Literature DB >> 26033547

Serum levels of GFAP and EGFR in primary and recurrent high-grade gliomas: correlation to tumor volume, molecular markers, and progression-free survival.

Aida Kiviniemi1, Maria Gardberg2, Janek Frantzén3, Riitta Parkkola4, Ville Vuorinen3, Marko Pesola4, Heikki Minn5.   

Abstract

Our aim was to study the association of two potential serum biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with prognostic markers such as IDH1 mutation, tumor burden, and survival in patients with high-grade gliomas (HGG). Additionally, our objective was to evaluate the potential of serum EGFR as a surrogate marker for EGFR status in the tumor. Pre-operative serum samples were prospectively collected from patients with primary (n = 17) or recurrent (n = 10) HGG. Serum GFAP and EGFR levels were determined by ELISA and studied for correlation with molecular markers including EGFR amplification, tumor volume in contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI, and progression-free survival (PFS). Pre-operative serum GFAP level of ≥0.014 ng/ml was 86 % sensitive and 85 % specific for the diagnosis of glioblastoma. High GFAP was related to the lack of IDH1 mutation (P = 0.016), high Ki67 proliferation index (P < 0.001), and poor PFS (HR 5.9, CI 1.2-29.9, P = 0.032). Serum GFAP correlated with enhancing tumor volume in primary (r = 0.64 P = 0.005), but also in recurrent HGGs (r = 0.76 P = 0.011). In contrast, serum EGFR levels did not differ between HGG patients and 13 healthy controls, and were not related to EGFR status in the tumor. We conclude that high serum GFAP associates with IDH1 mutation-negative HGG, and poor PFS. Correlation with tumor burden in recurrent HGG implicates the potential of serum GFAP for detection of tumor recurrence. Our results suggest that circulating EGFR is not derived from glioma cells and cannot be used as a marker for EGFR status in the tumor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EGFR; GFAP; High-grade glioma; Prognosis; Serum biomarker; Tumor volume

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26033547     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1829-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  24 in total

1.  GFAP and S100B are biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  P E Vos; B Jacobs; T M J C Andriessen; K J B Lamers; G F Borm; T Beems; M Edwards; C F Rosmalen; J L M Vissers
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: imaging challenges in the assessment of posttreatment glioma.

Authors:  L C Hygino da Cruz; I Rodriguez; R C Domingues; E L Gasparetto; A G Sorensen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Glial fibrillary acidic protein: GFAP-thirty-one years (1969-2000).

Authors:  L F Eng; R S Ghirnikar; Y L Lee
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Pre- and post-operative plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein levels in patients with newly diagnosed gliomas.

Authors:  Hatim Husain; William Savage; Stuart A Grossman; Xiaobu Ye; Peter C Burger; Allen Everett; Chetan Bettegowda; Luis A Diaz; Cherie Blair; Katharine E Romans; Matthias Holdhoff
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma.

Authors:  Hiroko Ohgaki; Paul Kleihues
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  Epidermal growth factor receptor: a re-emerging target in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Monika E Hegi; Premnath Rajakannu; Michael Weller
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 7.  Epidemiology of brain tumors.

Authors:  Hiroko Ohgaki
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

8.  Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Naoki Shinojima; Kenji Tada; Shoji Shiraishi; Takanori Kamiryo; Masato Kochi; Hideo Nakamura; Keishi Makino; Hideyuki Saya; Hirofumi Hirano; Jun-Ichi Kuratsu; Koji Oka; Yasuji Ishimaru; Yukitaka Ushio
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Epidermal growth factor receptor serum levels and prognostic value in malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Michele Quaranta; Rosa Divella; Antonella Daniele; Silvia Di Tardo; Maria Teresa Venneri; Ivan Lolli; Giuseppe Troccoli
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2007 May-Jun

Review 10.  What do we know about IDH1/2 mutations so far, and how do we use it?

Authors:  Craig Horbinski
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 15.887

View more
  17 in total

1.  Serum concentrations of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) do not indicate tumor recurrence in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Julia-Mareen Vietheer; Johannes Rieger; Marlies Wagner; Christian Senft; Julia Tichy; Christian Foerch
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Pre- and early postoperative GFAP serum levels in glioma and brain metastases.

Authors:  Peter Baumgarten; Johanna Quick-Weller; Florian Gessler; Marlies Wagner; Julia Tichy; Marie-Therese Forster; Christian Foerch; Volker Seifert; Michel Mittelbronn; Christian Senft
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Prospective evaluation of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as a diagnostic marker for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Julia Tichy; Sabrina Spechtmeyer; Michel Mittelbronn; Elke Hattingen; Johannes Rieger; Christian Senft; Christian Foerch
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia following temozolomide treatment in a patient with glioblastoma: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Pengfei Liu; Peiwen Li; Ting Lei; Limei Qu; Haiyan Huang; Qingchun Mu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  The Role of Preoperative Neutrophil, Platelet, and Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratios as Independent Prognostic Factors for Patient Survival in WHO 2021 Glioblastoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  George S Stoyanov; Emran Lyutfi; Reneta Georgieva; Deyan L Dzhenkov; Lilyana Petkova; Borislav D Ivanov; Ara Kaprelyan; Peter Ghenev
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-09

Review 6.  The road-map for establishment of a prognostic molecular marker panel in glioma using liquid biopsy: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Richa Shrivastava; Puneet Gandhi; Ragini Gothalwal
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.340

7.  Plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Copeptin, and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Concentrations among West African Stroke Subjects Compared with Stroke-Free Controls.

Authors:  Fred S Sarfo; Dorcas Owusu; Sheila Adamu; Dominic Awuah; Lambert Appiah; Mansa Amamoo; Aloysius Loglo; Mayowa Owolabi; Bruce Ovbiagele
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 8.  Blood GFAP as an emerging biomarker in brain and spinal cord disorders.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelhak; Matteo Foschi; Samir Abu-Rumeileh; John K Yue; Lucio D'Anna; Andre Huss; Patrick Oeckl; Albert C Ludolph; Jens Kuhle; Axel Petzold; Geoffrey T Manley; Ari J Green; Markus Otto; Hayrettin Tumani
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 44.711

Review 9.  Molecular and Circulating Biomarkers of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Wojciech Jelski; Barbara Mroczko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Blood-Based Biomarkers for Glioma in the Context of Gliomagenesis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hamza Ali; Romée Harting; Ralph de Vries; Meedie Ali; Thomas Wurdinger; Myron G Best
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.