Literature DB >> 26026865

Predictors of Access Site Crossover in Patients Who Underwent Transradial Coronary Angiography.

Jeffrey Le1, Sripal Bangalore1, Yu Guo2, Sohah N Iqbal1, Jinfeng Xu2, Louis H Miller1, John Coppola1, Binita Shah3.   

Abstract

Despite increasing use of the transradial approach (TRA) for coronary angiography, TRA failure and subsequent access site crossover remain a barrier to TRA adoption. The aim of this study was to elucidate patient and procedural characteristics associated with TRA to transfemoral approach (TFA) crossover and examine TRA to TFA crossover by operator experience over time. This retrospective analysis identified 1,600 patients who underwent coronary angiography with possible percutaneous coronary intervention through TRA by operators with varied TRA experience in an urban tertiary care center from October 2010 to August 2013. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify independent predictors of access site crossover, from TRA to TFA, and strength of association is presented as odds ratio (OR, 95% confidence interval [CI]). Access site crossover was noted in 166 patients (10.4%). Multivariable predictors of access site crossover included age >75 years (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.91, p = 0.004) and operator experience (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.96 to 4.52, p <0.0001). Less experienced operators (≤5 years TRA experience) had a decrease in access site crossover over time (quartile 1: 8.9%, quartile 2: 18.8%, quartile 3: 16.4%, and quartile 4: 8.6%, p <0.001), which paralleled an increase in the proportion of procedures using initial TRA over time (quartile 1: 38.0%, quartile 2: 53.7%, quartile 3: 54.8%, and quartile 4: 70.3%, p <0.001). Experienced operators (>5 years TRA experience) had no significant change in proportion of access site crossover over time (quartile 1: 2.8%, quartile 2: 6.4%, quartile 3: 5.6%, quartile 4: 5.8%, p = 0.54). In conclusion, rate of access site crossover in the contemporary era is relatively low and can be mitigated with operator experience. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26026865      PMCID: PMC4499487          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.04.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  22 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Dominique Joyal; Olivier F Bertrand; Stéphane Rinfret; Avi Shimony; Mark J Eisenberg
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Adoption of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes according to center radial volume in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare system: insights from the Veterans Affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking (CART) program.

Authors:  Antonio Gutierrez; Thomas T Tsai; Maggie A Stanislawski; Mladen Vidovich; Christopher L Bryson; Deepak L Bhatt; Gary K Grunwald; John Rumsfeld; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 6.546

3.  Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions.

Authors:  Warren T Ball; Waseem Sharieff; Sanjit S Jolly; Tony Hong; Michael J B Kutryk; John J Graham; Neil P Fam; Robert J Chisholm; Asim N Cheema
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  Routine use of the transradial approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: procedural aspects and outcomes in 2209 patients treated in a single high-volume centre.

Authors:  Maarten A Vink; Giovanni Amoroso; Maurits T Dirksen; Rene J van der Schaaf; Mark S Patterson; Jan G P Tijssen; Ferdinand Kiemeneij; Ton Slagboom
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Transradial versus transfemoral intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a propensity score-adjusted and -matched analysis from the REAL (REgistro regionale AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia-Romagna) multicenter registry.

Authors:  Marco Valgimigli; Francesco Saia; Paolo Guastaroba; Alberto Menozzi; Paolo Magnavacchi; Andrea Santarelli; Francesco Passerini; Pietro Sangiorgio; Antonio Manari; Fabio Tarantino; Massimo Margheri; Alberto Benassi; Massimo Giuseppe Sangiorgi; Stefano Tondi; Antonio Marzocchi
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 6.  Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Olivier F Bertrand; Patrick Bélisle; Dominique Joyal; Olivier Costerousse; Sunil V Rao; Sanjit S Jolly; David Meerkin; Lawrence Joseph
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study.

Authors:  Ted S Lo; Karim Ratib; Aun-Yeong Chong; Gurbir Bhatia; Mark Gunning; James Nolan
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention.

Authors:  Sanjit S Jolly; John Cairns; Salim Yusuf; Kari Niemela; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Matthew Worthley; Emile Ferrari; Warren J Cantor; Anthony Fung; Nicholas Valettas; Michael Rokoss; Goran K Olivecrona; Petr Widimsky; Asim N Cheema; Peggy Gao; Shamir R Mehta
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).

Authors:  Dmitriy N Feldman; Rajesh V Swaminathan; Lisa A Kaltenbach; Dmitri V Baklanov; Luke K Kim; S Chiu Wong; Robert M Minutello; John C Messenger; Issam Moussa; Kirk N Garratt; Robert N Piana; William B Hillegass; Mauricio G Cohen; Ian C Gilchrist; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study.

Authors:  Enrico Romagnoli; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Alessandro Sciahbasi; Luigi Politi; Stefano Rigattieri; Gianluca Pendenza; Francesco Summaria; Roberto Patrizi; Ambra Borghi; Cristian Di Russo; Claudio Moretti; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Paolo Loschiavo; Ernesto Lioy; Imad Sheiban; Giuseppe Sangiorgi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of Left Versus Right Radial Artery Approach for Coronary Angiography on Radiation Parameters in Patients With Predictors of Transradial Access Failure.

Authors:  Binita Shah; Joseph Burdowski; Yu Guo; Bryan Velez de Villa; Andrew Huynh; Meena Farid; Mansi Maini; Claudia Serrano-Gomez; Cezar Staniloae; Frederick Feit; Michael J Attubato; James Slater; John Coppola
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Transradial Artery Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Matthew S Schoenfeld; Ibrahim Kassas; Binita Shah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-24

3.  Predictors of Universal Catheter Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Rebecca Liebenthal; Scott Butler; John Coppola; Binita Shah
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 2.022

4.  Safety and efficacy of transradial coronary angiography and intervention in patients older than 80 years: from the Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry.

Authors:  Hoyoun Won; Wang Soo Lee; Sang-Wook Kim; Byung Ryul Cho; Young Jin Youn; Young-Hyo Lim; Min-Ho Lee; Jae-Hwan Lee; Seung-Woon Rha
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.