Literature DB >> 26034435

Outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation of acute proximal pole scaphoid fractures.

David M Brogan1, Steven L Moran2, Alexander Y Shin1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proximal pole scaphoid fractures are less common than waist fractures, and successful management can be difficult. We hypothesize that time to union is increased by delays in surgical fixation, greater initial displacement, and higher energy mechanisms of injury.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of acute proximal pole scaphoid fractures at our institution over a 19-year period. A review of clinical as well as radiographic data was undertaken. The mechanism of injury, patient demographics, timing of surgery, initial displacement, fixation method, smoking status, and lunate morphology were recorded. Functional outcome measures were recorded when available. Univariate analysis using Kaplan-Meier survival curves was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 10 out of 23 patients (43 %) showed evidence of union at 14 weeks post-injury. Rates of early union were higher in non-displaced fractures (70 %) when compared to displaced fractures (23 %). Similarly, fractures sustained via low energy mechanisms had a higher rate of early union compared to high energy mechanisms (69 versus 10 %). A delay in ORIF did not appear to influence rate of union.
CONCLUSIONS: Initial displacement and mechanism of injury have the most significant effects on early rates of union. Delay in ORIF of up to 28 days did not affect the rate of initial union, but the authors recommend early fixation of these fractures to prevent further displacement. Patients with widely displaced fractures or those with high energy mechanisms should be counseled regarding prolonged healing time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV-therapeutic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ORIF; Proximal pole; Scaphoid fracture

Year:  2015        PMID: 26034435      PMCID: PMC4447653          DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9689-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  15 in total

Review 1.  Management of acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal pole of the scaphoid.

Authors:  H Krimmer
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2002-06

Review 2.  Fractures and non-unions of the carpal scaphoid.

Authors:  R H Gelberman; B S Wolock; D B Siegel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Ununited fracture of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with avascular necrosis.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kakar; Alexander Y Shin
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Retrograde compression screw fixation of acute proximal pole scaphoid fractures.

Authors:  M E Rettig; K B Raskin
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  The vascularity of the scaphoid bone.

Authors:  R H Gelberman; J Menon
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Retrograde Herbert screw fixation for treatment of proximal pole scaphoid nonunions.

Authors:  R L DeMaagd; W D Engber
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 7.  Displaced fractures of the scaphoid.

Authors:  R M Szabo; D Manske
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The outcomes and complications of 1,2-intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicled vascularized bone grafting of scaphoid nonunions.

Authors:  Michael A Chang; Allen T Bishop; Steven L Moran; Alexander Y Shin
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  The fractured carpal scaphoid. Natural history and factors influencing outcome.

Authors:  I J Leslie; R A Dickson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1981-08

10.  Fractures of the scaphoid: a rational approach to management.

Authors:  W P Cooney; J H Dobyns; R L Linscheid
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Computer-assisted Surgery for Scaphoid Fracture.

Authors:  Zi-Run Xiao; Ge Xiong
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-07

2.  Current Management of Scaphoid Nonunion Based on the Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Kunihiro Oka; Hisao Moritomo
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2018-03-14

3.  Effect of Screw Length and Geometry on Interfragmentary Compression in a Simulated Proximal Pole Scaphoid Fracture Model.

Authors:  Samik Patel; Juan M Giugale; Richard E Debski; John R Fowler
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-08-20

4.  Biomechanical Strength of Retrograde Fixation in Proximal Third Scaphoid Fractures.

Authors:  Charles A Daly; Allison L Boden; William C Hutton; Michael B Gottschalk
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-04-04

Review 5.  [Advances in diagnosis and treatment of acute scaphoid fractures].

Authors:  Chenguang Yang; Liang Chen; Shaonan Hu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-04-15

6.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for scaphoid waist fracture with slight or no displacement: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Hangyu Li; Wenlai Guo; Shanshan Guo; Shishun Zhao; Rui Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Clinical and Epidemiological Features of Scaphoid Fracture Nonunion: A Hospital-Based Study in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Yaobin Yin; Ke Xu; Nan Zhang; Zhe Yi; Bo Liu; Shanlin Chen
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.