Literature DB >> 2602017

Intussusception: clinical and radiographic factors influencing reducibility.

C A Stephenson1, J J Seibert, J D Strain, C M Glasier, R E Leithiser, V Iqbal.   

Abstract

Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception by barium or air enema has been widely accepted. The five-year experience with this procedure at two children's hospitals is reviewed and the results compared to previous studies. Various clinical and radiographic factors are evaluated in relation to the reduction rate. The findings show that the more distal the intussusception is encountered, the lower the rate of reduction. However, 25% are reduced within the rectum with no evidence of increased complications. Small bowel obstruction and prolonged duration of signs and symptoms decreased the rate of reduction statistically but there is no significant increase in complication rate in those attempted, contrary to a previous report. The cresent sign (dissection sign) and age of the patient are not significant factors in reduction as reported by other studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2602017     DOI: 10.1007/bf02010635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  9 in total

1.  Intussusception in the 1970s: indications for operation.

Authors:  J G Rosenfrantz; J A Cox; F N Silverman; L W Martin
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Ileocolic intussusception: hydrostatic reduction in the presence of the dissection sign.

Authors:  J F Johnson; W E Shiels
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1986

3.  Management of 344 children with intussusception.

Authors:  E R Wayne; J B Campbell; J D Burrington; W S Davis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Treatment of intussusception with small bowel obstruction: application of decision analysis.

Authors:  J C Leonidas
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Intussusception: 354 cases in 10 years.

Authors:  S H Ein; C A Stephens
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Intussusception: additional observations on the plain radiograph.

Authors:  S J White; C E Blane
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  The dissection sign of nonreducible ileocolic intussusception.

Authors:  M C Fishman; S Borden; A Cooper
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Perforation of the intussuscepted colon.

Authors:  A Humphry; S H Ein; P M Mok
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Intussusception: influence of age on reducibility.

Authors:  C Jennings; J Kelleher
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1984
  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Success with hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in relation to duration of symptoms.

Authors:  E D van den Ende; J H Allema; F W J Hazebroek; P J Breslau
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Current methods for reducing intussusception: survey results.

Authors:  Rebecca Stein-Wexler; Rachel O'Connor; Heike Daldrup-Link; Sandra L Wootton-Gorges
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-11-29

Review 3.  Reduction of intussusception: defining a better index of successful non-operative treatment.

Authors:  Basil Bekdash; Sean S Marven; Alan Sprigg
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-12-20

4.  Reduction of intussusception in infants by a pediatric surgical team: improvement in safety and outcome.

Authors:  Tadaharu Okazaki; Yuki Ogasawara; Nana Nakazawa; Hiroyuki Kobayashi; Yoshifumi Kato; Geoffrey J Lane; Atsuyuki Yamataka; Takeshi Miyano
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  The post-reduction donut sign.

Authors:  W Rohrschneider; J Tröger; B Betsch
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1994

Review 6.  Intussusception. Part 2: An update on the evolution of management.

Authors:  Alan Daneman; Oscar Navarro
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-11-21

7.  Effectiveness of pneumatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception in children.

Authors:  F Menor; H Cortina; A Marco; R Olague
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992

8.  Radiographic signs predictive of success of hydrostatic reduction of intussusception.

Authors:  Toshiaki Takahashi; Tadaharu Okazaki; Hiroko Watayo; Yuki Ogasawara; Nana Nakazawa; Yoshifumi Kato; Geoffrey J Lane; Atsuyuki Yamataka
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 9.  Current radiological management of intussusception in children.

Authors:  Hyun Soo Ko; Jens Peter Schenk; Jochen Tröger; Wiltrud K Rohrschneider
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-17       Impact factor: 7.034

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.