Literature DB >> 26029396

Crystal structure of {2,2'-[N,N'-bis-(pyridin-2-yl-meth-yl)cyclo-hexane-trans-1,2-diyldi(nitrilo)]di-acetato}-cobalt(III) hexa-fluorido-phosphate.

Craig C McLauchlan1, Daniel S Kissel2, Albert W Herlinger2.   

Abstract

The title compound [Co(C22H26N4O4)]PF6, commonly known as [Co(bpcd)]PF6, where bpcd(2-) is derived from the historical ligand name N,N'-bis-(2-pyridyl-meth-yl)-trans-1,2-di-amino-cyclo-hexane-N,N'-di-acetate, crystallized by slow evaporation of a saturated aceto-nitrile solution in air. The cation of the hexa-fluorido-phosphate salt has the Co(III) atom in a distorted octa-hedral coordination geometry provided by an N4O2 donor atom set. The acetate groups, which are oriented trans with respect to each other, exhibit monodentate coordination whereas the pyridyl N atoms are coordinating in a cis configuration. The geometry of the cation is compared to the geometries of other di-amino di-acetate complexes with Co(III).

Entities:  

Keywords:  chelating ligand; cobalt(III); crystal structure; polyamino­carb­oxy­lic acid

Year:  2015        PMID: 26029396      PMCID: PMC4438832          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015005149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Polyamino­carb­oxy­lic acids are of considerable inter­est as complexation reagents for a variety of metal ions in a wide range of applications (Weaver & Kappelmann, 1964 ▸; Weiner & Thakur, 1995 ▸; Caravan et al., 1997a ▸,b ▸; Geraldes, 1999 ▸; Heitzmann et al., 2009 ▸). The title compound, [Co(bpcd)]PF6, (I), was prepared from N,N′-bis­(2-pyridyl­meth­yl)-trans-1,2-di­amino­cyclo­hexane-N,N′-di­acetic acid (H2bpcd), a sym­metrically disubstituted polyamino­carb­oxy­lic acid featuring a chiral trans-di­amino­cyclo­hexane backbone. The ligand precursor, H2bpcd, belongs to a relatively small group of di­amino di­acetic acids that contain softer aromatic nitro­gen donor groups (Fig. 1 ▸) (Caravan et al., 1997a ▸; Heitzmann et al., 2009 ▸; Kissel et al., 2014 ▸). The preorganized ligand precursor H2bpcd is of inter­est as a novel candidate for selective and efficient actinide(III)/lanthanide(III) separations. Preorganization of a ligand can reduce the pre-orientation energy required for metal ion complexation and provide improved metal–ligand complex stability (Rizkalla et al., 1987 ▸; Choppin et al., 2006 ▸; Ogden et al., 2012 ▸). The addition of aromatic functionalities, such as pyridine and pyrazine, may increase ligand selectivity for softer metal ions and provide greater stability towards radiolysis (Heitzmann et al., 2009 ▸). The members of this group of di­acetic acids, however, differ in the nature of the di­amine backbone.
Figure 1

The di­amino di­acetic acids, H2bped (A) and gem-H2bped (B), where bped stands for bis­(2-pyridyl­meth­yl)-1,2-di­amino­ethane di­acetate, H2bpcd (C), and H2bppd (D), where bppd stands for bis­(2-pyridyl­meth­yl)-1,3-di­amino­propane di­acetate.

