Literature DB >> 26025881

Efficient cryopreservation of mouse embryos by modified droplet vitrification (MDV).

Liyou An1, Shiwei Chang1, Yeshu Hu1, Yi Li1, Bowen Xu2, Fenli Zhang1, Lan Yang2, Giorgio Antonio Presicce3, Fuliang Du4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess modified droplet vitrification (MDV) for the cryopreservation of early developmental mouse embryos. Mouse embryos were equilibrated in holding solution for 3 min followed by immersion in vitrification solution for 30-45 s, and then three embryos per 3-μL vitrification droplet were directly dropped into liquid nitrogen. Vitrified embryos were warmed to examine their developmental potential both in vitro and in vivo. The results demonstrated that MDV vitrified and warmed embryos had a survival rate of 98.1-99.6% (P>0.05); however, blastocyst development post warming and culture in vitro demonstrated that vitrified 4-celled, 8-celled, 16-celled, morulae, and blastocyst embryos had significant higher developmental potentials (94.7-99.5%) than those from zygotes (9.2%) and 2-celled embryos (85.7%) (P<0.05). Compared to CryoLoop and CryoTech vitrification, MDV showed similar results with regards to rates of survival, blastocyst development, but with the higher hatching rate (76.1% vs. 64.0-67.3%) (P<0.05). Cryopreservation by MDV resulted in a similar blastocyst developmental potential in 4-celled and 16 celled embryos from ICR (94.7-99.5%), C57BL/6J (94.7-96.4%), and their crossbred F1 strain (97.9-98.9%) (P>0.05). After embryo transfer of vitrified ICR embryos from 4-celled, 16-celled, morulae and blastocyst stage, 40.7-43.7% of the embryos developed into live offspring (P>0.05), but MDV vitrification resulted in the highest birth rate (43.8%) compared to CryoLoop (38.3%) and CryoTech (35.4%) (P<0.05), when 4-celled mouse embryos were used for vitrification. Our study clearly demonstrated that MDV is the most efficient vitrification to cryopreserve embryos at least 4-celled and advanced stages, which can be used to preserve important mouse genomes from different strains and different developmental stages.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth rate; CryoLoop; CryoTech; Cryopreservation; Developmental potential; Embryo transfer; Embryos; Modified droplet vitrification; Mouse

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26025881     DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.05.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryobiology        ISSN: 0011-2240            Impact factor:   2.487


  6 in total

Review 1.  Advanced technologies for the preservation of mammalian biospecimens.

Authors:  Haishui Huang; Xiaoming He; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 29.234

2.  Significant heparin effect on bovine embryo development during sexed in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Li-You An; Sanjeev A Chaubal; Yanhong Liu; Yexiang Chen; Tshimangadzo L Nedambale; Jie Xu; Fei Xue; Juan F Moreno; Shenghong Tao; Giorgio Antonio Presicce; Fuliang DU
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Efficient generation of FVII gene knockout mice using CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease and truncated guided RNAs.

Authors:  Liyou An; Yeshu Hu; Shiwei Chang; Xiumei Zhu; Pingping Ling; Fenli Zhang; Jiao Liu; Yanhong Liu; Yexiang Chen; Lan Yang; Giorgio Antonio Presicce; Fuliang Du
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Microtissues in Cardiovascular Medicine: Regenerative Potential Based on a 3D Microenvironment.

Authors:  Julia Günter; Petra Wolint; Annina Bopp; Julia Steiger; Elena Cambria; Simon P Hoerstrup; Maximilian Y Emmert
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.443

5.  Efficient vitrification of mouse embryos using the Kitasato Vitrification System as a novel vitrification device.

Authors:  Kenji Momozawa; Atsushi Matsuzawa; Yukio Tokunaga; Shiori Abe; Yumi Koyanagi; Miho Kurita; Marina Nakano; Takao Miyake
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Negative regulation of NEMO signaling by the ubiquitin E3 ligase MARCH2.

Authors:  Kiramage Chathuranga; Tae-Hwan Kim; Hyuncheol Lee; Jun-Seol Park; Jae-Hoon Kim; Wijesinghe A Gayan Chathuranga; Pathum Ekanayaka; Youn Jung Choi; Chul-Ho Lee; Chul-Joong Kim; Jae U Jung; Jong-Soo Lee
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.