Literature DB >> 26033457

Male burying beetles extend, not reduce, parental care duration when reproductive competition is high.

P E Hopwood1, A J Moore1,2, T Tregenza1, N J Royle1.   

Abstract

Male parents spend less time caring than females in many species with biparental care. The traditional explanation for this pattern is that males have lower confidence of parentage, so they desert earlier in favour of pursuing other mating opportunities. However, one recent alternative hypothesis is that prolonged male parental care might also evolve if staying to care actively improves paternity. If this is the case, an increase in reproductive competition should be associated with increased paternal care. To test this prediction, we manipulated the level of reproductive competition experienced by burying beetles, Nicrophorus vespilloides (Herbst, 1783). We found that caregiving males stayed for longer and mated more frequently with their partner when reproductive competition was greater. Reproductive productivity did not increase when males extended care. Our findings provide support for the increased paternity hypothesis. Extended duration of parental care may be a male tactic both protecting investment (in the current brood) and maximizing paternity (in subsequent brood(s) via female stored sperm) even if this fails to maximize current reproductive productivity and creates conflict of interest with their mate via costs associated with increased mating frequency.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  parental care; paternal care; paternity assurance; phenotypic plasticity; sexual conflict

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26033457     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  11 in total

1.  Biparental care is predominant and beneficial to parents in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis (Coleoptera: Silphidae).

Authors:  Kyle M Benowitz; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.138

2.  Why does it take two to tango? Lifetime fitness consequences of parental care in a burying beetle.

Authors:  Ashlee N Smith; J Curtis Creighton; Mark C Belk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Development and application of 14 microsatellite markers in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides reveals population genetic differentiation at local spatial scales.

Authors:  Sonia Pascoal; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Adaptation to monogamy influences parental care but not mating behavior in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.

Authors:  Matthew Schrader; Madolin K Keller; Garrett F Lucey
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Carry on caring: infected females maintain their parental care despite high mortality.

Authors:  Tom Ratz; Katy M Monteith; Pedro F Vale; Per T Smiseth
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Paternal care and litter size coevolution in mammals.

Authors:  Paula Stockley; Liane Hobson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Do female Nicrophorus vespilloides reduce direct costs by choosing males that mate less frequently?

Authors:  P E Hopwood; G P F Mazué; M J Carter; M L Head; A J Moore; N J Royle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  The effect of size and sex ratio experiences on reproductive competition in Nicrophorus vespilloides burying beetles in the wild.

Authors:  P E Hopwood; A J Moore; T Tregenza; N J Royle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Selection on an antagonistic behavioral trait can drive rapid genital coevolution in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.

Authors:  Paul E Hopwood; Megan L Head; Eleanor J Jordan; Mauricio J Carter; Emma Davey; Allen J Moore; Nick J Royle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Constrained flexibility of parental cooperation limits adaptive responses to harsh conditions.

Authors:  Jeanette B Moss; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.