Literature DB >> 26018091

Is the Swedish FRAX model appropriate for Swedish immigrants?

H Johansson1,2, A Odén3, M Lorentzon4, E McCloskey3, J A Kanis3, N C Harvey5, M K Karlsson6, D Mellström4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The incidence of hip fracture in Sweden is substantially lower in immigrants than in the population born in Sweden. Thus, the use of a FRAX® model in immigrants overestimates the risk of fracture, and the use of country of origin-specific models may be more appropriate.
INTRODUCTION: Age-specific fracture and mortality rates vary between countries so that FRAX tools are country-specific. In the case of immigrants, it is not known whether the model for the original or the new country is most appropriate. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of hip fractures in foreign-born and Swedish-born individuals residing in Sweden.
METHODS: We studied the incidence of hip fracture in all men and women aged 50 years or more in Sweden between 1987 and 2002. The population comprised 2.8 million Swedish-born and 270,000 foreign-born individuals.
RESULTS: Incident hip fractures occurred in 239,842 Swedish-born and 12,563 foreign-born individuals. The hip fracture incidence rose with age for both groups and was higher for women than men amongst both Swedish-born and foreign-born individuals. The hip fracture incidence for the Swedish-born cohort was approximately twice that of immigrants. For example, at the age of 70 years, the annual hip fracture incidence (per 100,000) was 450 (95 % CI 446-454) for a Swedish-born woman and 239 (95 % CI 223-257) for a foreign-born woman at the time of immigration. The hip fracture incidence rose slowly with time from immigration (0.6 % per annum, 95 % CI 0.5-0.8 %) but remained significantly lower than for Swedish-born individuals even after 40 years of residence.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of hip fracture in Sweden is substantially lower in immigrants than in the population native to Sweden. Although there was a small rise in age- and sex-specific incidence after immigration, the incidence remained markedly lower than that observed in Swedish-born individuals. Thus, the use of a FRAX model for Sweden will overestimate the risk of fracture for foreign-born individuals living in Sweden.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; FRAX; Hip fracture; Immigrants; Osteoporosis; Sweden

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26018091     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3180-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  24 in total

1.  Hip fracture incidence among Caucasians in Hawaii is similar to Japanese. A population-based study.

Authors:  P D Ross; C Huang
Journal:  Aging (Milano)       Date:  2000-10

2.  A comparison of hip fracture incidence among native Japanese, Japanese Americans, and American Caucasians.

Authors:  P D Ross; H Norimatsu; J W Davis; K Yano; R D Wasnich; S Fujiwara; Y Hosoda; L J Melton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Hip fracture incidence in Lebanon: a national registry-based study with reference to standardized rates worldwide.

Authors:  A M Sibai; W Nasser; W Ammar; M J Khalife; H Harb; G El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Prevalence and predictors of vitamin D deficiency in five immigrant groups living in Oslo, Norway: the Oslo Immigrant Health Study.

Authors:  K Holvik; H E Meyer; E Haug; L Brunvand
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Direct comparison of eight national FRAX® tools for fracture prediction and treatment qualification in Canadian women.

Authors:  W D Leslie; S L Brennan; L M Lix; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 8.  A systematic review of hip fracture incidence and probability of fracture worldwide.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Odén; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; D A Wahl; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register.

Authors:  Jonas F Ludvigsson; Eva Andersson; Anders Ekbom; Maria Feychting; Jeong-Lim Kim; Christina Reuterwall; Mona Heurgren; Petra Otterblad Olausson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; C Cooper; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  13 in total

1.  Access to fracture risk assessment by FRAX and linked National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidance in the UK-an analysis of anonymous website activity.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; H Johansson; N C Harvey; J Compston; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C Cooper; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Celia L Gregson; David J Armstrong; Jean Bowden; Cyrus Cooper; John Edwards; Neil J L Gittoes; Nicholas Harvey; John Kanis; Sarah Leyland; Rebecca Low; Eugene McCloskey; Katie Moss; Jane Parker; Zoe Paskins; Kenneth Poole; David M Reid; Mike Stone; Julia Thomson; Nic Vine; Juliet Compston
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.879

Review 4.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 5.  A brief history of FRAX.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Helena Johansson; Nicholas C Harvey; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Osteoporotic fractures in second-generation immigrants and Swedish natives.

Authors:  P Wändell; X Li; A C Carlsson; J Sundquist; K Sundquist
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Osteoporosis: Modern Paradigms for Last Century's Bones.

Authors:  Marlena C Kruger; Frances M Wolber
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Ethnic and geographic variations in the epidemiology of childhood fractures in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Rebecca J Moon; Nicholas C Harvey; Elizabeth M Curtis; Frank de Vries; Tjeerd van Staa; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Epidemiology of fractures in Armenia: development of a country-specific FRAX model and comparison to its surrogate.

Authors:  O Lesnyak; S Sahakyan; A Zakroyeva; J P Bilezikian; N Hutchings; V Babalyan; R Galstyan; A Lebedev; H Johansson; N C Harvey; E McCloskey; John A Kanis
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Ethnic differences in risk of hip fracture in Norway: a NOREPOS study.

Authors:  G Aamodt; R Renolen; T K Omsland; H E Meyer; K S Rabanal; A J Søgaard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.