PURPOSE: Rapid disease progression associated with increased tumor proliferation has been observed during withdrawal of anti-angiogenic therapy. We characterize the dynamics of withdrawal flare for axitinib. METHODS: Thirty patients with metastatic solid malignancies received axitinib for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week drug holiday. Twenty patients suitable for PET imaging received scans with (18)F-3'deoxy-3'fluoro-L-thymidine (FLT), a marker of proliferation. Plasma VEGF and axitinib pharmacokinetic levels were also assessed at specified time points. RESULTS: During axitinib withdrawal, significant increases in both SUVmax (+22 %; p = 0.006) and SUVmean (+20 %; p = 0.001) were observed. Significant increases relative to peak axitinib concentration were observed at day 2 withdrawal for SUVmax and SUVmean, with no further significant increase from day 2 to day 7 of withdrawal. No significant change in SUVmax or SUVmean was observed during the treatment period, relative to baseline. VEGF concentration significantly increased when on drug (p < 0.001) and decreased back to a level indistinguishable from baseline by day 7 of drug washout (p = 0.448). No correlation between change in VEGF and change in imaging metrics was observed. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in tumor proliferation was observed during withdrawal of axitinib therapy, and this flare occurred within 2 days of axitinib withdrawal. An exploratory analysis indicated that this flare may be associated with poor clinical outcome.
PURPOSE: Rapid disease progression associated with increased tumor proliferation has been observed during withdrawal of anti-angiogenic therapy. We characterize the dynamics of withdrawal flare for axitinib. METHODS: Thirty patients with metastatic solid malignancies received axitinib for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week drug holiday. Twenty patients suitable for PET imaging received scans with (18)F-3'deoxy-3'fluoro-L-thymidine (FLT), a marker of proliferation. Plasma VEGF and axitinib pharmacokinetic levels were also assessed at specified time points. RESULTS: During axitinib withdrawal, significant increases in both SUVmax (+22 %; p = 0.006) and SUVmean (+20 %; p = 0.001) were observed. Significant increases relative to peak axitinib concentration were observed at day 2 withdrawal for SUVmax and SUVmean, with no further significant increase from day 2 to day 7 of withdrawal. No significant change in SUVmax or SUVmean was observed during the treatment period, relative to baseline. VEGF concentration significantly increased when on drug (p < 0.001) and decreased back to a level indistinguishable from baseline by day 7 of drug washout (p = 0.448). No correlation between change in VEGF and change in imaging metrics was observed. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in tumor proliferation was observed during withdrawal of axitinib therapy, and this flare occurred within 2 days of axitinib withdrawal. An exploratory analysis indicated that this flare may be associated with poor clinical outcome.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Winette T A van der Graaf; Jean-Yves Blay; Sant P Chawla; Dong-Wan Kim; Binh Bui-Nguyen; Paolo G Casali; Patrick Schöffski; Massimo Aglietta; Arthur P Staddon; Yasuo Beppu; Axel Le Cesne; Hans Gelderblom; Ian R Judson; Nobuhito Araki; Monia Ouali; Sandrine Marreaud; Rachel Hodge; Mohammed R Dewji; Corneel Coens; George D Demetri; Christopher D Fletcher; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Peter Hohenberger Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Glenn Liu; Robert Jeraj; Matt Vanderhoek; Scott Perlman; Jill Kolesar; Michael Harrison; Urban Simoncic; Jens Eickhoff; Lakeesha Carmichael; Bo Chao; Rebecca Marnocha; Percy Ivy; George Wilding Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Melody A Cobleigh; Virginia K Langmuir; George W Sledge; Kathy D Miller; Latrice Haney; William F Novotny; James D Reimann; Amy Vassel Journal: Semin Oncol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Andrew M Donson; Vladimir Amani; Elliot A Warner; Andrea M Griesinger; Davis A Witt; Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Lindsey M Hoffman; Todd C Hankinson; Michael H Handler; Rajeev Vibhakar; Kathleen Dorris; Nicholas K Foreman Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Matthew Scarpelli; Murtuza Rampurwala; Jens Eickhoff; Lakeesha Carmichael; Jennifer Heideman; Kimberly Binger; Jill Kolesar; Scott Perlman; Kim Harrow; Gary Dukart; Chris Liang; Robert Jeraj; Glenn Liu; Justine Yang Bruce Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Matthew Scarpelli; Justine Yang Bruce; Lakeesha Carmichael; Jens Eickhoff; Jill Kolesar; Scott Perlman; Robert Jeraj; Glenn Liu Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2016-11-05 Impact factor: 3.333