| Literature DB >> 26035022 |
Ting-Hsi Hsiao1,2, Chun-Sung Sung3,4, Yu-Hsuan Lan5, Yi-Chen Wang6,7, Mei-Chin Lu8,9, Zhi-Hong Wen10, Yang-Chang Wu11,12,13,14, Ping-Jyun Sung15,16,17,18,19.
Abstract
Two new cembranes, columnariols A (1) and B (2), were isolated from the cultured soft coral Nephthea columnaris. The structures of cembranes 1 and 2 were elucidated by spectroscopic methods. In the anti-inflammatory effects test, cembranes 1 and 2 were found to significantly inhibit the accumulation of the pro-inflammatory iNOS and COX-2 protein of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophage cells. Compound 1 exhibited moderate cytotoxicity toward LNCaP cells with an IC50 value of 9.80 μg/mL.Entities:
Keywords: COX-2; Nephthea columnaris; antiinflammatory; cembrane; cytotoxicity; iNOS; octocoral
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26035022 PMCID: PMC4483638 DOI: 10.3390/md13063443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Scheme 1The soft coral Nephthea columnaris and the structures of columnariols A (1) and B (2).
1H (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C (100 MHz, CDCl3) NMR data, 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations for cembrane 1.
| Position | δH ( | δC, Multiple | 1H–1H COSY | HMBC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.79 m | 49.9, CH | H-2, H2-14 | C-2, -3 |
| 2 | 4.65 dd (10.8, 4.4) | 70.1, CH | H-1, H-3 | C-1, -3, -4, -12, -14 |
| 3 | 5.48 d (10.8) | 126.4, CH | H-2, H3-18 | C-2, -5, -18 |
| 4 | 139.1, C | |||
| 5 | 2.20 ddd (12.4, 3.6, 3.6);1.98 m | 40.0, CH2 | H2-6 | C-3, -4, -6, -7, -18 |
| 6 | 2.31 ddd (14.0, 9.6, 3.6); 2.15 m | 25.1, CH2 | H2-5, H-7 | C-4, -7, -8 |
| 7 | 5.02 dd (10.8, 4.4) | 123.8, CH | H2-6, H3-19 | C-9, -19 |
| 8 | 136.2, C | |||
| 9 | 2.16 m; 1.99 m | 35.3, CH2 | H2-10 | C-7, -8, -10, -11, -19 |
| 10 | 1.82 m; 1.29 m | 31.6, CH2 | H2-9, H-11 | C-8, -9, -11, -12 |
| 11 | 3.84 d (9.2) | 72.4, CH | H2-10 | C-9, -12, -20 |
| 12 | 75.3, C | |||
| 13 | 2.46 ddd (14.0, 3.6, 3.6); 1.39 m | 33.7, CH2 | H2-14 | C-1, -11, -12, -14, -20 |
| 14 | 1.75 m; 1.66 m | 16.0, CH2 | H-1, H2-13 | C-1, -2, -12, -13 |
| 15 | 71.5, C | |||
| 16 | 1.17 s | 28.3, CH3 | C-1, -15, -17 | |
| 17 | 1.12 s | 27.8, CH3 | C-1, -15, -16 | |
| 18 | 1.69 s | 15.3, CH3 | H-3 | C-3, -4, -5 |
| 19 | 1.60 s | 17.3, CH3 | H-7 | C-7, -8, -9 |
| 20 | 1.04 s | 24.0, CH3 | C-11, -12, -13 |
Figure 1Key NOESY correlations of compound 1.
1H (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C (100 MHz, CDCl3) NMR data, 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations for cembrane 2.
| Position | δH ( | δC, Multiple | 1H–1H COSY | HMBC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.54 m | 51.9, CH | H-2, H2-14 | |
| 2 | 4.43 dd (10.0, 9.2) | 71.7, CH | H-1, H-3 | C-4 |
| 3 | 5.21 d (9.2) | 128.3, CH | H-2, H3-18 | C-5, -18 |
| 4 | 140.0, C | |||
| 5 | 2.26 m; 2.07 m | 40.0, CH2 | H2-6 | C-3, -4, -7 |
| 6 | 2.26 m; 2.17 m | 24.5, CH2 | H2-5, H-7 | C-4, -5, -7, -8 |
| 7 | 5.02 dd (6.8, 6.8) | 124.5, CH | H2-6, H3-19 | C-9, -19 |
| 8 | 134.6, C | |||
| 9 | 2.18 m; 2.03 m | 33.9, CH2 | H2-10 | C-7, -8, -11, -19 |
| 10 | 1.75 m; 1.53 m | 32.4, CH2 | H2-9 | C-11 |
| 11 | 4.08 dd (7.2, 4.0) | 70.8, CH | H2-10, H-20a | C-12 |
| 12 | 152.0, C | |||
| 13 | 2.17–2.03 m | 34.9, CH2 | H2-14, H2-20 | C-1, -11, -12, -14, -20 |
| 14 | 1.18 m; 1.07 m | 27.4, CH2 | H-1, H2-13 | C-1, -2, -12, -13, -15 |
| 15 | 75.0, C | |||
| 16 | 1.29 s | 30.3, CH3 | C-1, -15, -17 | |
| 17 | 1.31 s | 24.2, CH3 | C-1, -15, -16 | |
| 18 | 1.73 s | 15.7, CH3 | H-3 | C-3, -4, -5 |
| 19 | 1.58 s | 16.2, CH3 | H-7 | C-7, -8, -9 |
| 20a/b | 5.11 s; 4.85 s | 109.6, CH2 | H-11, H2-13 | C-11, -12, -13 |
Figure 2NOESY correlations of compound 2.
Figure 3Effects of compounds 1 and 2 on pro-inflammatory inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) protein expression in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated murine macrophage cell line, RAW264.7. (A) Relative density of iNOS immunoblot; (B) relative density of COX-2 immunoblot. The relative intensity of the LPS-stimulated group was taken to be 100%. Band intensities were quantified by densitometry and are indicated as the percent change relative to that of the LPS-stimulated group. Compounds 1, 2 and dexamethasone (Dex) significantly inhibited LPS-induced iNOS protein expression in macrophages. The experiment was repeated three times (* p < 0.05, significantly different from the LPS-stimulated group).
Cytotoxic Data of Cembranes 1 and 2.
| Compounds | Cell Lines IC50 (μg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOLT-4 | SUP-T1 | DLD-1 | LNCap | MCF7 | |
| NA | NA | NA | 9.80 | NA | |
| NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| Doxorubicin a | 0.001 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 2.68 | 1.39 |
a Doxorubicin was used as a positive control and NA = not active at 20 μg/mL for 72 h.
| Dexamethasone | |||||
| μM | 20 | 50 | 20 | 50 | 10 |
| iNOS expression | 86.14% ± 2.95% | 52.26% ± 3.74% | 71.88% ± 3.46% | 24.74% ± 0.02% | 29.34% ± 6.34% |
| COX-2 expression | 79.38% ± 5.00% | 60.17% ± 7.09% | 78.79% ± 2.18% | 49.79% ± 3.56% | 15.97% ± 2.50% |
a Dexamethasone was used as a positive control.