BACKGROUND: The relationship between mosquito development and temperature is one of the keys to understanding the current and future dynamics and distribution of vector-borne diseases such as malaria. Many process-based models use mean air temperature to estimate larval development times, and hence adult vector densities and/or malaria risk. METHODS: Water temperatures in three different-sized water pools, as well as the adjacent air temperature in lowland and highland sites in western Kenya were monitored. Both air and water temperatures were fed into a widely-applied temperature-dependent development model for Anopheles gambiae immatures, and subsequently their impact on predicted vector abundance was assessed. RESULTS: Mean water temperature in typical mosquito breeding sites was 4-6 degrees C higher than the mean temperature of the adjacent air, resulting in larval development rates, and hence population growth rates, that are much higher than predicted based on air temperature. On the other hand, due to the non-linearities in the relationship between temperature and larval development rate, together with a marginal buffering in the increase in water temperature compared with air temperature, the relative increases in larval development rates predicted due to climate change are substantially less. CONCLUSIONS: Existing models will tend to underestimate mosquito population growth under current conditions, and may overestimate relative increases in population growth under future climate change. These results highlight the need for better integration of biological and environmental information at the scale relevant to mosquito biology.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between mosquito development and temperature is one of the keys to understanding the current and future dynamics and distribution of vector-borne diseases such as malaria. Many process-based models use mean air temperature to estimate larval development times, and hence adult vector densities and/or malaria risk. METHODS:Water temperatures in three different-sized water pools, as well as the adjacent air temperature in lowland and highland sites in western Kenya were monitored. Both air and water temperatures were fed into a widely-applied temperature-dependent development model for Anopheles gambiae immatures, and subsequently their impact on predicted vector abundance was assessed. RESULTS: Mean water temperature in typical mosquito breeding sites was 4-6 degrees C higher than the mean temperature of the adjacent air, resulting in larval development rates, and hence population growth rates, that are much higher than predicted based on air temperature. On the other hand, due to the non-linearities in the relationship between temperature and larval development rate, together with a marginal buffering in the increase in water temperature compared with air temperature, the relative increases in larval development rates predicted due to climate change are substantially less. CONCLUSIONS: Existing models will tend to underestimate mosquito population growth under current conditions, and may overestimate relative increases in population growth under future climate change. These results highlight the need for better integration of biological and environmental information at the scale relevant to mosquito biology.
Authors: Jonathan A Patz; Mike Hulme; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Timothy D Mitchell; Richard A Goldberg; Andrew K Githeko; Subhash Lele; Anthony J McMichael; David Le Sueur Journal: Nature Date: 2002-12-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Simon I Hay; Jonathan Cox; David J Rogers; Sarah E Randolph; David I Stern; G Dennis Shanks; Monica F Myers; Robert W Snow Journal: Nature Date: 2002-02-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: John E Gimnig; Maurice Ombok; Samson Otieno; Michael G Kaufman; John M Vulule; Edward D Walker Journal: J Med Entomol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 2.278
Authors: Natacha Protopopoff; Wim Van Bortel; Niko Speybroeck; Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden; Dismas Baza; Umberto D'Alessandro; Marc Coosemans Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Paul E Parham; Joanna Waldock; George K Christophides; Deborah Hemming; Folashade Agusto; Katherine J Evans; Nina Fefferman; Holly Gaff; Abba Gumel; Shannon LaDeau; Suzanne Lenhart; Ronald E Mickens; Elena N Naumova; Richard S Ostfeld; Paul D Ready; Matthew B Thomas; Jorge Velasco-Hernandez; Edwin Michael Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2015-04-05 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Susan S Imbahale; Krijn P Paaijmans; Wolfgang R Mukabana; Ron van Lammeren; Andrew K Githeko; Willem Takken Journal: Malar J Date: 2011-04-10 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Joanna Waldock; Nastassya L Chandra; Jos Lelieveld; Yiannis Proestos; Edwin Michael; George Christophides; Paul E Parham Journal: Pathog Glob Health Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Lauren B Carrington; M Veronica Armijos; Louis Lambrechts; Christopher M Barker; Thomas W Scott Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lauren J Cator; Shalu Thomas; Krijn P Paaijmans; Sangamithra Ravishankaran; Johnson A Justin; Manu T Mathai; Andrew F Read; Matthew B Thomas; Alex Eapen Journal: Malar J Date: 2013-03-02 Impact factor: 2.979