bronchial stent.

Interventions and corresponding costings for first period, i.e., first admission to first official discharge ICU, intensive care unit; MLB, microlaryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. Including MLBs, stent insertion and removal, bone marrow aspiration for cell harvest, and the procedures involved in the graft transplant itself. Chart showing the cost of clinical treatment within the initial postoperative period to the fourth year of follow‐up. Clinical costs fell significantly after the initial admission and further still after the first year. Costs slightly increased in the fourth year due to an illness requiring dilatation of an old left bronchial stent.

Discussion

The use of a tissue‐engineered tracheal transplant is currently a potential treatment of last resort. In the reported case, all conventional therapies had failed and the technique was used on compassionate grounds in an urgent setting. This intervention has not only preserved life for more than 4 years, but has enabled the child to mature, continue education and be free of medical intervention for long periods. Indeed, the timing and frequency of interventions between the 1st and 4th years following transplantation compare favorably to children suffering from recurrent tracheal stenosis or those with metallic tracheal stents treated in our institution. The Peds QL score is consistent with a child suffering from a complex chronic disease 13. A low physical subscale mainly accounted for this and his co‐existing conditions, including spastic diplegia, make it difficult to determine the contribution of his airway disease alone to this score. The emergent nature of our case necessitated the use of intraoperative native airway epithelial patches to re‐epithelialize the graft 4. The absence of a safe and effective method of monitoring epithelial fate in vivo in humans prohibits observations of the fate of such epithelium. A number of preclinical studies have indicated re‐epithelialization occurs from migration of cells from the wound edge following tracheal transplantation 14, 15, tracheal replacement with aortic grafts 16, 17 or synthetic material 18. While this might question the need for re‐epithelizing grafts prior to transplantation, evidence exists supporting the role of epithelium in reducing postoperative stenosis and it is probable that transplanted epithelia act as a biological dressing as re‐epithelization occurs from the wound edge 19. Alternative protocols for epithelizing tracheal grafts use cadaveric tracheal cartilage prevascularized within radial forearm fascia and lined with autologous buccal mucosa 20, 21. While this approach has reported some success, it is limited by the need for prolonged periods of immunosuppression and the delivery of squamous rather than ciliated epithelium within the airway. The emergent circumstances of our case meant this approach was unsuitable as there was insufficient time for prevascularisation. It is hoped with advances in cell expansion techniques and biomaterials that it will be possible to deliver a fully differentiated autologous respiratory epithelial sheet as has been reported with buccal and corneal epithelium 22, 23. This, in combination with a prevascularised decellularized tracheal scaffold, would allow for the delivery of a vascularized epithelized tracheal graft without immunosuppression. A cross‐sectional centerline analysis suggested growth at the proximal and distal portions of the trachea over time. Cross‐sectional area is restricted at 15–45 mm below the first tracheal ring in all scans corresponding to an area of in‐stent stenosis. It is not possible to determine whether the transplanted trachea would have grown had in‐stent stenosis been avoided. Whether the transplanted section includes viable tracheal cartilage can also not be determined with routine investigations. However, a complete mucosal layer, dynamic movement of the airway and demonstrable tracheal rings on endoscopy indicate the transplanted trachea is functioning as a cartilaginous frame. Of note, recurrent stenosis has been reported in the other example of a decellularized airway transplant 1. We also report, for the first time to our knowledge, the use of computational fluid dynamic simulations within a reconstructed trachea. This validated technique provides detailed information on how distinct geometrical features correlate with airflow distribution and provides information on pressure 7, 8, 12. Our results demonstrate an increasing pressure drop at the distal segment of the transplanted trachea due to the jet shown in Figure 3 and highlighted the area most in need of intervention with a corresponding improvement in symptomatology following targeted treatment. We hypothesize that similar results can be derived from high‐field‐strength magnetic resonance imaging using these techniques to provide accurate, personalized and noninvasive planning, and follow‐up following large airway surgery, including transplantation. The total cost of this tissue‐engineered tracheal transplant is greater than conventional forms of airway management; however, our approach is only indicated for a small subset of children with airway stenosis and the calculated costs herein are unlikely to be prohibitive within a modern healthcare system. Our observations and interpretations of the problems the child faced in this early period have fed back into substantially improved tissue‐engineering protocols, and an advanced GMP process which will lead to substantial, iterative, reductions in hospital stay, complications and, thus, costs. To our knowledge, this is the first long‐term follow‐up report of a child receiving a tissue‐engineered trachea. Further research is required to develop bioengineered pediatric tracheal replacements with lower morbidity, better biomechanics and at a cost acceptable to healthcare providers. Future clinical trials of such constructs should include comprehensive assessments of airway physiology, biology, quality of life, and health economics.

Disclosure

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. Supplementary Materials and Methods Click here for additional data file.
  22 in total

Review 1.  Tracheal transplantation.

Authors:  Pierre R Delaere
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.155

2.  Tracheal regeneration following tracheal replacement with an allogenic aorta.

Authors:  Emmanuel Martinod; Agathe Seguin; Muriel Holder-Espinasse; Marianne Kambouchner; Martine Duterque-Coquillaud; Jacques F Azorin; Alain F Carpentier
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Both epithelial cells and mesenchymal stem cell-derived chondrocytes contribute to the survival of tissue-engineered airway transplants in pigs.

Authors:  Tetsuhiko Go; Philipp Jungebluth; Silvia Baiguero; Adelaide Asnaghi; Jaume Martorell; Helmut Ostertag; Sara Mantero; Martin Birchall; Augustinus Bader; Paolo Macchiarini
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Tissue-engineered oral mucosa.

