Literature DB >> 26035873

Care Preferences Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Chronic Disease in Europe: Individual Health Care Needs and National Health Care Infrastructure.

Christine A Mair1, Ana R Quiñones2, Maha A Pasha2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study is to expand knowledge of care options for aging populations cross-nationally by examining key individual-level and nation-level predictors of European middle-aged and older adults' preferences for care. DESIGN AND METHODS: Drawing on data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, we analyze old age care preferences of a sample of 6,469 adults aged 50 and older with chronic disease in 14 nations. Using multilevel modeling, we analyze associations between individual-level health care needs and nation-level health care infrastructure and preference for family-based (vs. state-based) personal care.
RESULTS: We find that middle-aged and older adults with chronic disease whose health limits their ability to perform paid work, who did not receive personal care from informal sources, and who live in nations with generous long-term care funding are less likely to prefer family-based care and more likely to prefer state-based care. IMPLICATIONS: We discuss these findings in light of financial risks in later life and the future role of specialized health support programs, such as long-term care.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caregiving; Health care policy; formal; informal

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26035873      PMCID: PMC5885988          DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnu119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  21 in total

1.  Do personality traits moderate the impact of care receipt on end-of-life care planning?

Authors:  Jung-Hwa Ha; Manacy Pai
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2012-03-28

2.  Similar pressures, different contexts: public attitudes toward government intervention for health care in 21 nations.

Authors:  Saeko Kikuzawa; Sigrun Olafsdottir; Bernice A Pescosolido
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2008-12

3.  Aging in the Netherlands: state of the art and science.

Authors:  Carolien H M Smits; Hugo K van den Beld; Marja J Aartsen; Johannes J F Schroots
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2013-09-02

Review 4.  Aging in Sweden: local variation, local control.

Authors:  Adam Davey; Bo Malmberg; Gerdt Sundström
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2013-10-14

5.  Stability of preferences for treatment among nursing home residents.

Authors:  J T Berger; D Majerovitz
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1998-04

6.  Revisiting convergence and divergence: support for older people in Europe.

Authors:  Karen Glaser; Cecilia Tomassini; Emily Grundy
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2004-11-10

7.  Long-term care preferences among older adults: a moving target?

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Judith D Kasper; Andrew D Shore
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  2008

8.  Preferences for receipt of care among community-dwelling adults.

Authors:  J Kevin Eckert; Leslie A Morgan; Namratha Swamy
Journal:  J Aging Soc Policy       Date:  2004

Review 9.  Patient characteristics as predictors of primary health care preferences: a systematic literature analysis.

Authors:  Hans Peter Jung; Cor Baerveldt; Frede Olesen; Richard Grol; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  How Can Adult Children Influence Parents' Long-Term Care Insurance Purchase Decisions?

Authors:  Nina R Sperber; Corrine I Voils; Norma B Coe; R Tamara Konetzka; Jillian Boles; Courtney Harold Van Houtven
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-04-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Caring for Frail Older People Living Alone in Italy: Future Housing Solutions and Responsibilities of Family and Public Services, a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Maria Gabriella Melchiorre; Barbara D'Amen; Sabrina Quattrini; Giovanni Lamura; Marco Socci
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Older Adults' Goals and Expectations When Using Long-Term Services and Supports.

Authors:  Jasmine L Travers; Karen B Hirschman; Mary D Naylor
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2021-07-27

3.  Family Caregiving and Place of Death: Insights From Cross-national Analysis of the Harmonized End-of-Life Data.

Authors:  Jennifer Ailshire; Margarita Osuna; Jenny Wilkens; Jinkook Lee
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Improvement in the long-term care burden after surgical treatment of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a supplementary study.

Authors:  Masatsune Ishikawa; Shigeki Yamada; Masakazu Miyajima; Hiroaki Kazui; Etsuro Mori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Who is responsible for providing care? Investigating the role of care tasks and past experiences in a cross-sectional survey in the Netherlands.

Authors:  R J Hoefman; T M Meulenkamp; J D De Jong
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Where would Canadians prefer to die? Variation by situational severity, support for family obligations, and age in a national study.

Authors:  Laura M Funk; Corey S Mackenzie; Maria Cherba; Nicole Del Rosario; Marian Krawczyk; Andrea Rounce; Kelli Stajduhar; S Robin Cohen
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.113

7.  Socioeconomic differences in informal caregiving in Europe.

Authors:  Nekehia T Quashie; Melanie Wagner; Ellen Verbakel; Christian Deindl
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2021-12-14

8.  Escape from the Darkness: The Need to Provide Elder-friendly Care Policies in Iran.

Authors:  Morteza Arab-Zozani; Mahtab Alizadeh Khoei; Ali Janati
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.429

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.