Literature DB >> 26024461

Spatial integration of optic flow information in direction of heading judgments.

Laurel Issen, Krystel R Huxlin, David Knill.   

Abstract

While we know that humans are extremely sensitive to optic flow information about direction of heading, we do not know how they integrate information across the visual field. We adapted the standard cue perturbation paradigm to investigate how young adult observers integrate optic flow information from different regions of the visual field to judge direction of heading. First, subjects judged direction of heading when viewing a three-dimensional field of random dots simulating linear translation through the world. We independently perturbed the flow in one visual field quadrant to indicate a different direction of heading relative to the other three quadrants. We then used subjects' judgments of direction of heading to estimate the relative influence of flow information in each quadrant on perception. Human subjects behaved similarly to the ideal observer in terms of integrating motion information across the visual field with one exception: Subjects overweighted information in the upper half of the visual field. The upper-field bias was robust under several different stimulus conditions, suggesting that it may represent a physiological adaptation to the uneven distribution of task-relevant motion information in our visual world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26024461      PMCID: PMC4520383          DOI: 10.1167/15.6.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  33 in total

1.  Temporal and spatial integration in dynamic random-dot stimuli.

Authors:  S N Watamaniuk; R Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visual and nonvisual contributions to three-dimensional heading selectivity in the medial superior temporal area.

Authors:  Yong Gu; Paul V Watkins; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Optic flow processing for the assessment of object movement during ego movement.

Authors:  Paul A Warren; Simon K Rushton
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow.

Authors:  S K Rushton; J M Harris; M R Lloyd; J P Wann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-10-22       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Ideal observer for heading judgments.

Authors:  J A Crowell; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Radial optic flow induces vergence eye movements with ultra-short latencies.

Authors:  C Busettini; G S Masson; F A Miles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Human heading judgments in the presence of moving objects.

Authors:  C S Royden; E C Hildreth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

8.  Spatial heterogeneity in the perception of face and form attributes.

Authors:  Arash Afraz; Maryam Vaziri Pashkam; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Perceiving heading in the presence of moving objects.

Authors:  W H Warren; J A Saunders
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Humans use visual and remembered information about object location to plan pointing movements.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; David C Knill
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Dynamic Bayesian Observer Model Reveals Origins of Bias in Visual Path Integration.

Authors:  Kaushik J Lakshminarasimhan; Marina Petsalis; Hyeshin Park; Gregory C DeAngelis; Xaq Pitkow; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.