Authors:  K Moharamzadeh; H Colley; C Murdoch; V Hearnden; W L Chai; I M Brook; M H Thornhill; S Macneil
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations.

Authors:  J W Varni; M Seid; P S Kurtin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Validation of computational fluid dynamics in CT-based airway models with SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Jan W De Backer; Wim G Vos; Samir C Vinchurkar; Rita Claes; Anton Drollmann; Denis Wulfrank; Paul M Parizel; Paul Germonpré; Wilfried De Backer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Dimensions of the growing trachea related to age and gender.

Authors:  N T Griscom; M E Wohl
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  The first tissue-engineered airway transplantation: 5-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Alessandro Gonfiotti; Massimo O Jaus; Daniel Barale; Silvia Baiguera; Camilla Comin; Federico Lavorini; Giovanni Fontana; Oriol Sibila; Giovanni Rombolà; Philipp Jungebluth; Paolo Macchiarini
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Stem-cell-based, tissue engineered tracheal replacement in a child: a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Martin J Elliott; Paolo De Coppi; Simone Speggiorin; Derek Roebuck; Colin R Butler; Edward Samuel; Claire Crowley; Clare McLaren; Anja Fierens; David Vondrys; Lesley Cochrane; Christopher Jephson; Samuel Janes; Nicholas J Beaumont; Tristan Cogan; Augustinus Bader; Alexander M Seifalian; J Justin Hsuan; Mark W Lowdell; Martin A Birchall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Clinical transplantation of a tissue-engineered airway.

Authors:  Paolo Macchiarini; Philipp Jungebluth; Tetsuhiko Go; M Adelaide Asnaghi; Louisa E Rees; Tristan A Cogan; Amanda Dodson; Jaume Martorell; Silvia Bellini; Pier Paolo Parnigotto; Sally C Dickinson; Anthony P Hollander; Sara Mantero; Maria Teresa Conconi; Martin A Birchall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  Current Solutions for Long-Segment Tracheal Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ahmed A Abouarab; Hany H Elsayed; Hussein Elkhayat; Ahmed Mostafa; David C Cleveland; Ahmed El Nori
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 2.  Aortic allografts: final destination?-a summary of clinical tracheal substitutes.

Authors:  Sailay Siddiqi; Rayna de Wit; Stefan van der Heide; Egbert Oosterwijk; Ad Verhagen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Endoscopic management of tissue-engineered tracheal graft stenosis in an ovine model.

Authors:  Victoria K Pepper; Ekene A Onwuka; Cameron A Best; Nakesha King; Eric Heuer; Jed Johnson; Christopher K Breuer; Jonathan M Grischkan; Tendy Chiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Clinical Translation of Tissue Engineered Trachea Grafts.

Authors:  Tendy Chiang; Victoria Pepper; Cameron Best; Ekene Onwuka; Christopher K Breuer
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Factors Influencing Poor Outcomes in Synthetic Tissue-Engineered Tracheal Replacement.

Authors:  Victoria Pepper; Cameron A Best; Kaila Buckley; Cynthia Schwartz; Ekene Onwuka; Nakesha King; Audrey White; Sayali Dharmadhikari; Susan D Reynolds; Jed Johnson; Jonathan Grischkan; Christopher K Breuer; Tendy Chiang
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 6.  Treatment of large tracheal defects after resection: Laryngotracheal release and tracheal replacement.

Authors:  Andreas Kirschbaum; Afshin Teymoortash; Carlos Suárez; Jatin P Shah; Carl E Silver; Iain Nixon; Alessandra Rinaldo; Luiz P Kowalski; K Thomas Robbins; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 1.863

Review 7.  Reconstruction of defects of the trachea.

Authors:  Margot Den Hondt; Jan Jeroen Vranckx
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Designing a tissue-engineered tracheal scaffold for preclinical evaluation.

Authors:  Cameron A Best; Victoria K Pepper; Devan Ohst; Kyle Bodnyk; Eric Heuer; Ekene A Onwuka; Nakesha King; Robert Strouse; Jonathan Grischkan; Christopher K Breuer; Jed Johnson; Tendy Chiang
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Feasibility of Bioengineered Tracheal and Bronchial Reconstruction Using Stented Aortic Matrices.

Authors:  Emmanuel Martinod; Kader Chouahnia; Dana M Radu; Pascal Joudiou; Yurdagul Uzunhan; Morad Bensidhoum; Ana M Santos Portela; Patrice Guiraudet; Marine Peretti; Marie-Dominique Destable; Audrey Solis; Sabiha Benachi; Anne Fialaire-Legendre; Hélène Rouard; Thierry Collon; Jacques Piquet; Sylvie Leroy; Nicolas Vénissac; Joseph Santini; Christophe Tresallet; Hervé Dutau; Georges Sebbane; Yves Cohen; Sadek Beloucif; Alexandre C d'Audiffret; Hervé Petite; Dominique Valeyre; Alain Carpentier; Eric Vicaut
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Engineered Axonal Tracts as "Living Electrodes" for Synaptic-Based Modulation of Neural Circuitry.

Authors:  Mijail D Serruya; James P Harris; Dayo O Adewole; Laura A Struzyna; Justin C Burrell; Ashley Nemes; Dmitriy Petrov; Reuben H Kraft; H Isaac Chen; John A Wolf; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 18.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.