Literature DB >> 26031274

Prospective Evaluation of Weight-Based Prophylactic Enoxaparin Dosing in Critically Ill Trauma Patients: Adequacy of AntiXa Levels Is Improved.

Jade M Nunez1, Robert D Becher, Gerald J Rebo, Jason P Farrah, Erika M Borgerding, Joseph J Stirparo, Cynthia Lauer, Patrick Kilgo, Preston R Miller.   

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of death in multisystem trauma patients; the importance of VTE prevention is well recognized. Presently, standard dose enoxaparin (30 mg BID) is used as chemical prophylaxis, regardless of weight or physiologic status. However, evidence suggests decreased bioavailability of enoxaparin in critically ill patients. Therefore, we hypothesized that a weight-based enoxaparin dosing regimen would provide more adequate prophylaxis (as indicated by antifactor Xa levels) for patients in our trauma intensive care unit (TICU).These data were prospectively collected in TICU patients admitted over a 5-month period given twice daily 0.6 mg/kg enoxaparin (actual body weight). Patients were compared with a historical cohort receiving standard dosing. Anti-Xa levels were collected at 11.5 hours (trough, goal ≥ 0.1 IU/mL) after each evening administration. Patient demographics, admission weight, dose, and daily anti-Xa levels were recorded. Patients with renal insufficiency or brain, spine, or spinal cord injury were excluded. Data were collected from 26 patients in the standard-dose group and 37 in the weight-based group. Sixty-four trough anti-Xa measurements were taken in the standard dose group and 74 collected in the weight-based group. Evaluating only levels measured after the third dose, the change in dosing of enoxaparin from 30 to 0.6 mg/kg resulted in an increased percentage of patients with goal antifactor Xa levels from 8 per cent to 61 per cent (P < 0.0001). Examining all troughs, the change in dose resulted in an increase in patients with a goal anti-Xa level from 19 to 59 per cent (P < 0.0001). Weight-based dosing of enoxaparin in trauma ICU patients yields superior results with respect to adequate anti-Xa levels when compared with standard dosing. These findings suggest that weight-based dosing may provide superior VTE prophylaxis in TICU patients. Evaluation of the effects of this dosing paradigm on actual VTE rate is ongoing at our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26031274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  11 in total

1.  Unfractionated heparin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma.

Authors:  Benjamin N Jacobs; Anne H Cain-Nielsen; Jill L Jakubus; Judy N Mikhail; John J Fath; Scott E Regenbogen; Mark R Hemmila
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Assessment of Anti-Factor Xa Levels of Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery Given Once-Daily Enoxaparin Prophylaxis: A Clinical Study Examining Enoxaparin Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Kory I Fleming; Corinne B Bertolaccini; Ann Marie Prazak; Lyen C Huang; T Bartley Pickron
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Venous thromboembolic events in critically ill traumatic brain injury patients.

Authors:  Markus B Skrifvars; Michael Bailey; Jeffrey Presneill; Craig French; Alistair Nichol; Lorraine Little; Jacques Duranteau; Olivier Huet; Samir Haddad; Yaseen Arabi; Colin McArthur; D James Cooper; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Low anti-Factor Xa level predicts 90-day Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients Receiving Enoxaparin Prophylaxis: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Kory I Fleming; Thomas K Varghese; John Stringham; Lyen C Huang; T Bartley Pickron; Ann Marie Prazak; Corinne Bertolaccini; Arash Momeni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Prophylactic Enoxaparin in Critically Ill Trauma Patients: Evaluation of the Initial Dose.

Authors:  Kaitlyn J Agedal; Elizabeth A Feldman; Robert W Seabury; William Darko; Luke A Probst; Christopher D Miller; Gregory M Cwikla
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2021-12-27

6.  Clinical Characteristics, Management Practices, and In-hospital Outcomes among Trauma Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Gustav Strandvik; Ayman El-Menyar; Mohammad Asim; Sagar Galwankar; Hassan Al-Thani
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2020-06-10

7.  Impact of antithrombin III and enoxaparin dosage adjustment on prophylactic anti-Xa concentrations in trauma patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism: a randomized pilot trial.

Authors:  Molly Elizabeth Droege; Christopher Allen Droege; Carolyn Dosen Philpott; Megan Leslie Webb; Neil Edward Ernst; Krishna Athota; Devin Wakefield; Joseph Richard Dowd; Dina Gomaa; Bryce H R Robinson; Dennis Hanseman; Joel Elterman; Eric William Mueller
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Updated guidelines to reduce venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: A Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm.

Authors:  Eric J Ley; Carlos V R Brown; Ernest E Moore; Jack A Sava; Kimberly Peck; David J Ciesla; Jason L Sperry; Anne G Rizzo; Nelson G Rosen; Karen J Brasel; Rosemary Kozar; Kenji Inaba; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 9.  Weight-based dosing in medication use: what should we know?

Authors:  Sheng-Dong Pan; Ling-Ling Zhu; Meng Chen; Ping Xia; Quan Zhou
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Characterizing the delays in adequate thromboprophylaxis after TBI.

Authors:  Navpreet K Dhillon; Yassar M Hashim; Naomi Berezin; Felix Yong; Geena Conde; Russell Mason; Eric J Ley
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2021-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.