The ethyl­enedi­amine backbone is a classic scaffold that has been used for the construction of many polydentate ligands. The amine N atoms are ideal for functionalization, which allows different donor atom groups to be incorporated into a ligand’s design. The close proximity of the di­amine nitro­gens also maximizes the number of possible five- and six-membered chelate rings capable of forming upon metal ion complexation. H2bped (A) is a hexa­dentate 2-pyridyl­methyl-substituted di­acetic acid based on this classic scaffold (Lacoste et al., 1965 ▸; Caravan et al., 1997a ▸). gem-H2bped (B) is a very closely related 2-pyridyl­methyl-substituted di­acetic acid that is also based on the ethyl­enedi­amine scaffold. In this case, however, both pyridine substituents are bonded to the same amine N atom (Heitzmann et al., 2009 ▸). The C—C chain length between the N atoms in the di­amine backbone of these ligands allows for the formation of five-membered chelate rings. Hancock has shown the formation of five-membered chelate rings to be more favourable for larger metal ions than for smaller metal ions (Hancock & Martell, 1989 ▸). The ligand precursor, H2bpcd (C), for the title compound is similar to A and B, but it incorporates the ethyl­enedi­amine backbone into a cyclo­hexyl group. Restricted rotation about the C—C bonds in the cyclo­hexane ring fixes the positions of the trans di­amine nitro­gen atoms and favourably preorganizes these donor groups for metal ion complexation. Consequently, the trans amine groups are constrained into a conformation that is pre-oriented favorably for binding and results in a complex of increased stability (Rizkalla et al., 1987 ▸; Choppin et al., 2006 ▸; Ogden et al., 2012 ▸). In contrast, H2bppd (D) features a 1,3-di­amino­propane backbone that provides greater flexibility compared to A, B, or C with their shorter backbones. Further, the increased chain length of the propyl­ene linker allows a six-membered chelate ring to form upon metal complexation. Formation of six-membered chelate rings in complexes with smaller metal ions has been shown to increase the stability of the complex relative to five-membered rings (Hancock & Martell, 1989 ▸). Here, we report the structure of a CoIII complex with bpcd2−, C.

Structural commentary

The structure of the [Co(bpcd)]+ cation in the title compound is shown in Fig. 2 ▸ and selected geometric parameters are listed in Table 1 ▸. The cation is very similar to the structures of the [Co(bped)]+ and [Co(bppd)]+ complex ions. Nearly all of the CoOac bond lengths for the five structures given in Table 1 ▸ are within experimental error of each other. One of the CoOac bond lengths in the [Co(bppd)]+ cation, however, is slightly shorter than the others. The C—O and C=O bond lengths are also quite similar. There are, however, some variations in the bond lengths and angles as shown in Tables 1 ▸ and 2 ▸. The Co—Nam bond length in the [Co(bpcd)]+ cation is slightly shorter than the Co—Nam bond lengths reported for the two [Co(bppd)]+ cations given in Table 1 ▸. They are, however, slightly longer than those reported for the [Co(bped)]+ structures. Similarly, the Nam1—Co—Nam2 bond angle in [Co(bpcd)]+ is close to ideal (90°), whereas the Nam1—Co—Nam2 angles in the [Co(bppd)]+ structures are somewhat larger than ideal and somewhat smaller than ideal in the [Co(bped)]+ structures (Table 2 ▸). The Oac1—Co—Oac2 bond angles for the five structures in Table 2 ▸ are all close to ideal (180°), with the largest deviation from linearity observed in the[Co(bpcd)]+ cation. The 176.1° Oac1—Co—Oac2 bond angle in [Co(bpcd)]+ is 2° smaller than the average (178.5°) of the bond angles reported for the [Co(bped)]+ and [Co(bppd)]+ cations. Finally, the CoIII in the title compound is situated directly in the N4 plane of the equatorial nitro­gen atoms, whereas in three of the other four structures the CoIII lays slightly out-of the plane (Table 1 ▸). The solid-state structural parameters for [Co(bpcd)]+, which are very similar to those for Co(bped)+, suggest that the ligand precusor H2(bpcd), with its preorganized arrangement, may provide greater metal ion complex stability as well as be selective for actinides(III) over lanthanides(III) as demonstrated for gem-H2(bped). (Heitzmann et al., 2009 ▸)
Figure 2

View of the cation of the title structure, [Co(bpcd)]+. Here and in subsequent figures, displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. H atoms are shown as circles of arbitrary size. [Symmetry code: (i) −x + 1, −y + , z.]

