Literature DB >> 26024905

Presence of anti-Toxocara canis antibodies and risk factors in children from the Amecameca and Chalco regions of México.

Nadyeli Nava Cortés1, Camilo Romero Núñez2, Bautista Gómez Linda Guiliana3, Pedro Abel Hernández García4, Rafael Heredia Cárdenas5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Toxocariasis is a zoonotic disease that poses a threat to public health worldwide. This disease primarily affects children and is caused by the presence in the digestive tract of a common roundworm of dogs, Toxocara canis, or cats, Toxocara cati. Toxocara is responsible for the presentation of various syndromes in humans depending on the affected organs.
METHODS: In this study, the prevalence of anti-T. canis antibodies was investigated in children aged 3-16 years from semirural populations in the municipalities of Amecameca and Chalco in México. An ELISA was used to determine the presence of anti-T. canis antibodies in blood samples.
RESULTS: Of the 183 sera obtained for this study, 22 were positive for anti-T. canis antibodies (12.02%). Of these, 6.50% were from males and 5.4% were from females. Risk factors were investigated and it was found that living near a cattle operation had a statistically significant association with (Chi(2) = 5.51 and p = 0.01) and was a risk factor for (OR = 4.25, p = 0.02) seropositivity to T. canis. Keeping dogs with short hair (Chi(2) = 3.24 and p = 0.07) showed a tendency toward seropositivity for T. canis, as did the habit of sleeping with pets (Chi(2) = 3.46 and p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Seropositivity to T. canis was confirmed in children in the Amecameca and Chalco regions of México and the risk factors were identified. These findings provide important insight into the prevalence and spread of this zoonotic parasite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26024905      PMCID: PMC4449520          DOI: 10.1186/s12887-015-0385-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pediatr        ISSN: 1471-2431            Impact factor:   2.125


Background

Dogs are associated with more than 60 zoonotic diseases worldwide, mainly by parasitic organisms, posing a serious health threat to humans [1,2]. Many of these intestinal parasites are eliminated as eggs, larvae or oocysts into the environment, and for this reason, contamination with the feces of dogs in private and public areas such as parks or gardens represents an important source of infection [3,4]. One of the most common infections worldwide caused by parasites is toxocariasis, a zoonotic disease [5] caused by migrating larvae of the roundworm species Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati [6]. The eggs of this parasitic helminth may be accidentally ingested by humans [7] into the duodenum; once the eggs hatch, they release three-stage larvae (L3) through the action of gastric juice and digestive enzymes, which penetrate the intestinal wall, enter the bloodstream and migrate to different organs, where they lead to syndromes such as visceral larva migrans, covert larva migrans, ocular larva migrans and neurological larva migrans [6,8]. Some risk factors associated with this parasite include: gender, age, socioeconomic status, close contact with domestic animals [9], ingestion of raw meat [7], poor hygiene, inadequate hand washing, nail biting, eating contaminated food, and contact with soil or the hair from cats or dogs contaminated with eggs [4]. Children are the social group most at risk because of their recreation activities, hygiene and close relationship with pets [10]. In México, there have been studies to investigate the prevalence of T. canis in recreational areas, and in soil samples and the feces of stray dogs. Rates of 24 % and 67.5 % were obtained [11,12]. The high rate of contamination was thought to reflect the socioeconomic status and sanitation level of the studied region. Similar studies in other countries have also revealed a high prevalence of T. canis; for example, 66 % prevalence in Spain and 67 % prevalence in Argentina [13]. Furthermore, seroprevalence studies in children reported rates of 22.22 % in México [14] compared with 86.75 % in Taiwan in 2014 [15]. To investigate the public health threat caused by toxocariasis in more detail in México, in this study, circulating anti-T. canis antibodies and risk factors for T. canis were investigated in a semirural population in the State of México.

Methods

Study population

A total of 183 blood samples were collected from children in the municipalities of Amecameca and Chalco, México (Fig. 1), between April 2013 and February 2014. Of the children sampled, 97 were male and 86 were female, and their ages ranged from 3–16 years. Parents or guardians of minors signed an informed consent form and agreed to participate in the project, which was approved by the ethics committee of the University Center UAEM Amecameca of the Autonomous University of the State of México.
Figure 1

The location of the municipalities of Amecameca and Chalco within the State of México

The location of the municipalities of Amecameca and Chalco within the State of México

Epidemiological data collection

Epidemiological data for all of the children included in the study were obtained. These included: age, gender, height, weight, body mass index and background information regarding recent types of pathology – respiratory, dermatological, neurological, allergic and ocular – and the following risk factors: eating habits and hygiene.

Processing blood samples

A 3-ml sample of blood was obtained from each participant through phlebotomy and these samples were deposited in tubes without anticoagulant and incubated at room temperature for 40 min. Then, samples were subjected to centrifugation at 4000 × g for 10 min. The obtained sera were stored at −20 °C according to official Mexican guidelines for the storage of human samples (NOM-003-SSA2-1993).

