Literature DB >> 26037389

Paradigm shift in plant growth control.

Christian Körner1.   

Abstract

For plants to grow they need resources and appropriate conditions that these resources are converted into biomass. While acknowledging the importance of co-drivers, the classical view is still that carbon, that is, photosynthetic CO2 uptake, ranks above any other drivers of plant growth. Hence, theory and modelling of growth traditionally is carbon centric. Here, I suggest that this view is not reflecting reality, but emerged from the availability of methods and process understanding at leaf level. In most cases, poorly understood processes of tissue formation and cell growth are governing carbon demand, and thus, CO2 uptake. Carbon can only be converted into biomass to the extent chemical elements other than carbon, temperature or cell turgor permit.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26037389     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol        ISSN: 1369-5266            Impact factor:   7.834


  65 in total

1.  Carbon allocation to growth and storage depends on elevation provenance in an herbaceous alpine plant of Mediterranean climate.

Authors:  Claudia Reyes-Bahamonde; Frida I Piper; Lohengrin A Cavieres
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  How does climate influence xylem morphogenesis over the growing season? Insights from long-term intra-ring anatomy in Picea abies.

Authors:  Daniele Castagneri; Patrick Fonti; Georg von Arx; Marco Carrer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  ENSO Drives interannual variation of forest woody growth across the tropics.

Authors:  Sami W Rifai; Cécile A J Girardin; Erika Berenguer; Jhon Del Aguila-Pasquel; Cecilia A L Dahlsjö; Christopher E Doughty; Kathryn J Jeffery; Sam Moore; Imma Oliveras; Terhi Riutta; Lucy M Rowland; Alejandro Araujo Murakami; Shalom D Addo-Danso; Paulo Brando; Chad Burton; Fidèle Evouna Ondo; Akwasi Duah-Gyamfi; Filio Farfán Amézquita; Renata Freitag; Fernando Hancco Pacha; Walter Huaraca Huasco; Forzia Ibrahim; Armel T Mbou; Vianet Mihindou Mihindou; Karine S Peixoto; Wanderley Rocha; Liana C Rossi; Marina Seixas; Javier E Silva-Espejo; Katharine A Abernethy; Stephen Adu-Bredu; Jos Barlow; Antonio C L da Costa; Beatriz S Marimon; Ben H Marimon-Junior; Patrick Meir; Daniel B Metcalfe; Oliver L Phillips; Lee J T White; Yadvinder Malhi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Engineering Strategies to Boost Crop Productivity by Cutting Respiratory Carbon Loss.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Amthor; Arren Bar-Even; Andrew D Hanson; A Harvey Millar; Mark Stitt; Lee J Sweetlove; Stephen D Tyerman
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Phenotypic integration and life history strategies among populations of Pinus halepensis: an insight through structural equation modelling.

Authors:  Filippo Santini; José M Climent; Jordi Voltas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Rhizosphere activity in an old-growth forest reacts rapidly to changes in soil moisture and shapes whole-tree carbon allocation.

Authors:  Jobin Joseph; Decai Gao; Bernhard Backes; Corinne Bloch; Ivano Brunner; Gerd Gleixner; Matthias Haeni; Henrik Hartmann; Günter Hoch; Christian Hug; Ansgar Kahmen; Marco M Lehmann; Mai-He Li; Jörg Luster; Martina Peter; Christian Poll; Andreas Rigling; Kaisa A Rissanen; Nadine K Ruehr; Matthias Saurer; Marcus Schaub; Leonie Schönbeck; Benjamin Stern; Frank M Thomas; Roland A Werner; Willy Werner; Thomas Wohlgemuth; Frank Hagedorn; Arthur Gessler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A generic individual-based model to simulate morphogenesis, C-N acquisition and population dynamics in contrasting forage legumes.

Authors:  Gaëtan Louarn; Lucas Faverjon
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Partitioning direct and indirect effects reveals the response of water-limited ecosystems to elevated CO2.

Authors:  Simone Fatichi; Sebastian Leuzinger; Athanasios Paschalis; J Adam Langley; Alicia Donnellan Barraclough; Mark J Hovenden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Synchronization of developmental, molecular and metabolic aspects of source-sink interactions.

Authors:  Alisdair R Fernie; Christian W B Bachem; Yrjö Helariutta; H Ekkehard Neuhaus; Salomé Prat; Yong-Ling Ruan; Mark Stitt; Lee J Sweetlove; Mechthild Tegeder; Vanessa Wahl; Sophia Sonnewald; Uwe Sonnewald
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 15.793

10.  Biomass and nitrogen distribution ratios reveal a reduced root investment in temperate lianas vs. self-supporting plants.

Authors:  Tomasz P Wyka; Marcin Zadworny; Joanna Mucha; Roma Żytkowiak; Kinga Nowak; Jacek Oleksyn
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.