Table 1

Bond distances () and experimental data for different [Co(bpad)]+ structures

Bond ()Co(bped)+ a Co(bped)+ b Co(bppd)+ c 1Co(bppd)+ c 2Co(bpcd)+ d
CoOac1 1.888(1)1.878(2)1.8828(11)1.8875(10)1.8869(8)
CoOac2 1.889(2)1.888(2)1.8899(11)1.8830(11)*
CoNam1 1.941(2)1.937(2)1.9625(13)1.9654(12)1.9548(9)
CoNam2 1.974(2)1.941(2)1.9641(13)1.9645(12)*
CoNpyr1 1.944(2)1.960(2)1.9484(13)1.9403(13)1.9448(9)
CoNpyr2 1.954(2)1.958(2)1.9397(13)1.9576(13)*
COac1 1.294(2)1.298(4)1.2973(18)1.3054(18)1.3029(13)
COac1 1.212(3)1.218(3)1.2265(18)1.219(2)1.2212(14)
COac2 1.289(3)1.299(3)1.3035(19)1.2971(19)*
COac2 1.210(3)1.213(3)1.2201(19)0.0030(6)*
Co above N/N/N/N plane0.000 0.012 0.0026(6)0.0030(6)0**
Temp, K298293100100100

Notes: (a) Mandel Douglas (1989 ▸); (b) Caravan et al. (1997a ▸); (c) two cations in asymmetric unit (McLauchlan et al., 2013 ▸); (d) this work; (*) N/A symmetry equivalent; () standard uncertainty unavailable; (**) N/A sits on a special position.

Table 2

Selected bond angles () for different [Co(bpad)]+ structures

Angle, Co(bped)+ a Co(bped)+ b Co(bppd)+ c 1Co(bppd)+ c 2Co(bpcd)+ d
Oac1CoOac2 178.8(1)178.53(8)178.47(5)178.36(5)176.08(5)
Nam1CoNam2 82.0(1)88.87(9)95.91(5)95.92(5)89.33(5)
Npyr1CoNpyr2 82.3(1)107.01(9)98.52(6)98.55(5)106.74(5)
Nam1CoNpyr1 89.3(1)82.14(9)82.36(6)83.23(5)82.17(4)
Nam2CoNpyr2 107.0(1)82.51(9)83.28(6)82.39(5)*
Nam1CoOac1 86.9(1)87.36(9)88.81(5)87.96(5)87.84(4)
Npyr1CoOac1 92.8(1)92.34(8)86.51(5)87.72(5)89.92(4)
OCOac 124.4(2)123.9(3)123.87(14)123.80(14)124.95(10)
 124.7(2)124.8(3)123.95(15)123.82(14)*
C(O)OacCo116.4(1)116.4(2)114.32(9)115.33(10)114.57(7)
 115.9(1)115.3(2)115.11(10)114.38(9)*

Notes: (a) Mandel Douglas (1989 ▸); (b) Caravan et al. (1997a ▸); (c) two cations in asymmetric unit (McLauchlan et al., 2013 ▸); (d) this work; (*) N/A symmetry equivalent; (**) N/A sits on a special position.

Supra­molecular features

The structure of the title compound (Fig. 3 ▸) exists in the solid state as an intricate network of anions and cations closely associated through many short inter­actions. Hydrogen-bonding inter­actions are listed in Table 3 ▸. Each PF6 − anion is in close contact with six cations: three of the four unique F atoms inter­act with two neighboring cations while the remaining atom, F4, has a long inter­action (2.29 Å) with only the C—H9A bond of the cyclo­hexyl ring of one cation. This F4⋯H9A inter­action is the shortest of the F⋯H inter­actions present with two other weaker F⋯H inter­actions of 2.49 (F1⋯H10A) and 2.64 Å (F1⋯H9A) to cyclo­hexyl H atoms. There are also several inter­actions between pyrdidyl ring H atoms and carboxyl­ate O atoms from neighboring cations, i.e. a 2.408 Å inter­action with Co-bound oxygen O1, and a 2.700 Å inter­action with terminal oxygen O2. The short inter­action has a C—H⋯O angle of 140.7° so it does not appear in Table 3 ▸. There also exists π–π stacking for each of the two pyridyl rings with neighboring cations stacked anti­parallel. Each has a distance of 3.829 (13) Å between ring centroids.
Figure 3

View of the molecular components of the title structure, [Co(bpcd)]PF6. [Symmetry code: (i) −x + 1, −y + , z.]