Serological testing of blood samples

Serological tests were performed on the blood samples to measure anti-T. canis antibodies using a commercial ELISA kit, with a sensitivity of 87.5 % and specificity of 93.3 % (DIAGMEX-Toxocara® SA De CV. México). The optical density of the samples was determined using a Microplate Modulus® multiplate spectrophotometer (Turner Biosystems, Kampenhout, Belgium) at a wavelength of 460 nm [16]. The optical density cutoff value was 0.30, and sera with an optical density of 0.30 or greater were considered positive.

Statistical analysis

To compare the rates of positivity between groups, Fisher’s exact test [16] was applied. The variables obtained were analyzed by the Chi-square test to determine the levels of association; a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. The relative risk of T. canis antibodies was calculated from the odds ratio, with a significance of p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP® 8.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Of the 183 sera tested, anti-T. canis antibodies were detected in 22 (12.02 %). No statistically significant difference was found between the prevalence of anti-T. canis antibodies in males and females (Table 1; p = 0.64).
Table 1

Comparison of the presence of antibodies with Toxocara canis between genders

SexPositive n = 22 (%)Negative n = 161 (%)Total p*
Female10 (5.4 %)76 (41.5 %)860.64
Male12 (6.5 %)85 (46.4 %)97
Total12.02 %87.98 %183

*Fisher p < 0.05

Comparison of the presence of antibodies with Toxocara canis between genders *Fisher p < 0.05 Regarding risk factors, it was determined that keeping dogs with short hair (Chi2 = 3.24 and p = 0.07) showed a tendency toward seropositivity for T. canis, as did the habit of sleeping with pets (Chi2 = 3.46 and p = 0.06). By contrast, practicing preventive medicine and coexistence did not show a significant association (Table 2). Living near livestock farms showed a statistically significant association with T. canis seropositivity (Chi2 = 5.51 and p = 0.01) and was also a risk factor for T. canis seropositivity (OR = 4.25, p = 0.02) (Table 3).
Table 2

Association between risk factors and the presence of antibodies against animal-related Toxocara canis

Risk factorPositive n = 22Negative n = 161Chi2 p OR p CI
Pets at home8750.810.360.650.360.26–1.64
Sleeping with pet0133.460.060.240.330.01–4.25
Puppy <6 months2170.040.830.840.830.18–3.94
Dog licks face242.660.103.920.120.67–22.8
Dewormed >6 months ago (pet)221532.090.142.490.530.13–44.6
Dog with long hair (>1 cm)3190.250.621.180.800.31–4.36
Dog with short hair (<1 cm)3503.240.070.350.100.09–1.23
Contact with dogs or cats outside the home6590.740.380.640.390.24–1.74

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

p < 0.05

Table 3

Risk factors associated with housing

Risk factorPositive n = 22Negative n = 161Chi2 p OR p CI
Frequent visits to public parks9590.150.691.190.690.48–2.69
Live near livestock farming485.510.014.250.021.16–15.5
Garden at home6530.280.590.760.590.28–2.06

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

p < 0.05

Association between risk factors and the presence of antibodies against animal-related Toxocara canis OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval p < 0.05 Risk factors associated with housing OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval p < 0.05

Discussion

In Mexicali, México, a previous study analyzing the seroprevalence of T. canis in children reported a rate of 10.6 %, less than that in the present study (12.02 %), and a higher percentage of seropositive males (53.1 %) than females, which they attributed to differences in the games played by children and their resulting close contact with the environment [10]. In other research [17], a study conducted in southeastern São Paulo, Brazil, with volunteer donors aged 19–65 years, reported seroprevalence of 8.7 % and concluded that gender (p = 0.69) and age (p = 0.99) were not associated with parasitoses. These findings were in agreement with the present study in which no significant association was reported between gender and the presence of T. canis antibodies (p = 0.64). A study by Getaz and colleagues in 2007 found no significant association between seropositivity to T. canis and asthma, but did identify an association with nocturnal wheezing [18]. Hygiene habits, housing area and customs are factors that primarily influence the variation of seroprevalence of T. canis, and the risk of transmission increases with the degree of environmental pollution. Three research teams [19-21] conducted studies to identify the predisposing factors for the transmission of parasitic zoonoses and determined that pets in the bedroom, not regularly cleaning feces and no or inadequate hand washing after contact with animals posed the greatest risks of transmitting zoonotic diseases. Contamination with Toxocara spp. from the land in parks, playgrounds, gardens and beaches in urban and suburban areas is considered a critical factor for toxocariasis, as well as contact with dogs. The results of the current study showed that the potential risk factors of keeping dogs (Chi2 = 3.24, p = 0.07) and sleeping with dogs (Chi2 = 3.46, p = 0.06) showed a tendency toward seropositivity for T. canis but this was not a significant association. Another study of seroprevalence in children in México [14] found that frequent contact with pets was not associated with the presence of toxocariasis (Chi2 = 0.80, p = 0.37). A study in Argentina, however, found that contact with animals was an important risk factor for T. canis exposure in children (OR = 5.02, p = 0.001) [22]. These discrepancies may reflect differences between geographical locations or the size of characteristics of the sample populations between studies. Living near a cattle operation was found in the current study to show a statistically significant association (Chi2 = 5.51, p = 0.01) with the presence of anti-T. canis antibodies in children, potentially linked with the presence of stray dogs on such premises.

