Vanette E J McLennan1, Jennifer H M Boddy1, Michelle G Daly2, Lesley M Chenoweth1. 1. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia. Email. 2. School of Human Services and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Parklands Drive, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia. Email.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This paper reports on the experiences and perspectives of community members in relation to advance healthcare directives and enduring power of attorney, including the factors that encourage or discourage engagement in advance care planning (ACP). METHODS; A qualitative methodology was used involving 26 in-depth telephone interviews with community members (mean age 66 years). The aims of the interview question were to gain an understanding of: (1) motivations for engaging in ACP; (2) barriers that prevent people from engaging in ACP; and (3) suggestions for promoting ACP. RESULTS: The findings suggest that: (1) community members lack knowledge about ACP; (2) forms appear inaccessible and complex; (3) community members avoid ACP due to fear, mistrust and concerns over control; and (4) there are misperceptions regarding the relevance of ACP based on age and health. CONCLUSIONS: There is unnecessary fear, avoidance and mistrust around ACP activities, largely resulting from misinformation. There is an undoubted need for greater education and support to be offered to individuals and their families regarding ACP, its benefits and its limitations.
OBJECTIVE: This paper reports on the experiences and perspectives of community members in relation to advance healthcare directives and enduring power of attorney, including the factors that encourage or discourage engagement in advance care planning (ACP). METHODS; A qualitative methodology was used involving 26 in-depth telephone interviews with community members (mean age 66 years). The aims of the interview question were to gain an understanding of: (1) motivations for engaging in ACP; (2) barriers that prevent people from engaging in ACP; and (3) suggestions for promoting ACP. RESULTS: The findings suggest that: (1) community members lack knowledge about ACP; (2) forms appear inaccessible and complex; (3) community members avoid ACP due to fear, mistrust and concerns over control; and (4) there are misperceptions regarding the relevance of ACP based on age and health. CONCLUSIONS: There is unnecessary fear, avoidance and mistrust around ACP activities, largely resulting from misinformation. There is an undoubted need for greater education and support to be offered to individuals and their families regarding ACP, its benefits and its limitations.
Authors: Michael K Y Wong; Maria Cassandre Medor; Katerina Yelle Labre; Mengzhu Jiang; Jason R Frank; Lisa M Fischer; Warren J Cheung Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2019-09-16
Authors: Hilary Miller; Janice Tan; Josephine M Clayton; Anne Meller; Oshana Hermiz; Nicholas Zwar; Joel Rhee Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Linda H Phung; Deborah E Barnes; Aiesha M Volow; Brookelle H Li; Nikita R Shirsat; Rebecca L Sudore Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 7.538