| Literature DB >> 26017900 |
Patrick Ntonga Akono1, Jean Arthur Mbida Mbida2, Calvin Tonga3, Philippe Belong4, Odette Etoile Ngo Hondt5, Gaëlle Tamdem Magne6, Marie Florence Peka7, Leopold Gustave Lehman8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of inland valley swamps for vegetable crop agriculture contributes to food security in urban and less urbanized settings in Africa. The impact of this agriculture on aggressive mosquitoes' diversity and malaria transmission in central Africa is poorly documented. This study is aimed at assessing the impact of vegetable crop agriculture on these entomological parameters in urban and less urbanized settings of the forest area, south of Cameroon.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26017900 PMCID: PMC4455048 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-015-0906-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Map of the study area
Mosquito abundance, biting rates, sporozoitic index and EIR in urban and less urbanized settings
| Mosquito species | Abundancea | Biting ratesd (b/p/n) | Sporozoitic indexe (%) | EIRd (ib/p/n) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAb site | RBc site | HA site | RB site | HA site | RB site | HA site | RB site | ||
| Urban settings (Yaoundé) |
| 11,268 | 1744 | 17.4 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 8.3 | 1.39 | 1.13 |
|
| 6723 | 44 | 10.4 | 0.07 | 0.9 | 6.8 | 0.47 | 0.007 | |
|
| - | 374 | - | 0.6 | - | 5 | - | 0.03 | |
| Culicinae | 539 | 181 | 0.8 | 0.27 | - | - | - | - | |
| Overall | 18,530 | 2343 | 28.6 | 3.64 | 1.4 | 6.7 | 1.86 | 1.167 | |
| Less urbanized settings (Akonolinga) |
| 9911 | 1573 | 15.3 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 7.05 | 1.32 | 0.9 |
|
| 7185 | 746 | 11.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 8.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | |
|
| 128 | 1778 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 5.5 | 7.06 | 0.01 | 0.93 | |
|
| 28 | 16 | 0.04 | 0.03 | - | - | - | - | |
| Culicinae | 3382 | 323 | 5.2 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - | |
| Overall | 20,634 | 4436 | 31.8 | 6.83 | 1.8 | 7.2 | 2.13 | 2.33 | |
aAbundance: Within 648 man-night captures
bHA: Hydro-Agricultural
cRB: River Bank
dBiting rates and EIR are calculated over the year
eELISA test was performed on part of the total number of Anopheles mosquitoes captured
Fig. 2Variation of biting rates in relation with rainfall and sites characteristics (a: Hydro-agricultural site in urban setting; b: River bank site in urban setting; c: Hydro-agricultural site in less urbanized setting; d: River bank site in less urbanized setting)
Comparison of biting rates and EIR in study sites
| Urbanization level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less urbanized setting | Urban setting |
| ||
| Biting rate (b/p/n) | HAa sites | 31.8 | 28.6 | 0.48 |
| RBb sites | 6.83 | 3.64 | <0.0001 | |
|
| <0.0001 | <0.0001 | - | |
| Overall mean | 19.315 | 16.12 | 0.131 | |
| EIR (ib/p/n) | HA sites | 2.13 | 1.86 | 0.2 |
| RB sites | 2.33 | 1.167 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 0.02 | 0.008 | - | |
| Overall mean | 2.23 | 1.51 | <0.0001 | |
aHA: Hydro-Agricultural
bRB: River Bank
Fig. 3Variation of sporozoitic index in relation with rainfall and sites characteristics (a: Hydro-agricultural site in urban setting; b: River bank site in urban setting; c: Hydro-agricultural site in less urbanized setting; d: River bank site in less urbanized setting)
Fig. 4Variation of EIR in relation with rainfall and sites characteristics (d: Hydro-agricultural site in urban setting; b: River bank site in urban setting; c: Hydro-agricultural site in less urbanized setting; a: River bank site in less urbanized setting)
Physicochemical parameters of mosquito breeding sites
| Parameters | Urban setting (Yaoundé) | Less urbanized setting (Akonolinga) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydro-agricultural site | River site | Hydro-agricultural site | River site | |||||
| Mean ± SE | Range | Mean ± SE | Range | Mean ± SE | Range | Mean ± SE | Range | |
| Dissolved oxygen | 7.8 ± 0.7 | 7.3–8.3 | 9.7 ± 1.1 | 8.9–11.2 | 9.2 ± 0.5 | 6.1–7.8 | 8.5 ± 0.7 | 6.3–9.2 |
| pH | 5.01 ± 0.5 | 5.7–6.4 | 6.3 ± 0.7 | 4.9–6.3 | 6.7 ± 1.1 | 5.2–7.3 | 6.9 ± 0.4 | 6.2–8.1 |
| Salinity (%) | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.08–0.1 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.05–0.1 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.06–0.09 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.08–0.2 |
| Conductivity (μS/cm) | 294.7 ± 8.9 | 275.5–304.5 | 305.4 ± 5.7 | 277.3–325.1 | 247.3 ± 7.2 | 228.4–269.5 | 294.2 ± 5.4 | 250.3–335.5 |
| Water temperature (°C) | 27.5 ± 2.3 | 22.2–30.4 | 22.2 ± 3.1 | 21.3–28.2 | 28.4 ± 2.9 | 24.6–32.1 | 22.7 ± 1.8 | 24.3–29.5 |
| Total dissolved solids (mg/L) | 50.6 ± 2.6 | 60.4–70.2 | 110.3 ± 4.2 | 97.3–124.2 | 71.4 ± 1.2 | 64.5–78.3 | 97.9 ± 2.4 | 86.8–107.4 |
| Turbidity (NTU) | 31.2 ± 2.7 | 27–35 | 27 ± 1.7 | 24–31 | 35 ± 2.3 | 30–40 | 28 ± 2.1 | 22–34 |
| Sulfate (mg/L) | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 2.7–3.5 | 0 ± 0 | 0–0 | 2 ± 0.1 | 1.7–2.3 | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 0.008–0.4 |
| Phosphate (mg/L) | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.08–0.16 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.09–0.16 | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 0.08–0.7 | 0.05 ± 0.001 | 0.02–0.08 |
| Nitrate (mg/L) | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.0–2.6 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 1.8–2.8 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 1.5–2.3 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 1.9–2.3 |
| Magnesium (mg/L) | 30 ± 2.8 | 25–33 | 27 ± 1.8 | 23–31 | 33 ± 1.4 | 27–36 | 21 ± 0.9 | 18–25 |
| Calcium (mg/L) | 94 ± 8.9 | 90–98 | 115 ± 7.9 | 95–130 | 87 ± 1.3 | 79–98 | 112 ± 2.6 | 97–119 |
| Aquatic plants | (+) | - | (+++) | - | (+) | - | (+++) | - |
| Fish | (−) | - | (+++) | - | (−) | - | (+++) | - |
| Aquatic invertebrates | (−) | - | (+++) | - | (−) | - | (+++) | - |
(+++) = very abundant; (+) = scarce; (−) = absent - = No data available