Douglas H Phanstiel1, Alan P Boyle2, Nastaran Heidari1, Michael P Snyder1. 1. Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 and. 2. Department of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Chromatin Interaction Analysis by Paired-End Tag sequencing (ChIA-PET) is an established method for detecting genome-wide looping interactions at high resolution. Current ChIA-PET analysis software packages either fail to correct for non-specific interactions due to genomic proximity or only address a fraction of the steps required for data processing. We present Mango, a complete ChIA-PET data analysis pipeline that provides statistical confidence estimates for interactions and corrects for major sources of bias including differential peak enrichment and genomic proximity. RESULTS: Comparison to the existing software packages, ChIA-PET Tool and ChiaSig revealed that Mango interactions exhibit much better agreement with high-resolution Hi-C data. Importantly, Mango executes all steps required for processing ChIA-PET datasets, whereas ChiaSig only completes 20% of the required steps. Application of Mango to multiple available ChIA-PET datasets permitted the independent rediscovery of known trends in chromatin loops including enrichment of CTCF, RAD21, SMC3 and ZNF143 at the anchor regions of interactions and strong bias for convergent CTCF motifs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Mango is open source and distributed through github at https://github.com/dphansti/mango. CONTACT: mpsnyder@standford.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Chromatin Interaction Analysis by Paired-End Tag sequencing (ChIA-PET) is an established method for detecting genome-wide looping interactions at high resolution. Current ChIA-PET analysis software packages either fail to correct for non-specific interactions due to genomic proximity or only address a fraction of the steps required for data processing. We present Mango, a complete ChIA-PET data analysis pipeline that provides statistical confidence estimates for interactions and corrects for major sources of bias including differential peak enrichment and genomic proximity. RESULTS: Comparison to the existing software packages, ChIA-PET Tool and ChiaSig revealed that Mango interactions exhibit much better agreement with high-resolution Hi-C data. Importantly, Mango executes all steps required for processing ChIA-PET datasets, whereas ChiaSig only completes 20% of the required steps. Application of Mango to multiple available ChIA-PET datasets permitted the independent rediscovery of known trends in chromatin loops including enrichment of CTCF, RAD21, SMC3 and ZNF143 at the anchor regions of interactions and strong bias for convergent CTCF motifs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION:Mango is open source and distributed through github at https://github.com/dphansti/mango. CONTACT: mpsnyder@standford.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Josée Dostie; Todd A Richmond; Ramy A Arnaout; Rebecca R Selzer; William L Lee; Tracey A Honan; Eric D Rubio; Anton Krumm; Justin Lamb; Chad Nusbaum; Roland D Green; Job Dekker Journal: Genome Res Date: 2006-09-05 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Marieke Simonis; Petra Klous; Erik Splinter; Yuri Moshkin; Rob Willemsen; Elzo de Wit; Bas van Steensel; Wouter de Laat Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2006-10-08 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Melissa J Fullwood; Mei Hui Liu; You Fu Pan; Jun Liu; Han Xu; Yusoff Bin Mohamed; Yuriy L Orlov; Stoyan Velkov; Andrea Ho; Poh Huay Mei; Elaine G Y Chew; Phillips Yao Hui Huang; Willem-Jan Welboren; Yuyuan Han; Hong Sain Ooi; Pramila N Ariyaratne; Vinsensius B Vega; Yanquan Luo; Peck Yean Tan; Pei Ye Choy; K D Senali Abayratna Wansa; Bing Zhao; Kar Sian Lim; Shi Chi Leow; Jit Sin Yow; Roy Joseph; Haixia Li; Kartiki V Desai; Jane S Thomsen; Yew Kok Lee; R Krishna Murthy Karuturi; Thoreau Herve; Guillaume Bourque; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Xiaoan Ruan; Valere Cacheux-Rataboul; Wing-Kin Sung; Edison T Liu; Chia-Lin Wei; Edwin Cheung; Yijun Ruan Journal: Nature Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Erez Lieberman-Aiden; Nynke L van Berkum; Louise Williams; Maxim Imakaev; Tobias Ragoczy; Agnes Telling; Ido Amit; Bryan R Lajoie; Peter J Sabo; Michael O Dorschner; Richard Sandstrom; Bradley Bernstein; M A Bender; Mark Groudine; Andreas Gnirke; John Stamatoyannopoulos; Leonid A Mirny; Eric S Lander; Job Dekker Journal: Science Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Yong Zhang; Tao Liu; Clifford A Meyer; Jérôme Eeckhoute; David S Johnson; Bradley E Bernstein; Chad Nusbaum; Richard M Myers; Myles Brown; Wei Li; X Shirley Liu Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2008-09-17 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Amit Pande; Jürgen Brosius; Izabela Makalowska; Wojciech Makalowski; Carsten A Raabe Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Jelena Petrovic; Yeqiao Zhou; Maria Fasolino; Naomi Goldman; Gregory W Schwartz; Maxwell R Mumbach; Son C Nguyen; Kelly S Rome; Yogev Sela; Zachary Zapataro; Stephen C Blacklow; Michael J Kruhlak; Junwei Shi; Jon C Aster; Eric F Joyce; Shawn C Little; Golnaz Vahedi; Warren S Pear; Robert B Faryabi Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Abraham S Weintraub; Charles H Li; Alicia V Zamudio; Alla A Sigova; Nancy M Hannett; Daniel S Day; Brian J Abraham; Malkiel A Cohen; Behnam Nabet; Dennis L Buckley; Yang Eric Guo; Denes Hnisz; Rudolf Jaenisch; James E Bradner; Nathanael S Gray; Richard A Young Journal: Cell Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Maxwell R Mumbach; Adam J Rubin; Ryan A Flynn; Chao Dai; Paul A Khavari; William J Greenleaf; Howard Y Chang Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 28.547