Table 3

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
C1H1AO2ii 0.952.843.4475(15)122
C2H2AF3iii 0.952.513.2928(15)139
C4H4AO2iv 0.952.703.5907(15)157
C6H6AF2v 0.992.523.4243(13)152
C6H6BF1vi 0.992.743.3824(13)123
C6H6BF3vi 0.992.843.8229(18)170
C7H7AF4vii 0.992.683.3879(13)128
C7H7AF4iv 0.992.673.2436(13)117
C7H7BF3v 0.992.623.4982(16)147
C9H9AF1vi 1.002.643.2790(12)122
C9H9AF4vi 1.002.293.2336(13)157
C10H10AF1vi 0.992.493.1429(15)123
C10H10AF2v 0.992.353.0728(14)129
C10H10BF4iv 0.992.773.5399(14)135

Symmetry codes: (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) ; (vii) .

Database survey

There is very little information in the literature about H2bpcd and its metal complexes. There is a structurally characterized hepta­coordinate [FeII(H2bpcd)(C3H6O)](ClO4)2 complex with trans pyridine N atoms and cis carb­oxy­lic acid groups (Oddon et al., 2012 ▸). In that case, FeII is coordinated in a distorted penta­gonal–bipyramidal geometry with an unusual N4O3 donor atom set, including a bound acetone mol­ecule. The carb­oxy­lic acid moieties are fully protonated with the H2bpcd ligand coordinating through the carbonyl O atoms, which reside in the equatorial plane. The coordinating amine N atoms also lie in this plane, whereas the pyridyl N atoms are coordinating at the axial positions. This unique arrangement results in longer Fe—O and Fe—Npy bonds than are typically observed. In the present case, a fully deprotonated bpcd2− ligand binds CoIII in a pseudo-octa­hedral fashion with trans acetate groups to form a hexa­coordinate complex. Although only one structure of a metalH2bpcd complex has been reported in the literature, there are several structures reported for related pseudo-octa­hedral CoIII complexes with bis-2-pyridyl­methyl substituted di­amino di­acetic acids, i.e. H2bped (A) and H2bppd (D) in Fig. 1 ▸. We previously reported the structure of [Co(bppd)]PF6 (McLauchlan et al., 2013 ▸), and there are two structural reports for the [Co(bped)]+ complex ion with different counter-ions, e.g. BF4 − and PF6 − (Mandel & Douglas, 1989 ▸; Caravan et al., 1997a ▸). In these cases, the CoIII–bppd2− and CoIII–bped2− complexes form similar hexa­dentate structures with acetate O atoms in a trans orientation and pyridyl N atoms in a cis orientation.

Synthesis and crystallization

H2bpcd (C) was prepared from trans-1,2-di­amino­cyclo­hexane using the procedure reported for H2bppd (D) (Kissel et al., 2014 ▸). The title compound was prepared using methods analogous to those previously reported for [Co(bppd)]PF6 (McLauchlan et al., 2013 ▸). Crystals suitable for diffraction were isolated by slow evaporation of a saturated aceto­nitrile solution (yield: 120 mg, 0.20 mmol, 40%). Analysis observed (calculated) for CoC22H28N4O4PF6: C 42.56 (43.00), H 3.85 (4.26), N 8.94 (9.11). IR (ν cm−1, KBr): 3048 (m, C—H aryl str), 2945 (m, CH2 str), 1665 (vs, COO− str), 1612 (m, py str), 1477 (w, py str), 1445 (m, CH2 def), 1384 (s, COO− str).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 4 ▸. The structure of the title complex can be solved and refined in Ibca with well-separated cations and anions. There is a small amount of disorder that can be modelled for the PF6 − anion. F2 and F3 can be moved in the plane. R1 can be reduced to 0.0252 by modeling this disorder, but the occupancy is less than 10% and results in a less chemically satisfactory PF6 − anion. Therefore, the disorder was not modelled. All H atoms were placed geometrically (C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å) and refined using a riding model.
Table 4

