Jennifer C Plumb Vilardaga1, Joseph G Winger2, Irene Teo3, Lynda Owen4, Linda M Sutton4, Francis J Keefe2, Tamara J Somers2. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: jennifer.plumb.vilardaga@duke.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 3. Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medicine School, Singapore. 4. Duke Cancer Network, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Patients with advanced cancer face a life-limiting condition that brings a high symptom burden that often includes pain, fatigue, and psychological distress. Psychosocial interventions have promise for managing symptoms but need additional tailoring for these patients' specific needs. Patients with advanced cancer in the community also face persistent barriers-availability of interventions in community clinics as well as financial and illness-related factors-to accessing psychosocial interventions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of telephone implementation of Engage, a novel brief combined Coping Skills Training and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy protocol, for reducing symptoms and increasing quality of life in community patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Adult patients with advanced cancer receiving care in the community received Engage, four 60-minute manualized telephone sessions delivered by a trained psychotherapist and completed pretreatment and post-treatment assessments. RESULTS: Engage was feasible, achieving 100% accrual (N = 24) of a heterogeneous sample of patients with advanced cancer, with good retention (88% completed). Acceptability was demonstrated via satisfaction (mean 29 of 32; SD 2), engagement (95% attendance), and use of skills. Secondary analyses pointed to reductions in pain interference, fatigue, psychological distress, and improvements in psychological acceptance and engagement in value-guided activity after treatment. CONCLUSION: Engage, our brief novel combined Coping Skills and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention, demonstrated initial feasibility and acceptability when delivered over the telephone and increased access for community clinic patients with advanced cancer. Future research will assess the comparative efficacy of Engage in larger randomized trials.
CONTEXT: Patients with advanced cancer face a life-limiting condition that brings a high symptom burden that often includes pain, fatigue, and psychological distress. Psychosocial interventions have promise for managing symptoms but need additional tailoring for these patients' specific needs. Patients with advanced cancer in the community also face persistent barriers-availability of interventions in community clinics as well as financial and illness-related factors-to accessing psychosocial interventions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of telephone implementation of Engage, a novel brief combined Coping Skills Training and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy protocol, for reducing symptoms and increasing quality of life in community patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Adult patients with advanced cancer receiving care in the community received Engage, four 60-minute manualized telephone sessions delivered by a trained psychotherapist and completed pretreatment and post-treatment assessments. RESULTS: Engage was feasible, achieving 100% accrual (N = 24) of a heterogeneous sample of patients with advanced cancer, with good retention (88% completed). Acceptability was demonstrated via satisfaction (mean 29 of 32; SD 2), engagement (95% attendance), and use of skills. Secondary analyses pointed to reductions in pain interference, fatigue, psychological distress, and improvements in psychological acceptance and engagement in value-guided activity after treatment. CONCLUSION: Engage, our brief novel combined Coping Skills and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention, demonstrated initial feasibility and acceptability when delivered over the telephone and increased access for community clinic patients with advanced cancer. Future research will assess the comparative efficacy of Engage in larger randomized trials.
Authors: Frank W Bond; Steven C Hayes; Ruth A Baer; Kenneth M Carpenter; Nigel Guenole; Holly K Orcutt; Tom Waltz; Robert D Zettle Journal: Behav Ther Date: 2011-05-25
Authors: Maria Dans; Thomas Smith; Anthony Back; Justin N Baker; Jessica R Bauman; Anna C Beck; Susan Block; Toby Campbell; Amy A Case; Shalini Dalal; Howard Edwards; Thomas R Fitch; Jennifer Kapo; Jean S Kutner; Elizabeth Kvale; Charles Miller; Sumathi Misra; William Mitchell; Diane G Portman; David Spiegel; Linda Sutton; Eytan Szmuilowicz; Jennifer Temel; Roma Tickoo; Susan G Urba; Elizabeth Weinstein; Finly Zachariah; Mary Anne Bergman; Jillian L Scavone Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Jennifer C Plumb Vilardaga; Sarah A Kelleher; Allison Diachina; Jennie Riley; Tamara J Somers Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2022-08-01
Authors: Juraj Matis; Miroslav Svetlak; Alena Slezackova; Marek Svoboda; Rastislav Šumec Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 5.428