Müjgan Ercan1, Emiş Deniz Akbulut2, Sedat Abuşoğlu3, Fatma Meriç Yılmaz4, Esra Fırat Oğuz5, Canan Topçuoğlu5, Volkan Öztekin6, Nihal Boğdaycıoğlu5. 1. Department of Biochemistry, Public Health Laboratory, Aydın, Turkey. 2. Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research Hospital, Clinical Biochemistry, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Selçuk University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Konya, Turkey. 4. Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Clinical Biochemistry, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: fatmamericyilmaz@hotmail.com. 5. Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Clinical Biochemistry, Ankara, Turkey. 6. Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Clinic of Urology, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Laboratories determine the most appropriate approach for the collection and transport of urine specimens. We investigated the effect of a chlorhexidine-based preservative tube on sample stability, compared the results of refrigerated polystyrene tubes with no additives, and investigated the effect of temperature on the performance of preservative tubes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Fresh urine specimen (n=48) aliquots in BD Vacutainer® Plus Urinalysis Preservative Tubes and polystyrene tubes were analyzed on an Iris Diagnostics iQ200. Samples in polystyrene tubes were refrigerated for 4 and 8h. Four aliquots in preservative tubes were kept at room temperature for 4, 8, 24, and 72h, while two aliquots were kept on ice for 4 and 8h. RESULTS: There was good agreement for all chemistry and microscopy parameters with the exceptions of white blood cells (WBCs) at 24 and 72h and red blood cells (RBCs) at 72h. Preservative tubes on ice showed a significant decrease in concordance of WBCs and calcium oxalate (CaOx) parameters compared with the results at room temperature. Results of refrigerated polystyrene tubes showed good agreement with the exceptions of WBC clumps and amorphous crystal at 8h. CONCLUSIONS: A chlorhexidine-containing preservative tube seems advantageous for urine sample transport from outside healthcare services. A preservative tube offers comparable results with urine samples kept in a refrigerator for 4-8h for the majority of parameters. Keeping samples at room temperature is recommended when preservative tubes are used because ice produces a negative effect on WBCs and CaOx.
OBJECTIVES: Laboratories determine the most appropriate approach for the collection and transport of urine specimens. We investigated the effect of a chlorhexidine-based preservative tube on sample stability, compared the results of refrigerated polystyrene tubes with no additives, and investigated the effect of temperature on the performance of preservative tubes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Fresh urine specimen (n=48) aliquots in BD Vacutainer® Plus Urinalysis Preservative Tubes and polystyrene tubes were analyzed on an Iris Diagnostics iQ200. Samples in polystyrene tubes were refrigerated for 4 and 8h. Four aliquots in preservative tubes were kept at room temperature for 4, 8, 24, and 72h, while two aliquots were kept on ice for 4 and 8h. RESULTS: There was good agreement for all chemistry and microscopy parameters with the exceptions of white blood cells (WBCs) at 24 and 72h and red blood cells (RBCs) at 72h. Preservative tubes on ice showed a significant decrease in concordance of WBCs and calcium oxalate (CaOx) parameters compared with the results at room temperature. Results of refrigerated polystyrene tubes showed good agreement with the exceptions of WBC clumps and amorphous crystal at 8h. CONCLUSIONS: A chlorhexidine-containing preservative tube seems advantageous for urine sample transport from outside healthcare services. A preservative tube offers comparable results with urine samples kept in a refrigerator for 4-8h for the majority of parameters. Keeping samples at room temperature is recommended when preservative tubes are used because ice produces a negative effect on WBCs and CaOx.
Authors: Anca Bacârea; Gyula László Fekete; Bianca Liana Grigorescu; Vladimir Constantin Bacârea Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 2.447