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Co(C22H26N4O4)]PF6
M r 614.37
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, I b c a
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c ()13.9848(4), 14.6221(4), 22.2177(6)
V (3)4543.2(2)
Z 8
Radiation typeMo K
(mm1)0.92
Crystal size (mm)0.44 0.36 0.21
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII equipped with a CCD detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
T min, T max 0.691, 0.834
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections57644, 3630, 3401
R int 0.017
(sin /)max (1)0.725
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.027, 0.079, 1.12
No. of reflections3630
No. of parameters174
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
max, min (e 3)0.66, 0.52

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2008 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸), enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015005149/zl2616sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015005149/zl2616Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015005149/zl2616Isup3.cdx CCDC reference: 1053810 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Co(C22H26N4O4)]PF6Dx = 1.796 Mg m3
Mr = 614.37Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, IbcaCell parameters from 9742 reflections
a = 13.9848 (4) Åθ = 2.7–31.0°
b = 14.6221 (4) ŵ = 0.92 mm1
c = 22.2177 (6) ÅT = 100 K
V = 4543.2 (2) Å3Parallelipiped, translucent dark red
Z = 80.44 × 0.36 × 0.21 mm
F(000) = 2512
Bruker APEXII diffractometer equipped with a CCD detector3630 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3401 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.017
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1θmax = 31.0°, θmin = 1.8°
φ and ω scansh = −20→20
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)k = −21→21
Tmin = 0.691, Tmax = 0.834l = −32→32
57644 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.079H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.12w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0415P)2 + 5.6191P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3630 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
174 parametersΔρmax = 0.66 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.52 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. There is a small amount of disorder that can be modeled for the PF6 anion. F2 and F3 can be moved in the plane, as one might imagine. R1 can be reduced to 0.0252 by modeling it, but the occupancy is less than 10% and results in a less chemically satisfactory PF6 anion. Therefore, the disorder was not modeled.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Co10.50000.25000.09254 (2)0.00761 (6)
N10.43958 (7)0.15960 (6)0.04005 (4)0.01066 (16)
N20.43848 (6)0.17734 (6)0.15480 (4)0.00930 (16)
O10.38813 (6)0.32200 (5)0.08964 (3)0.01162 (15)
O20.23055 (6)0.30823 (7)0.10495 (4)0.01942 (18)
C10.41181 (8)0.16885 (8)−0.01758 (5)0.01342 (19)
H1A0.41890.2265−0.03690.016*
