Literature DB >> 26037323

Accuracy assessment of 3D bone reconstructions using CT: an intro comparison.

Emily A Lalone1, Ryan T Willing1, Hannah L Shannon1, Graham J W King2, James A Johnson3.   

Abstract

Computed tomography provides high contrast imaging of the joint anatomy and is used routinely to reconstruct 3D models of the osseous and cartilage geometry (CT arthrography) for use in the design of orthopedic implants, for computer assisted surgeries and computational dynamic and structural analysis. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of bone and cartilage surface model reconstructions by comparing reconstructed geometries with bone digitizations obtained using an optical tracking system. Bone surface digitizations obtained in this study determined the ground truth measure for the underlying geometry. We evaluated the use of a commercially available reconstruction technique using clinical CT scanning protocols using the elbow joint as an example of a surface with complex geometry. To assess the accuracies of the reconstructed models (8 fresh frozen cadaveric specimens) against the ground truth bony digitization-as defined by this study-proximity mapping was used to calculate residual error. The overall mean error was less than 0.4 mm in the cortical region and 0.3 mm in the subchondral region of the bone. Similarly creating 3D cartilage surface models from CT scans using air contrast had a mean error of less than 0.3 mm. Results from this study indicate that clinical CT scanning protocols and commonly used and commercially available reconstruction algorithms can create models which accurately represent the true geometry.
Copyright © 2015 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D bone reconstruction; 3D cartilage reconstruction; Accuracy assessment; Computed tomography; Elbow; Optical tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26037323     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  10 in total

1.  Quantifying the competing relationship between adduction range of motion and baseplate micromotion with lateralization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Josie Elwell; Joseph Choi; Ryan Willing
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Comparison of cartilage and bone morphological models of the ankle joint derived from different medical imaging technologies.

Authors:  Gilda Durastanti; Alberto Leardini; Sorin Siegler; Stefano Durante; Alberto Bazzocchi; Claudio Belvedere
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-08

3.  TI VIBE inversion MRI - An alternative to CT for imaging of hip pain.

Authors:  A Subramanian; G Hegde; C Azzopardi; A M Davies; A Patel; S L James; R Botchu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-27

4.  In Vivo Evaluation of 3D-Printed Polycaprolactone Scaffold Implantation Combined with β-TCP Powder for Alveolar Bone Augmentation in a Beagle Defect Model.

Authors:  Su A Park; Hyo-Jung Lee; Keun-Suh Kim; Sang Jin Lee; Jung-Tae Lee; Sung-Yeol Kim; Na-Hee Chang; Shin-Young Park
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Interlaboratory comparison of femur surface reconstruction from CT data compared to reference optical 3D scan.

Authors:  Ehsan Soodmand; Daniel Kluess; Patrick A Varady; Robert Cichon; Michael Schwarze; Dominic Gehweiler; Frank Niemeyer; Dieter Pahr; Matthias Woiczinski
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Regional Distribution of Articular Cartilage Thickness in the Elbow Joint: A 3-Dimensional Study in Elderly Humans.

Authors:  Satoshi Miyamura; Takashi Sakai; Kunihiro Oka; Shingo Abe; Atsuo Shigi; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Shoichi Shimada; Tatsuo Mae; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Hideki Yoshikawa; Tsuyoshi Murase
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2019-07-31

7.  Validity of computed tomographic measurements and morphological comparison of cubital tunnel in idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Sang Ki Lee; Seok Young Hwang; Won Sik Choy
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Visualization and quantification of the degenerative pattern of the distal tibia and fibula in unilateral varus ankle osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Seki; Naomichi Ogihara; Tetsuro Kokubo; Takeo Nagura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparability of skeletal fibulae surfaces generated by different source scanning (dual-energy CT scan vs. high resolution laser scanning) and 3D geometric morphometric validation.

Authors:  Annalisa Pietrobelli; Rita Sorrentino; Veronica Notariale; Stefano Durante; Stefano Benazzi; Damiano Marchi; Maria Giovanna Belcastro
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.921

10.  Three-dimensionally printed polycaprolactone/beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold was more effective as an rhBMP-2 carrier for new bone formation than polycaprolactone alone.

Authors:  Su A Park; Hyo-Jung Lee; Sung-Yeol Kim; Keun-Suh Kim; Deuk-Won Jo; Shin-Young Park
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2020-08-22       Impact factor: 4.396

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.