Literature DB >> 26016698

A Computational Evaluation of Sentence Processing Deficits in Aphasia.

Umesh Patil1, Sandra Hanne1, Frank Burchert1, Ria De Bleser1, Shravan Vasishth1.   

Abstract

Individuals with agrammatic Broca's aphasia experience difficulty when processing reversible non-canonical sentences. Different accounts have been proposed to explain this phenomenon. The Trace Deletion account (Grodzinsky, 1995, 2000, 2006) attributes this deficit to an impairment in syntactic representations, whereas others (e.g., Caplan, Waters, Dede, Michaud, & Reddy, 2007; Haarmann, Just, & Carpenter, 1997) propose that the underlying structural representations are unimpaired, but sentence comprehension is affected by processing deficits, such as slow lexical activation, reduction in memory resources, slowed processing and/or intermittent deficiency, among others. We test the claims of two processing accounts, slowed processing and intermittent deficiency, and two versions of the Trace Deletion Hypothesis (TDH), in a computational framework for sentence processing (Lewis & Vasishth, 2005) implemented in ACT-R (Anderson, Byrne, Douglass, Lebiere, & Qin, 2004). The assumption of slowed processing is operationalized as slow procedural memory, so that each processing action is performed slower than normal, and intermittent deficiency as extra noise in the procedural memory, so that the parsing steps are more noisy than normal. We operationalize the TDH as an absence of trace information in the parse tree. To test the predictions of the models implementing these theories, we use the data from a German sentence-picture matching study reported in Hanne, Sekerina, Vasishth, Burchert, and De Bleser (2011). The data consist of offline (sentence-picture matching accuracies and response times) and online (eye fixation proportions) measures. From among the models considered, the model assuming that both slowed processing and intermittent deficiency are present emerges as the best model of sentence processing difficulty in aphasia. The modeling of individual differences suggests that, if we assume that patients have both slowed processing and intermittent deficiency, they have them in differing degrees.
Copyright © 2015 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aphasia; Cognitive architecture; Computational modeling; Eye movements; Individual differences; Non-canonical sentences; Sentence-picture matching

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26016698     DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  10 in total

1.  Effects of prosody on the cognitive and neural resources supporting sentence comprehension: A behavioral and lesion-symptom mapping study.

Authors:  Arianna N LaCroix; Nicole Blumenstein; McKayla Tully; Leslie C Baxter; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Recovery of Online Sentence Processing in Aphasia: Eye Movement Changes Resulting From Treatment of Underlying Forms.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Tracking sentence comprehension: Test-retest reliability in people with aphasia and unimpaired adults.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Andrew Zu-Sern Wei; Stephanie Gutierrez; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.710

4.  The effects of prosody on sentence comprehension: evidence from a neurotypical control group and seven cases of chronic stroke.

Authors:  Arianna N LaCroix; Nicole Blumenstein; Chloe Houlihan; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 0.881

5.  Sentence Processing in Aphasia: An Examination of Material-Specific and General Cognitive Factors.

Authors:  Laura L Murray
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 1.710

6.  Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study.

Authors:  Lena A Jäger; Daniela Mertzen; Julie A Van Dyke; Shravan Vasishth
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Predicting language treatment response in bilingual aphasia using neural network-based patient models.

Authors:  Uli Grasemann; Claudia Peñaloza; Maria Dekhtyar; Risto Miikkulainen; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Parameter Inference for Computational Cognitive Models with Approximate Bayesian Computation.

Authors:  Antti Kangasrääsiö; Jussi P P Jokinen; Antti Oulasvirta; Andrew Howes; Samuel Kaski
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-06

9.  Thematic Integration Impairments in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Evidence From Eye-Tracking.

Authors:  Matthew Walenski; Jennifer E Mack; M Marsel Mesulam; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Flexible and efficient simulation-based inference for models of decision-making.

Authors:  Jan Boelts; Jan-Matthis Lueckmann; Richard Gao; Jakob H Macke
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 8.713

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.