C20.37301 (8)0.09611 (8)−0.04959 (5)0.0159 (2)
H2A0.35550.1035−0.09060.019*
C30.36018 (8)0.01258 (8)−0.02102 (6)0.0160 (2)
H3A0.3356−0.0384−0.04260.019*
C40.38383 (8)0.00449 (8)0.03974 (5)0.0145 (2)
H4A0.3729−0.05110.06070.017*
C50.42361 (7)0.07927 (7)0.06891 (5)0.01135 (18)
C60.44904 (8)0.08027 (7)0.13472 (5)0.01223 (18)
H6A0.40550.03990.15770.015*
H6B0.51560.05900.14080.015*
C70.33453 (7)0.20455 (8)0.15563 (5)0.01188 (19)
H7A0.31640.22200.19710.014*
H7B0.29510.15130.14390.014*
C80.31295 (8)0.28378 (8)0.11346 (5)0.01202 (18)
C90.49132 (7)0.19846 (8)0.21257 (5)0.01084 (18)
H9A0.55510.16780.21020.013*
C100.44229 (8)0.16490 (8)0.27004 (5)0.0154 (2)
H10A0.43990.09720.27000.019*
H10B0.37580.18820.27140.019*
C110.49688 (8)0.19815 (10)0.32563 (5)0.0182 (2)
H11A0.46370.17720.36250.022*
H11B0.56210.17180.32560.022*
P10.30339 (3)0.50000.25000.01160 (8)
F10.41712 (9)0.50000.25000.0503 (5)
F20.19013 (9)0.50000.25000.0417 (4)
F30.30336 (11)0.49194 (7)0.32124 (4)0.0470 (3)
F40.30308 (5)0.60985 (5)0.25526 (4)0.01831 (15)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Co10.00914 (10)0.00719 (10)0.00650 (10)−0.00083 (6)0.0000.000
N10.0118 (4)0.0103 (4)0.0099 (4)−0.0015 (3)−0.0002 (3)−0.0010 (3)
N20.0103 (4)0.0095 (4)0.0081 (4)−0.0005 (3)0.0000 (3)0.0010 (3)
O10.0113 (3)0.0106 (3)0.0130 (3)0.0008 (3)−0.0004 (3)0.0018 (3)
O20.0119 (4)0.0223 (4)0.0241 (4)0.0033 (3)−0.0017 (3)0.0040 (3)
C10.0140 (4)0.0167 (5)0.0095 (4)−0.0025 (4)0.0000 (3)−0.0006 (3)
C20.0133 (5)0.0222 (5)0.0123 (4)−0.0031 (4)0.0001 (4)−0.0053 (4)
C30.0117 (4)0.0167 (5)0.0198 (5)−0.0014 (4)0.0007 (4)−0.0087 (4)
C40.0129 (4)0.0105 (4)0.0200 (5)−0.0008 (3)0.0003 (4)−0.0036 (4)
C50.0111 (4)0.0100 (4)0.0129 (4)−0.0007 (3)0.0004 (3)−0.0008 (3)
C60.0156 (4)0.0087 (4)0.0124 (4)−0.0011 (3)−0.0010 (4)0.0014 (3)
C70.0095 (4)0.0143 (5)0.0118 (4)−0.0003 (3)0.0000 (3)0.0026 (3)
C80.0125 (4)0.0125 (4)0.0111 (4)0.0001 (4)−0.0010 (3)−0.0002 (3)
C90.0115 (4)0.0133 (5)0.0077 (4)−0.0004 (3)−0.0007 (3)0.0013 (3)
C100.0163 (5)0.0208 (5)0.0092 (4)−0.0020 (4)0.0011 (4)0.0037 (4)
C110.0182 (5)0.0277 (6)0.0087 (4)0.0011 (4)−0.0006 (4)0.0031 (4)
P10.01124 (17)0.01151 (17)0.01203 (17)0.0000.0000.00031 (13)
F10.0127 (5)0.0204 (6)0.1178 (16)0.0000.000−0.0134 (8)
F20.0128 (5)0.0206 (6)0.0916 (13)0.0000.000−0.0056 (7)
F30.1008 (10)0.0246 (5)0.0157 (4)0.0046 (5)−0.0073 (5)−0.0001 (3)
F40.0176 (3)0.0116 (3)0.0258 (4)0.0001 (2)−0.0029 (3)−0.0010 (3)
Co1—O1i1.8869 (8)C5—C61.5050 (15)
Co1—O11.8869 (8)C6—H6A0.9900
Co1—N11.9548 (9)C6—H6B0.9900
Co1—N1i1.9548 (9)C7—C81.5201 (15)
Co1—N21.9448 (9)C7—H7A0.9900
Co1—N2i1.9449 (9)C7—H7B0.9900
N1—C11.3448 (14)C9—C9i1.527 (2)
N1—C51.3567 (14)C9—C101.5300 (15)
N2—C61.4951 (14)C9—H9A1.0000
N2—C71.5073 (14)C10—C111.5312 (16)
N2—C91.5130 (13)C10—H10A0.9900
O1—C81.3029 (13)C10—H10B0.9900
O2—C81.2212 (14)C11—C11i1.519 (3)
C1—C21.3898 (15)C11—H11A0.9900
C1—H1A0.9500C11—H11B0.9900
C2—C31.3882 (17)P1—F21.5840 (13)
C2—H2A0.9500P1—F31.5872 (9)
C3—C41.3949 (17)P1—F3ii1.5873 (9)
C3—H3A0.9500P1—F11.5905 (14)
C4—C51.3873 (15)P1—F41.6106 (7)
