Tamara J Somers1, Amy P Abernethy2, Sara N Edmond1, Sarah A Kelleher3, Anava A Wren1, Greg P Samsa4, Francis J Keefe1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 2. Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: sarah.kelleher@duke.edu. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformation, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Pain coping skills training (PCST) interventions have shown efficacy for reducing pain and providing other benefits in patients with cancer. However, their reach is often limited because of a variety of barriers (e.g., travel, physical burden, cost, time). OBJECTIVES: This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a brief PCST intervention delivered to patients in their homes using mobile health (mHealth) technology. Pre-to-post intervention changes in pain, physical functioning, physical symptoms, psychological distress, self-efficacy for pain management, and pain catastrophizing also were examined. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of breast, lung, prostate, or colorectal cancer who reported persistent pain (N = 25) participated in a four-session intervention delivered using mHealth technology (videoconferencing on a tablet computer). Participants completed measures of pain, physical functioning, physical symptoms, psychological distress, self-efficacy for pain management, and pain catastrophizing. We also assessed patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Participants completed an average of 3.36 (SD = 1.11) of the four intervention sessions for an overall session completion rate of 84%. Participants reported that the program was of excellent quality and met their needs. Significant preintervention to postintervention differences were found in pain, physical symptoms, psychological distress, and pain catastrophizing. CONCLUSION: The use of mHealth technology is a feasible and acceptable option for delivery of PCST for patients with cancer. This delivery mode is likely to dramatically increase intervention access for cancer patients with pain compared to traditional in-person delivery. Preliminary data also suggest that the program is likely to produce pretreatment to post-treatment decreases in pain and other important outcomes.
CONTEXT: Pain coping skills training (PCST) interventions have shown efficacy for reducing pain and providing other benefits in patients with cancer. However, their reach is often limited because of a variety of barriers (e.g., travel, physical burden, cost, time). OBJECTIVES: This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a brief PCST intervention delivered to patients in their homes using mobile health (mHealth) technology. Pre-to-post intervention changes in pain, physical functioning, physical symptoms, psychological distress, self-efficacy for pain management, and pain catastrophizing also were examined. METHODS:Patients with a diagnosis of breast, lung, prostate, or colorectal cancer who reported persistent pain (N = 25) participated in a four-session intervention delivered using mHealth technology (videoconferencing on a tablet computer). Participants completed measures of pain, physical functioning, physical symptoms, psychological distress, self-efficacy for pain management, and pain catastrophizing. We also assessed patient satisfaction. RESULTS:Participants completed an average of 3.36 (SD = 1.11) of the four intervention sessions for an overall session completion rate of 84%. Participants reported that the program was of excellent quality and met their needs. Significant preintervention to postintervention differences were found in pain, physical symptoms, psychological distress, and pain catastrophizing. CONCLUSION: The use of mHealth technology is a feasible and acceptable option for delivery of PCST for patients with cancer. This delivery mode is likely to dramatically increase intervention access for cancerpatients with pain compared to traditional in-person delivery. Preliminary data also suggest that the program is likely to produce pretreatment to post-treatment decreases in pain and other important outcomes.
Authors: Francis J Keefe; James Blumenthal; Donald Baucom; Glenn Affleck; Robert Waugh; David S Caldwell; Pat Beaupre; Susmita Kashikar-Zuck; Katherine Wright; Jennifer Egert; John Lefebvre Journal: Pain Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Karen O Anderson; Barbara Noel Dowds; Robyn E Pelletz; Thomas W Edwards; Christine Peeters-Asdourian Journal: Pain Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Frank J Penedo; Laura B Oswald; Joshua P Kronenfeld; Sofia F Garcia; David Cella; Betina Yanez Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jennifer C Plumb Vilardaga; Joseph G Winger; Irene Teo; Lynda Owen; Linda M Sutton; Francis J Keefe; Tamara J Somers Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Emily Cox-Martin; Lisa H Trahan; Matthew G Cox; Patrick M Dougherty; Emily A Lai; Diane M Novy Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Hannah M Fisher; Juliann Stalls; Joseph G Winger; Shannon N Miller; Jennifer C Plumb Vilardaga; Catherine Majestic; Sarah A Kelleher; Tamara J Somers Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Date: 2022-03-21
Authors: Joseph G Winger; Katherine Ramos; Karen E Steinhauser; Tamara J Somers; Laura S Porter; Arif H Kamal; William S Breitbart; Francis J Keefe Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2020-06
Authors: Madeline L O'Sullivan; Rebecca A Shelby; Caroline S Dorfman; Sarah A Kelleher; Hannah M Fisher; Krista A Rowe Nichols; Francis J Keefe; Anthony D Sung; Tamara J Somers Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Desiree R Azizoddin; Rosalind Adam; Daniela Kessler; Alexi A Wright; Benjamin Kematick; Clare Sullivan; Haipeng Zhang; Michael J Hassett; Mary E Cooley; Olga Ehrlich; Andrea C Enzinger Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Hannah M Fisher; Joseph G Winger; Shannon N Miller; Arianna N Wright; Jennifer C Plumb Vilardaga; Catherine Majestic; Sarah A Kelleher; Tamara J Somers Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 3.603