Barbara Bohn1, Antje Herbst2, Martin Pfeifer3, Dietmar Krakow4, Stefan Zimny5, Florian Kopp6, Andreas Melmer7, Jürgen M Steinacker8, Reinhard W Holl9. 1. Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, ZIBMT, German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany barbara.bohn@uni-ulm.de. 2. Centre for Paediatrics, Medical Clinic Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany. 3. Diabetes Center, Clinic Tettnang, Tettnang, Germany. 4. DZFO, Diabetes Centre Forchheim, Forchheim, Germany. 5. Center for Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Diabetology, Schwerin Hospital, Schwerin, Germany. 6. Diabetes Center, Augsburg Clinical Center, Augsburg, Germany. 7. Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 8. Division of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. 9. Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, ZIBMT, German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Physical activity (PA) can improve cardiovascular risk in the general population and in patients with type 2 diabetes. Studies also indicate an HbA(1c)-lowering effect in patients with type 2 diabetes. Since reports in patients with type 1 diabetes are scarce, this analysis aimed to investigate whether there is an association between PA and glycemic control or cardiovascular risk in subjects with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 18,028 adults (≥18 to <80 years of age) from Germany and Austria with type 1 diabetes from the Diabetes-Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentation (DPV) database were included. Patients were stratified according to their self-reported frequency of PA (PA0, inactive; PA1, one to two times per week; PA2, more than two times per week). Multivariable regression models were applied for glycemic control, diabetes-related comorbidities, and cardiovascular risk factors. Data were adjusted for sex, age, and diabetes duration. P values for trend were given. SAS 9.4 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: An inverse association between PA and HbA(1c), diabetic ketoacidosis, BMI, dyslipidemia (all P < 0.0001), and hypertension (P = 0.0150), as well as between PA and retinopathy or microalbuminuria (both P < 0.0001), was present. Severe hypoglycemia (assistance required) did not differ in PA groups (P = 0.8989), whereas severe hypoglycemia with coma was inversely associated with PA (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PA seemed to be beneficial with respect to glycemic control, diabetes-related comorbidities, and cardiovascular risk factors without an increase of adverse events. Hence, our data underscore the recommendation for subjects with type 1 diabetes to perform regular PA.
OBJECTIVE: Physical activity (PA) can improve cardiovascular risk in the general population and in patients with type 2 diabetes. Studies also indicate an HbA(1c)-lowering effect in patients with type 2 diabetes. Since reports in patients with type 1 diabetes are scarce, this analysis aimed to investigate whether there is an association between PA and glycemic control or cardiovascular risk in subjects with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 18,028 adults (≥18 to <80 years of age) from Germany and Austria with type 1 diabetes from the Diabetes-Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentation (DPV) database were included. Patients were stratified according to their self-reported frequency of PA (PA0, inactive; PA1, one to two times per week; PA2, more than two times per week). Multivariable regression models were applied for glycemic control, diabetes-related comorbidities, and cardiovascular risk factors. Data were adjusted for sex, age, and diabetes duration. P values for trend were given. SAS 9.4 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: An inverse association between PA and HbA(1c), diabetic ketoacidosis, BMI, dyslipidemia (all P < 0.0001), and hypertension (P = 0.0150), as well as between PA and retinopathy or microalbuminuria (both P < 0.0001), was present. Severe hypoglycemia (assistance required) did not differ in PA groups (P = 0.8989), whereas severe hypoglycemia with coma was inversely associated with PA (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PA seemed to be beneficial with respect to glycemic control, diabetes-related comorbidities, and cardiovascular risk factors without an increase of adverse events. Hence, our data underscore the recommendation for subjects with type 1 diabetes to perform regular PA.
Authors: Kimberly A Driscoll; Karen D Corbin; David M Maahs; Richard Pratley; Franziska K Bishop; Anna Kahkoska; Korey K Hood; Elizabeth Mayer-Davis Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: I Turinese; P Marinelli; M Bonini; M Rossetti; G Statuto; T Filardi; A Paris; A Lenzi; S Morano; P Palange Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Michael R Rickels; Stephanie N DuBose; Elena Toschi; Roy W Beck; Alandra S Verdejo; Howard Wolpert; Martin J Cummins; Brett Newswanger; Michael C Riddell Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 19.112