C4—H4A0.9500P1—F4ii1.6106 (7)
O1i—Co1—O1176.08 (5)C5—C6—H6B110.5
O1i—Co1—N294.95 (4)H6A—C6—H6B108.7
O1—Co1—N287.84 (4)N2—C7—C8112.65 (8)
O1i—Co1—N2i87.84 (4)N2—C7—H7A109.1
O1—Co1—N2i94.95 (4)C8—C7—H7A109.1
N2—Co1—N2i89.33 (5)N2—C7—H7B109.1
O1i—Co1—N187.75 (4)C8—C7—H7B109.1
O1—Co1—N189.92 (4)H7A—C7—H7B107.8
N2—Co1—N182.17 (4)O2—C8—O1124.95 (10)
N2i—Co1—N1170.04 (4)O2—C8—C7120.39 (10)
O1i—Co1—N1i89.92 (4)O1—C8—C7114.65 (9)
O1—Co1—N1i87.75 (4)N2—C9—C9i106.21 (7)
N2—Co1—N1i170.04 (4)N2—C9—C10115.07 (9)
N2i—Co1—N1i82.17 (4)C9i—C9—C10112.82 (7)
N1—Co1—N1i106.74 (5)N2—C9—H9A107.5
C1—N1—C5119.30 (9)C9i—C9—H9A107.5
C1—N1—Co1128.67 (8)C10—C9—H9A107.5
C5—N1—Co1112.01 (7)C9—C10—C11110.36 (9)
C6—N2—C7110.46 (8)C9—C10—H10A109.6
C6—N2—C9113.49 (8)C11—C10—H10A109.6
C7—N2—C9114.01 (8)C9—C10—H10B109.6
C6—N2—Co1105.23 (6)C11—C10—H10B109.6
C7—N2—Co1106.93 (6)H10A—C10—H10B108.1
C9—N2—Co1106.01 (6)C11i—C11—C10110.22 (9)
C8—O1—Co1114.57 (7)C11i—C11—H11A109.6
N1—C1—C2121.54 (10)C10—C11—H11A109.6
N1—C1—H1A119.2C11i—C11—H11B109.6
C2—C1—H1A119.2C10—C11—H11B109.6
C3—C2—C1119.32 (10)H11A—C11—H11B108.1
C3—C2—H2A120.3F2—P1—F389.98 (6)
C1—C2—H2A120.3F2—P1—F3ii89.98 (6)
C2—C3—C4119.11 (10)F3—P1—F3ii179.97 (11)
C2—C3—H3A120.4F2—P1—F1180.0
C4—C3—H3A120.4F3—P1—F190.02 (6)
C5—C4—C3118.70 (11)F3ii—P1—F190.02 (6)
C5—C4—H4A120.6F2—P1—F489.84 (3)
C3—C4—H4A120.6F3—P1—F490.09 (5)
N1—C5—C4121.85 (10)F3ii—P1—F489.91 (5)
N1—C5—C6114.31 (9)F1—P1—F490.16 (3)
C4—C5—C6123.80 (10)F2—P1—F4ii89.84 (3)
N2—C6—C5106.01 (8)F3—P1—F4ii89.91 (5)
N2—C6—H6A110.5F3ii—P1—F4ii90.09 (5)
C5—C6—H6A110.5F1—P1—F4ii90.16 (3)
N2—C6—H6B110.5F4—P1—F4ii179.69 (6)
N2—Co1—O1—C8−17.97 (8)N1—C5—C6—N227.33 (12)
N2i—Co1—O1—C8−107.11 (8)C4—C5—C6—N2−150.39 (10)
N1—Co1—O1—C864.20 (8)C6—N2—C7—C8−119.41 (9)
N1i—Co1—O1—C8170.96 (8)C9—N2—C7—C8111.40 (10)
C5—N1—C1—C2−4.46 (16)Co1—N2—C7—C8−5.42 (10)
Co1—N1—C1—C2177.37 (8)Co1—O1—C8—O2−162.99 (10)
N1—C1—C2—C31.77 (17)Co1—O1—C8—C718.41 (12)
C1—C2—C3—C41.97 (17)N2—C7—C8—O2173.28 (10)
C2—C3—C4—C5−2.94 (16)N2—C7—C8—O1−8.05 (13)
C1—N1—C5—C43.43 (16)C6—N2—C9—C9i156.93 (9)
Co1—N1—C5—C4−178.11 (8)C7—N2—C9—C9i−75.42 (11)
C1—N1—C5—C6−174.34 (9)Co1—N2—C9—C9i41.93 (10)
Co1—N1—C5—C64.12 (11)C6—N2—C9—C10−77.49 (11)
C3—C4—C5—N10.28 (16)C7—N2—C9—C1050.16 (12)
C3—C4—C5—C6177.83 (10)Co1—N2—C9—C10167.51 (8)
C7—N2—C6—C569.87 (10)N2—C9—C10—C11−174.45 (9)
C9—N2—C6—C5−160.66 (8)C9i—C9—C10—C11−52.36 (14)
Co1—N2—C6—C5−45.20 (9)C9—C10—C11—C11i58.00 (14)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C1—H1A···O2iii0.952.843.4475 (15)122
C2—H2A···F3iv0.952.513.2928 (15)139
C4—H4A···O2v0.952.703.5907 (15)157
C6—H6A···F2vi0.992.523.4243 (13)152
C6—H6B···F1vii0.992.743.3824 (13)123
C6—H6B···F3vii0.992.843.8229 (18)170
C7—H7A···F4ii0.992.683.3879 (13)128
C7—H7A···F4v0.992.673.2436 (13)117
C7—H7B···F3vi0.992.623.4982 (16)147
C9—H9A···F1vii1.002.643.2790 (12)122
C9—H9A···F4vii1.002.293.2336 (13)157
C10—H10A···F1vii0.992.493.1429 (15)123
C10—H10A···F2vi0.992.353.0728 (14)129
C10—H10B···F4v0.992.773.5399 (14)135
  7 in total

