Literature DB >> 6339143

Immune responses to osteochondral allografts. Current knowledge and future directions.

G E Friedlaender.   

Abstract

Immune responses directed against osteochondral allograft-associated immunogens have been demonstrated in a variety of animals models and, to a more limited degree, in human recipients. The most extensively studied, and presumably the most potent source of sensitization, are cell-surface transplantations found on the heterogeneous cell types ubiquitous to skeletal tissues. By virtually all criteria used for evaluation, the immunogenicity resulting from histocompatibility antigens is reduced by deep-freezing the allograft prior to implantation, and responses are diminished even further when tissues are freeze-dried. There is preliminary evidence to suggest that matrix components, particularly proteoglycan subunits, are also capable of sensitizing osteochondral graft recipients. The magnitude and significance of these immunogens are matters of speculation. Collagen may also act as an osteochondral allograft immunogen. The significance of osteochondral allograft immunogenicity, as compared with biomechanical factors in the incorporation of a bone graft, has not yet been elucidated. The effect of immune responses on clinical allograft success, if it is as important as it appears, should profoundly influence future osteochondral allograft research in reconstructive joint surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6339143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  25 in total

Review 1.  Adverse reactions and events related to musculoskeletal allografts: reviewed by the World Health Organisation Project NOTIFY.

Authors:  M Hinsenkamp; L Muylle; T Eastlund; D Fehily; L Noël; D M Strong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparative materials differences revealed in engineered bone as a function of cell-specific differentiation.

Authors:  Eileen Gentleman; Robin J Swain; Nicholas D Evans; Suwimon Boonrungsiman; Gavin Jell; Michael D Ball; Tamaryn A V Shean; Michelle L Oyen; Alexandra Porter; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  [In vitro trials with single and co-cultures of osteoblasts and endothelial cells : evaluation of new biomaterials for bone reconstruction and regeneration].

Authors:  R E Unger; S Halstenberg; H Günther; A Sartoris; C Brochhausen; C J Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Bone transplantation.

Authors:  L Schweiberer; H Stützle; H K Mandelkow
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Use of demineralized bone matrix in the extremities.

Authors:  Georgios I Drosos; Panagiotis Touzopoulos; Athanasios Ververidis; Konstantinos Tilkeridis; Konstantinos Kazakos
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

6.  [Massive reconstruction of acetabulum and proximal femur].

Authors:  D G Poitout; P Tropiano; M Bernat; J F Moulene
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-10

7.  [Treatment of tibial pseudoarthrosis. Complications after intramedullary, allogeneic fibular grafting].

Authors:  T Helfen; W C Prall; W Mutschler; P H Thaller
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Segmental bone grafting. Comparison of different types of graft in dogs.

Authors:  M Aebi; P Regazzoni; O Schwarzenbach
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  [Alloplasty or transplantation in bone, cartilage and joint reconstruction].

Authors:  O Trentz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1987

10.  Increased bone ingrowth distance into lipid-extracted bank bone at 6 weeks. A titanium chamber study in allogeneic and syngeneic rats.

Authors:  K Thorén; P Aspenberg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.