Literature DB >> 26028293

Cartilage immunoprivilege depends on donor source and lesion location.

B Arzi1, G D DuRaine2, C A Lee3, D J Huey2, D L Borjesson4, B G Murphy4, J C Y Hu2, N Baumgarth5, K A Athanasiou6.   

Abstract

The ability to repair damaged cartilage is a major goal of musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Allogeneic (same species, different individual) or xenogeneic (different species) sources can provide an attractive source of chondrocytes for cartilage tissue engineering, since autologous (same individual) cells are scarce. Immune rejection of non-autologous hyaline articular cartilage has seldom been considered due to the popular notion of "cartilage immunoprivilege". The objective of this study was to determine the suitability of allogeneic and xenogeneic engineered neocartilage tissue for cartilage repair. To address this, scaffold-free tissue engineered articular cartilage of syngeneic (same genetic background), allogeneic, and xenogeneic origin were implanted into two different locations of the rabbit knee (n=3 per group/location). Xenogeneic engineered cartilage and control xenogeneic chondral explants provoked profound innate inflammatory and adaptive cellular responses, regardless of transplant location. Cytological quantification of immune cells showed that, while allogeneic neocartilage elicited an immune response in the patella, negligible responses were observed when implanted into the trochlea; instead the responses were comparable to microfracture-treated empty defect controls. Allogeneic neocartilage survived within the trochlea implant site and demonstrated graft integration into the underlying bone. In conclusion, the knee joint cartilage does not represent an immune privileged site, strongly rejecting xenogeneic but not allogeneic chondrocytes in a location-dependent fashion. This difference in location-dependent survival of allogeneic tissue may be associated with proximity to the synovium. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Through a series of in vivo studies this research demonstrates that articular cartilage is not fully immunoprivileged. In addition, we now show that anatomical location of the defect, even within the same joint compartment, strongly influences the degree of the resultant immune response. This is one of the first investigations to show that (1) immune tolerance to allogeneic tissue engineered cartilage and (2) subsequent implant survival are dependent on the implant location and proximity to the synovium.
Copyright © 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage defect; Immune privilege; Immunogenicity; Self-assembling process; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26028293      PMCID: PMC4522233          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  54 in total

1.  Cell-mediated and humoral immune responses to cartilage antigenic components.

Authors:  T Glant; E Hadas; M Nagy
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 2.  Effector mechanisms in transplant rejection.

Authors:  Paulo N Rocha; Troy J Plumb; Steven D Crowley; Thomas M Coffman
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.988

3.  Destruction of joint homografts. An experimental study.

Authors:  I G Yablon; K D Brandt; R Delellis; D Covall
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Immune responses to osteochondral allografts. Current knowledge and future directions.

Authors:  G E Friedlaender
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The immunogenicity of allograft knee joint transplants.

Authors:  F Langer; A E Gross; M West; E P Urovitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments.

Authors:  V C Mow; S C Kuei; W M Lai; C G Armstrong
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Xeno-implantation of pig chondrocytes into rabbit to treat localized articular cartilage defects: an animal model.

Authors:  Manuel Ramallal; Emilia Maneiro; Eduardo López; Isaac Fuentes-Boquete; María J López-Armada; José L Fernández-Sueiro; Fausto Galdo; Francisco J De Toro; Francisco J Blanco
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 8.  Success rates and immunologic responses of autogenic, allogenic, and xenogenic treatments to repair articular cartilage defects.

Authors:  Christopher M Revell; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.389

9.  Inducing articular cartilage phenotype in costochondral cells.

Authors:  Meghan K Murphy; Grayson D DuRaine; A Reddi; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Immunogenicity of xenogeneic cartilage matrix components in a rabbit model.

Authors:  G E Friedlaender; I M Ladenbauer-Bellis; O D Chrisman
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1983 May-Jun
View more
  24 in total

1.  In Vitro Analysis of the Differentiation Capacity of Postmortally Isolated Human Chondrocytes Influenced by Different Growth Factors and Oxygen Levels.

Authors:  Anika Jonitz-Heincke; Annett Klinder; Diana Boy; Achim Salamon; Doris Hansmann; Juliane Pasold; Andreas Buettner; Rainer Bader
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Quality of Cartilage Repair from Marrow Stimulation Correlates with Cell Number, Clonogenic, Chondrogenic, and Matrix Production Potential of Underlying Bone Marrow Stromal Cells in a Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Garima Dwivedi; Anik Chevrier; Mohamad-Gabriel Alameh; Caroline D Hoemann; Michael D Buschmann
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  The Self-Assembling Process and Applications in Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jennifer K Lee; Jarrett M Link; Jerry C Y Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 4.  Surgical and tissue engineering strategies for articular cartilage and meniscus repair.

Authors:  Heenam Kwon; Wendy E Brown; Cassandra A Lee; Dean Wang; Nikolaos Paschos; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 5.  Cell-based tissue engineering strategies used in the clinical repair of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Brian J Huang; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Functionality of decellularized matrix in cartilage regeneration: A comparison of tissue versus cell sources.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Lianqi Yan; Song Chen; Ming Pei
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 7.  Systematic review on the application of 3D-bioprinting technology in orthoregeneration: current achievements and open challenges.

Authors:  Rachel L Pan; Kari Martyniak; Makan Karimzadeh; David G Gelikman; Jonathan DeVries; Kelly Sutter; Melanie Coathup; Mehdi Razavi; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Thomas J Kean
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-09-19

8.  In Vivo Bioreactor Using Cellulose Membrane Benefit Engineering Cartilage by Improving the Chondrogenesis and Modulating the Immune Response.

Authors:  Xue Guang Li; In-Su Park; Byung Hyune Choi; Ung-Jin Kim; Byoung-Hyun Min
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.169

9.  The Effect of Neonatal, Juvenile, and Adult Donors on Rejuvenated Neocartilage Functional Properties.

Authors:  Ryan P Donahue; Rachel C Nordberg; Benjamin J Bielajew; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.080

10.  Human Articular Chondrocytes Regulate Immune Response by Affecting Directly T Cell Proliferation and Indirectly Inhibiting Monocyte Differentiation to Professional Antigen-Presenting Cells.

Authors:  Rui C Pereira; Daniela Martinelli; Ranieri Cancedda; Chiara Gentili; Alessandro Poggi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.