Literature DB >> 26017613

Venous thromboembolism in body contouring: an analysis of 17,774 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement databases.

Ari M Wes1, Jason D Wink, Stephen J Kovach, John P Fischer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism following body contouring.
METHODS: The authors reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2012 for all body contouring cases. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine predictors of venous thromboembolism, and used to define risk scores for each significant predictor.
RESULTS: Seventeen thousand seven hundred seventy-four patients underwent body contouring during the study period. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 99 individuals (0.56 percent). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that age older than 45 years [45 to 60 years (OR, 1.54; p = 0.1); older than 60 years (OR 3.1, p < 0.001)], undergoing contouring of the trunk (OR, 2.75; p < 0.001), obesity [body mass index of 30 to 34.9 (OR, 3.35; p < 0.001); body mass index of 35 to 39.9 (OR, 4.41; p < 0.001); body mass index ≥ 40 (OR, 3.14; p = 0.001)], and admission on an inpatient basis (OR, 3.01; p < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of venous thromboembolism. Patients' total scores were categorized as low (0 to 4), medium (5 to 7), or high risk (8 to 9). The low-risk cohort exhibited a venous thromboembolism incidence of 0.14 percent, the medium-risk cohort experienced an incidence of 0.97 percent, and the high-risk group experienced a venous thromboembolism incidence of 2.95 percent.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies predictors of venous thromboembolism and creates a simple risk-scoring model using a large, prospective data set. The authors' analysis demonstrates that in the presence of certain risk factors, the incidence of venous thromboembolism increases dramatically; in these cases, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis may be warranted. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26017613     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Plastic Surgery Patients Undergoing Facelift.

Authors:  Rohun Gupta; Jithin John; Monik Gupta; Kenneth Shaheen
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 2.  Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.

Authors:  Haley F M Augustine; Jiayi Hu; Zainab Najarali; Matthew McRae
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Caprini Scores, Risk Stratification, and Rivaroxaban in Plastic Surgery: Time to Reconsider Our Strategy.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-06-13

4.  Legal issues related to postoperative pulmonary thromboembolism in Korea.

Authors:  Bo Young Park; Min Ji Kim; So Ra Kang; Seung Eun Hong
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 1.859

5.  Systematic review of the venous thromboembolism risk assessment models used in aesthetic plastic surgery.

Authors:  Amelia J White; Muholan Kanapathy; Dariush Nikkhah; Mo Akhavani
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-08-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.