1.  Cationic Lanthanide Complexes of N,N'-Bis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic Acid (H(2)bped).

Authors:  P. Caravan; Parisa Mehrkhodavandi; Chris Orvig
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  1997-03-26       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  Effect of Pyridyl Donors in the Chelation of Aluminum(III), Gallium(III), and Indium(III).

Authors:  P. Caravan; Steven J. Rettig; Chris Orvig
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  1997-03-26       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Comparison of two tetrapodal N,O ligands: impact of the softness of the heterocyclic N-donors pyridine and pyrazine on the selectivity for Am(III) over Eu(III).

Authors:  Marie Heitzmann; Florence Bravard; Christelle Gateau; Nathalie Boubals; Claude Berthon; Jacques Pécaut; Marie-Christine Charbonnel; Pascale Delangle
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  Metal ion complexes of N,N'-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-1,3-diaminopropane-N,N'-diacetic acid, H2bppd.

Authors:  Daniel S Kissel; Jan Florián; Craig C McLauchlan; Albert W Herlinger
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.165

6.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  {2,2'-[N,N'-Bis(pyridin-2-ylmeth-yl)propane-1,3-diyldi(nitrilo)]di-acetato}-cobalt(III) hexa-fluoridophosphate aceto-nitrile 0.064-solvate.

Authors:  Craig C McLauchlan; Daniel S Kissel; William R Arnold; Albert W Herlinger
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-04-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.