Conclusions

The results of this investigation revealed a seroprevalence of 12.02 % for T. canis in children in the municipalities of Amecameca and Chalco, in the State of México. We observed a higher percentage of seropositive males than females, and attributed this to their increased activity in recreational areas. Living near livestock farms was identified as a risk factor for exposure to T. canis, as assessed by the presence of anti-T. canis antibodies.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Occupational health and safety in small animal veterinary practice: Part II--Parasitic zoonotic diseases.

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Andrew S Peregrine; Julie Armstrong
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Anti-Toxocara spp. antibodies in an adult healthy population: serosurvey and risk factors in Southeast Brazil.

Authors:  Elaine Cristina Negri; Vamilton Alvares Santarém; Guita Rubinsky-Elefant; Rogério Giuffrida
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Biomed       Date:  2013-03

Review 3.  Human toxocariasis: diagnosis, worldwide seroprevalences and clinical expression of the systemic and ocular forms.

Authors:  G Rubinsky-Elefant; C E Hirata; J H Yamamoto; M U Ferreira
Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol       Date:  2010-01

4.  Human toxocariasis: a seroepidemiological survey in the Amazonian city of Yurimaguas, Peru.

Authors:  William H Roldán; Yuri A Cavero; Yrma A Espinoza; Susana Jiménez; César A Gutiérrez
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.846

5.  The investigation of Toxocara canis eggs in coats of different dog breeds as a potential transmission route in human toxocariasis.

Authors:  M Aydenizöz-Ozkayhan; B B Yağci; S Erat
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 2.738

6.  Zoonotic parasites in fecal samples and fur from dogs and cats in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Paul A M Overgaauw; Linda van Zutphen; Denise Hoek; Felix O Yaya; Jeroen Roelfsema; Elena Pinelli; Frans van Knapen; Laetitia M Kortbeek
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 2.738

7.  National seroprevalence and risk factors for Zoonotic Toxocara spp. infection.

Authors:  Kimberly Y Won; Deanna Kruszon-Moran; Peter M Schantz; Jeffrey L Jones
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Analysis of the course and treatment of toxocariasis in children-a long-term observation.

Authors:  M Wiśniewska-Ligier; T Woźniakowska-Gęsicka; J Sobolewska-Dryjańska; A Markiewicz-Jóźwiak; M Wieczorek
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Canine and feline parasitic zoonoses in China.

Authors:  Jia Chen; Min-Jun Xu; Dong-Hui Zhou; Hui-Qun Song; Chun-Ren Wang; Xing-Quan Zhu
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Seroepidemiology of Toxocara canis infection among primary schoolchildren in the capital area of the Republic of the Marshall Islands.

Authors:  Chung-Jung Fu; Ting-Wu Chuang; Huei-Shan Lin; Chih-Hsiung Wu; Yung-Ching Liu; Mailynn K Langinlur; Min-Yun Lu; Wesley Wei-Wen Hsiao; Chia-Kwung Fan
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  4 in total

1.  Frequency of Toxocariasis among Patients Clinically Suspected to Have Visceral Toxocariasis: A Retrospective Descriptive Study in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Devika Iddawela; Kiruthiha Ehambaram; Dhilma Atapattu; Kalyani Pethiyagoda; Lakmalee Bandara
Journal:  J Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-12-06

2.  Identification of Toxocara spp. eggs in dog hair and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Tania O Rojas; Camilo Romero; Rafael Heredia; Linda G Bautista; Galia Sheinberg
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-07-20

3.  Distribution and risk factors of Ascarididae and other geohelminths in the soil of Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Authors:  Kelem Cristina Pereira Mota; Daliane Faria Grama; Natália M Nasser Fava; Letícia Pereira Úngari; Elaine Silva Marques Faria; Márcia Cristina Cury
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 1.846

4.  Toxocara infection: seroprevalence and associated risk factors among primary school children in central China.

Authors:  Shuai Wang; Haoran Li; Zhijun Yao; Pengju Li; Dong Wang; Haizhu Zhang; Qing Xie; Zhenchao Zhang; Xiangrui Li
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.000

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.