| Literature DB >> 26019535 |
Jian Wang1, Li-Kun Cheng2, Ning Chen2.
Abstract
The process of L-threonine production using Escherichia coli TRFC was investigated, and the result showed that there was a large amount of acetic acid in the broth. The effects of acetic acid, which is a known inhibitory metabolite in E. coli cultivation, on L-threonine production by recombinant E. coli TRFC were evaluated, and the result indicated that the growth of E. coli TRFC and L-threonine formation were significantly inhibited in the presence of acetic acid. Two combined feeding strategies were applied to L-threonine fed-batch fermentation in order to investigate the effects of the feeding strategy on L-threonine fermentation. The results showed that using the combined feeding strategy of pseudo-exponential feeding and glucose-stat feeding resulted in high cell density (36.67 g L-1) and L-threonine production (124.57 g L-1) as well as low accumulation of by-products. This work provides a useful approach for large-scale production of L-threonine.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli; L-threonine; acetic acid; combined feeding strategy
Year: 2014 PMID: 26019535 PMCID: PMC4433798 DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2014.927682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip ISSN: 1310-2818 Impact factor: 1.632
Figure 1. L-threonine production process under initial conditions. Specific production rate of L-threonine (π1); specific production rate of acetic acid (π2).
Comparison of parameters in L-threonine production at different concentrations of supplemental acetic acid.
| Concentrations of supplemental acetic acid (g L−1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kinetic parameters | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Dry cell weight (g L−1) | 25.67 | 25.07 | 23.35 | 22.72 | 21.46 |
| L-threonine (g L−1) | 82.35 | 80.25 | 76.56 | 71.47 | 62.42 |
| Specific growth rate (h−1) | 0.100 | 0.097 | 0.092 | 0.089 | 0.085 |
| Incremental acetic acid (g L−1) | 0.014 | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.013 |
| Fermentation period (h) | 40 | 42 | 45 | 52 | 55 |
Figure 2. Dry cell weight, production of L-threonine and carbon source concentration in L-threonine fermentation. Feeding strategy I: combined feeding strategy of exponential feeding and pH-stat feeding; feeding strategy II: combined feeding strategy of pseudo-exponential feeding and glucose-stat feeding. (a) Dry cell weight (filled symbols) and production of L-threonine (open symbols). (b) Concentration of sucrose (filled symbols) and concentration of glucose (open symbols).
Figure 3. Accumulation of by-products with different feeding strategies. Feeding strategy I: combined feeding strategy of exponential feeding and pH-stat feeding; feeding strategy II: combined feeding strategy of pseudo-exponential feeding and glucose-stat feeding.