| Literature DB >> 26032124 |
Yuguang Zhang1, Jing Cong1,2, Hui Lu1, Guangliang Li1, Yadong Xue1, Ye Deng3,4, Hui Li5, Jizhong Zhou4, Diqiang Li1.
Abstract
Understanding biological diversity elevational pattern and the driver factors are indispensable to develop the ecological theories. Elevational gradient may minimize the impact of environmental factors and is the ideal places to study soil microbial elevational patterns. In this study, we selected four typical vegetation types from 1000 to 2800 m above the sea level on the northern slope of Shennongjia Mountain in central China, and analysed the soil bacterial community composition, elevational patterns and the relationship between soil bacterial diversity and environmental factors by using the 16S rRNA Illumina sequencing and multivariate statistical analysis. The results revealed that the dominant bacterial phyla were Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia, which accounted for over 75% of the bacterial sequences obtained from tested samples, and the soil bacterial operational taxonomic unit (OTU) richness was a significant monotonous decreasing (P < 0.01) trend with the elevational increasing. The similarity of soil bacterial population composition decreased significantly (P < 0.01) with elevational distance increased as measured by the Jaccard and Bray-Curtis index. Canonical correspondence analysis and Mantel test analysis indicated that plant diversity and soil pH were significantly correlated (P < 0.01) with the soil bacterial community. Therefore, the soil bacterial diversity on Shennongjia Mountain had a significant and different elevational pattern, and plant diversity and soil pH may be the key factors in shaping the soil bacterial spatial pattern.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26032124 PMCID: PMC4476828 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Site information and soil biogeochemical characteristic in this study
| Study site | EBF1050 | DBF1750 | CF2550 | SAS2750 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 1009–1057 m | 1725–1844 m | 2530–2590 m | 2720–2776 m |
| Vegetation types | Evergreen broadleaved forest | Deciduous broadleaved forest | Coniferous forest | Subalpine shrub |
| Soil organic carbon (g kg−1) | 52.58 ± 10.21b | 28.22 ± 1.01a | 59.51 ± 5.25b | 60.95 ± 4.98b |
| Total nitrogen (g kg−1) | 4.14 ± 0.63b | 1.83 ± 0.12a | 4.22 ± 0.30b | 4.50 ± 0.36b |
| Available nitrogen (g kg−1) | 0.29 ± 0.03b | 0.18 ± 0.01a | 0.33 ± 0.03bc | 0.42 ± 0.04c |
| The ratio of SOC to TN | 12.25 ± 0.53a | 15.74 ± 0.73c | 14.00 ± 0.50b | 13.52 ± 0.13ab |
| Soil pH | 6.58 ± 0.32c | 5.36 ± 0.19b | 4.99 ± 0.05b | 4.38 ± 0.03a |
| Soil moisture (%) | 37.47 ± 2.30b | 49.13 ± 1.69c | 44.52 ± 1.60c | 28.86 ± 1.10a |
| Soil temperature at a 10 cm depth (°C) | 20.02 ± 1.78d | 16.71 ± 0.12c | 10.83 ± 0.18a | 12.07 ± 0.35b |
| Shannon index of plant | 2.73 ± 0.16c | 2.41 ± 0.14bc | 2.10 ± 0.09b | 0.84 ± 0.10a |
Data present the mean value and standard error (n = 8). The same lowercase letters within the same row mean the difference was not significant, whereas the difference was significant P < 0.05.
Summary of OTU number, Chao 1, Shannon and Simpson indices based on relative abundance of bacterial sequences at four different sites
| Sample | No. of OTUs (0.03) | Chao1 | Shannon index | Simpson index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBF1050 | 8208.38 ± 269.82c | 18284.82 ± 1382.19ab | 8.14 ± 0.09c | 894.37 ± 163.85b |
| DBF1750 | 7490.50 ± 154.72b | 20801.44 ± 1531.48b | 7.75 ± 0.04b | 330.32 ± 65.76a |
| CF2550 | 6544.00 ± 272.93a | 18494.40 ± 1361.45ab | 6.99 ± 0.19a | 82.96 ± 37.67a |
| SAS2750 | 6250.50 ± 187.08a | 15972.55 ± 547.60a | 7.43 ± 0.09b | 253.66 ± 70.68a |
Data present the mean value and standard error (n = 8). The same lowercase letters within the same row mean the difference was not significant, whereas the difference was significant P < 0.05.
Fig 1Detrended correspondence analysis of soil bacteria community structure based on the relative abundance of detected bacterial sequence number.
Fig 2The regression relationship between soil microbial OTUs richness and elevation.
Fig 3Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial phyla in soil separated according to study sites. All data are presented as mean± SE. Different letters indicated statistical differences at a P value of < 0.05 among sampling sites by ONE ANOVA.
Fig 4The regression relationship between the beta diversity of Jaccard (A) and Bray–Curtis (B) index and change in elevation distance.
Partial Mantel analysis on the relationship between the relative abundance of dominant phyla and soil characteristics or plant properties
| Phylum | Soil, | Plant, | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | r | |||
| All phylotypes | 0.634 | 0.001 | 0.330 | 0.001 |
| 0.578 | 0.001 | 0.196 | 0.023 | |
| 0.536 | 0.001 | 0.191 | 0.045 | |
| 0.343 | 0.002 | 0.125 | 0.133 | |
| 0.101 | 0.163 | 0.444 | 0.001 | |
| 0.481 | 0.001 | 0.281 | 0.001 | |
| 0.572 | 0.001 | 0.319 | 0.002 | |
| 0.196 | 0.015 | 0.306 | 0.001 | |
| 0.555 | 0.001 | 0.105 | 0.219 | |
| 0.389 | 0.001 | 0.250 | 0.004 | |
| 0.424 | 0.001 | 0.309 | 0.002 | |
| 0.505 | 0.001 | 0.159 | 0.046 | |
| 0.551 | 0.001 | −0.033 | 0.635 | |
Selected soil variables: soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, available nitrogen, soil moisture, soil pH and soil temperature at the depth of 0–10 cm.
Selected plant variables: the Shannon index of tree and shrub.
Fig 5The relationship analysis between soil microbial functional gene diversity and environmental variables.A. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of relative abundance data and soil environmental variables that were significantly related to microbial variations, C/N: the ratio of soil organic carbon to soil total nitrogen.B. Variation partitioning analysis (VPA) of microbial diversity explained by soil chemical factors (soil, including soil organic carbon, available nitrogen, the ratio of soil organic carbon to total nitrogen, soil moisture and pH), soil temperature (temp) and plant diversity (the Shannon index of trees and shrubs), and their relationships. Each diagram represents the biological variation partitioned into the relative effects of each factor or a combination of factors, in which geometric areas were proportional to the percentages of explained variation.