Matthew Scarpelli1, Murtuza Rampurwala2, Jens Eickhoff3, Lakeesha Carmichael3, Jennifer Heideman2, Kimberly Binger2, Jill Kolesar4, Scott Perlman2,5, Kim Harrow6, Gary Dukart6, Chris Liang6, Robert Jeraj1,2,5, Glenn Liu2,7, Justine Yang Bruce8,9. 1. Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 2. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 4. Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 6. Xcovery Holding company, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA. 7. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 8. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WIMR Room 7105, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. jybruce@medicine.wisc.edu. 9. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, USA. jybruce@medicine.wisc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A sequential approach, synchronizing cell-cycle specific chemotherapy during VEGFR-TKI treatment breaks, may improve the therapeutic index of this combination therapy. In this study we investigate the safety/tolerability and pharmacodynamic effects of docetaxel used in sequential combination with the novel VEGFR-TKI X-82. METHODS:Patients with advanced solid malignancies underwent 21-day treatment cycles with X-82 administered daily on days 1-14, a treatment break on days 15-20, and docetaxel administered on day 21. Randomization was 1:1 to either a low-dose X-82 (200 mg) or high-dose X-82 (400 mg) arm. Patients were scheduled to undergo four 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT scans to assess changes in tumor cell proliferation. PET standardized uptake values (SUV) were summarized for tumors and changes were assessed using mixed effects models. RESULTS:14 patients were enrolled and treated with median 3.5 cycles (range 0-12). Three patients in the high-dose cohort (50%) and three patients in the low-dose cohort (38%) experienced at least one grade 3 adverse event during the study (infections, cytopenias, electrolyte abnormalities, and vascular complications). Four patients with 13 metastatic tumors underwentFLT PET/CT scanning. During the cycle 1 X-82 exposure period, tumor SUVmax decreased by - 11% (p = 0.04). After administration of docetaxel and the cycle 2 X-82 exposure period, tumor SUVmax decreased - 44% (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The sequential combination of X-82 and docetaxel was safe and led to diminished FLT uptake. Further, decrease in FLT uptake during cycle 2 (X-82 plus docetaxel) was greater than in cycle 1 (X-82 alone), suggesting sequential chemotherapy enhances the pharmacodynamic effect of therapy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A sequential approach, synchronizing cell-cycle specific chemotherapy during VEGFR-TKI treatment breaks, may improve the therapeutic index of this combination therapy. In this study we investigate the safety/tolerability and pharmacodynamic effects of docetaxel used in sequential combination with the novel VEGFR-TKI X-82. METHODS:Patients with advanced solid malignancies underwent 21-day treatment cycles with X-82 administered daily on days 1-14, a treatment break on days 15-20, and docetaxel administered on day 21. Randomization was 1:1 to either a low-dose X-82 (200 mg) or high-dose X-82 (400 mg) arm. Patients were scheduled to undergo four 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT scans to assess changes in tumor cell proliferation. PET standardized uptake values (SUV) were summarized for tumors and changes were assessed using mixed effects models. RESULTS: 14 patients were enrolled and treated with median 3.5 cycles (range 0-12). Three patients in the high-dose cohort (50%) and three patients in the low-dose cohort (38%) experienced at least one grade 3 adverse event during the study (infections, cytopenias, electrolyte abnormalities, and vascular complications). Four patients with 13 metastatic tumors underwent FLT PET/CT scanning. During the cycle 1 X-82 exposure period, tumor SUVmax decreased by - 11% (p = 0.04). After administration of docetaxel and the cycle 2 X-82 exposure period, tumor SUVmax decreased - 44% (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The sequential combination of X-82 and docetaxel was safe and led to diminished FLT uptake. Further, decrease in FLT uptake during cycle 2 (X-82 plus docetaxel) was greater than in cycle 1 (X-82 alone), suggesting sequential chemotherapy enhances the pharmacodynamic effect of therapy.
Authors: Brian I Rini; Bernard Escudier; Piotr Tomczak; Andrey Kaprin; Cezary Szczylik; Thomas E Hutson; M Dror Michaelson; Vera A Gorbunova; Martin E Gore; Igor G Rusakov; Sylvie Negrier; Yen-Chuan Ou; Daniel Castellano; Ho Yeong Lim; Hirotsugu Uemura; Jamal Tarazi; David Cella; Connie Chen; Brad Rosbrook; Sinil Kim; Robert J Motzer Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Hope S Rugo; Alison T Stopeck; Anil A Joy; Stephen Chan; Shailendra Verma; Anna Lluch; Katherine F Liau; Sinil Kim; Paul Bycott; Brad Rosbrook; Angel H Bair; Denis Soulieres Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John P Crown; Véronique Diéras; Elzbieta Staroslawska; Denise A Yardley; Thomas Bachelot; Neville Davidson; Hans Wildiers; Peter A Fasching; Olivier Capitain; Manuel Ramos; Richard Greil; Francesco Cognetti; George Fountzilas; Maria Blasinska-Morawiec; Cornelia Liedtke; Rolf Kreienberg; Wilson H Miller; Vanessa Tassell; Xin Huang; Jolanda Paolini; Kenneth A Kern; Gilles Romieu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kaiyumars B Contractor; Laura M Kenny; Justin Stebbing; Lula Rosso; Rizvana Ahmad; Jimmy Jacob; Amarnath Challapalli; Federico Turkheimer; Adil Al-Nahhas; Rohini Sharma; R Charles Coombes; Eric O Aboagye Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Eric Raymond; Laetitia Dahan; Jean-Luc Raoul; Yung-Jue Bang; Ivan Borbath; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Juan Valle; Peter Metrakos; Denis Smith; Aaron Vinik; Jen-Shi Chen; Dieter Hörsch; Pascal Hammel; Bertram Wiedenmann; Eric Van Cutsem; Shem Patyna; Dongrui Ray Lu; Carolyn Blanckmeister; Richard Chao; Philippe Ruszniewski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Henryk Barthel; Marcel C Cleij; David R Collingridge; O Clyde Hutchinson; Safiye Osman; Qimin He; Sajinder K Luthra; Frank Brady; Pat M Price; Eric O Aboagye Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Martin Reck; Joachim von Pawel; Petr Zatloukal; Rodryg Ramlau; Vera Gorbounova; Vera Hirsh; Natasha Leighl; Jörg Mezger; Venice Archer; Nicola Moore; Christian Manegold Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245